Imagine calling the world's 3rd richest man (only recently first richest) who created the world's first and only successful private space launch company and the world's first and only successful EV company a "fucking loser"that thing called Elon Musk a "fucking loser"?
Elon retweets:
Full thread from here:
The same laws don't apply to these people. It's been proven time and time again.
Correct. SBI is small part of a much larger issue within the industry. They are able to thrive because the people working at studios agree with what they do. The only way to encourage real change is to stop buying woke products like the Saints Row reboot.
Modern day massive cult. Everyone successful is garbage.
I thought I read that EA is financing this studio to make the Black Panther game so wouldn't they be held accountable if they let this discrimination stand.
The meltdowns on Twitter have been glorious
I just don’t get the obvious avoidance of the fact that SBI started this. Straight up.
Like it’s so in your fucking face you’d need surgery two times. It’s such a curbstomp, misfire to the face fail and the fact that these freaks haven’t gone silent because of it near blows my fucking mind
Kind of, but it's also become the #5 or #6 largest curator group on Steam, and it's still growing.
I was thinking exactly this. It's the development studios and publishers who are making the choice to hire SBI. Nobody is forcing them. If these firms believe hiring them and taking their advice is beneficial for their product, that decision is entirely on them.
I mean, you have the co founder telling employees to threaten developers.
but it's still a choice. You can make successful games without ESG money and without falling for dubious threats.
That time never existed. Or it was in the Atari era maybe?
But it did? Were games in the 90s used to propagate social agendas? Perhaps an insignificant minority, but there were certainly no discoures like now.
You say that as if he's good with either of those things. Not only is Piscatella apparently an idiot mark who thinks everyone seeing this is an idiot, he's been routinely wrong about the direction gaming is going in. He's nothing but an industry stooge regurgitating corporate talking points for the stock market.
Games where seen by politics as a easy target for one. I admit that Nintendo strategy ti make games for kids protected us from some of it and that it is hard to make arcade games political. But as soonbas games got compkex enough to be more than Tetris and be made by more than 1 or 2 people they naturally got human bias in it. From this there is almost nothing that can stop it to get a political message. People just got smarter/worse at doing it. Do you think that MSG2 don't have a political message?
You need a spine to feel outrage.
those games also had people complaining about certain aspects of them. Specifically aspects that appear to have been worked on by the company.
Self awareness, not even once.
