That was a horrible shot..not saying that if it was a better shot it would have registered but maybe.
Ain't easy to aim when your framerate suddenly drops to half when you're aiming.
That was a horrible shot..not saying that if it was a better shot it would have registered but maybe.
Ain't easy to aim when your framerate suddenly drops to half when you're aiming.
Half the responses of that thread...yeesh! People can see frame drops only when it's convenient I guess.Ain't easy to aim when your framerate suddenly drops to half when you're aiming.
The poo poo everyone is flinging on Fallout 4 is making me sad.
No one is saying the game won't be good. But technical problems are still problems, especially from a big studio. Ubisoft dealt with it for Unity, so it's only fair that bethesda doesn't get a pass on it either.
Half the responses of that thread...yeesh! People can see frame drops only when it's convenient I guess.
This Fallout Thread is scaring me.
People defending a company that didnt even bother to fix their old console ports and say even if the framerate is shit, its fine if the game is fun and kinda being passive-agressive of anyone who dares to criticize the port..-
Push the games industry towards what? If you want an objective review based on how the piece of media pushes the industry forward, then you must have an end point by which it can be measured. And who decides what that end point is? You? Me? Karl Marx?
No one is saying the game won't be good. But technical problems are still problems, especially from a big studio. Ubisoft dealt with it for Unity, so it's only fair that bethesda doesn't get a pass on it either.
After having completed Until Dawn yesterday and then reading through the OT I can confirm yet again that a significant portion of GAFers are either visually challenged or very good at deluding themselves. Yeeesh. And even if I were fine with FO4's performance right now I would be concerned about how it'll run after 50-100hrs play time.
As much of a fanboy I am for Beth, I definitely acknowledge the bugs. I'm just hoping there's nothing game breaking and it's enjoyable.
i hope it's no more max stuffOh yeah they are making Life is Strange 2 for you guys.
also in lis you weren't constantly being given very manipulative choices like "choose who lives and dies" so whenever one of these choices "doesn't matter" and you end up getting chloe in trouble anyways or whatever it doesn't feel so bad.Well theyin a way. Maybe not in last 20 minutes but i felt different whenever game reminded me ondo matteri did few episodes back.choice
the rule says that ppl will wait for new vegas 2 to complain about performance and bugs
That won't happen since they have 8GB GDDR5 this time. You are right about the delusion part, some people legit thought it was a perk that was slowing down ADS, I can'tAfter having completed Until Dawn yesterday and then reading through the OT I can confirm yet again that a significant portion of GAFers are either visually challenged or very good at deluding themselves. Yeeesh. And even if I were fine with FO4's performance right now I would be concerned about how it'll run after 50-100hrs play time.
also in lis you weren't constantly being given very manipulative choices like "choose who lives and dies" so whenever one of these choices "doesn't matter" and you end up getting chloe in trouble anyways or whatever it doesn't feel so bad.
the stakes in something like twd are so high that it's really draining just to make a choice at all, and when you start noticing that you put a lot of emotional effort into a decision that just gets overwritten then you stop caring and that's that game's big failure imo
the rule says that ppl will wait for new vegas 2 to complain about performance and bugs
and i feel there's a lot of bad rep for fo4 already, i can't remember the last time a big game like fo4 had this much hate
There is no real "hate" for Fallout 4. People were waiting for a long time and they are getting same things again. And then come real issue and that is hyperbole in Fallout 4 threads. People who like Bethesda games can;t accept criticism and people who complain usually blow things out of proportion.
That won't happen since they have 8GB GDDR5 this time. You are right about the delusion part, some people legit thought it was a perk that was slowing down ADS, I can't
it's not the only reason why i think lis does it better, but it's an important one. the cadence with which twd gave u overwritten choices is much higher to lis' and it's often just a really ugly thing like someone getting killed. it's desensitizing cos it happens so often. in lisBut that's theexact thing LiS did
maybe i'm noticing because fallout is something i really care about but it seems like every other post here is someone quoting something bad about fo4 or about someone defending beth or whatever. exaggerating but u get what i meanThere is no real "hate" for Fallout 4. People were waiting for a long time and they are getting same things again. And then come real issue and that is hyperbole in Fallout 4 threads. People who like Bethesda games can;t accept criticism and people who complain usually blow things out of proportion.
it's not the only reason why i think lis does it better, but it's an important one. the cadence with which twd gave u overwritten choices is much higher to lis' and it's often just a really ugly thing like someone getting killed. it's desensitizing cos it happens so often. in lisit's just the ending, and only one of them i guess
and also, the time travel mechanic allowed you to see the consequences of ur choices even if some of them get forcibly rewound. in my storykate was dead for most of the episodes, even if she's magically back at the end
That seems like every AAA title thread.
I wonder if the problems on ps4 will translate to other platforms. Didn't they have a lot of trouble with Skyrim on PS3?
i mean, sure, but you gotta see the full picture to compare the two and since these are almost story-only games context means a lotYou seem to be in the same camp as dex that's putting the story in front more so then anything else. I'm not trying to say TWD is better then LiS because X and X. I was just talking broadly of the way choices are handled in both companies games. In that they are more similar then people give them credit for.
i mean, sure, but you gotta see the full picture to compare the two and since these are almost story-only games context means a lot
both games sometimes ignore your choices and do whatever they want, that's true
it's just that lis does a really good job of showing you what would've happened because time travel is like a fantastic mechanic to have in a game like this
So if Watch Dogs 2 was set in a modern, smart city version of Boston how'd you feel?
This Fallout Thread is scaring me.
People defending a company that didnt even bother to fix their old console ports and say even if the framerate is shit, its fine if the game is fun and kinda being passive-agressive of anyone who dares to criticize the port..-
So if Watch Dogs 2 was set in a modern, smart city version of Boston how'd you feel?
also on your edit, while what you say is true,I guess I can agree to that. It was nice to be able to see both outcomes and choose from there.
I was able to earn a total of 101 achievements in the 14 games I played. But much more importantly than that:
Snip
not tryin to be a jerk but i actually liked that part the leastI think my favorite part about the way they approached choice in Life is Strange is the whole subtle but disturbing implication thatThey could have done a better job of showing the effects of these for sure, but it was a really fun way to address the true 'lack of choice' issue in story driven titles.all of your choices did matter, they're just happening in alternate timelines you hopped into. So performing a certain action will leave that timeline's Max with the consequences after you've gone to the next.
I was skipping through the double fine's day of devs streams, and while they showed mostly the usual indie stuff you have probably seen elsewhere already, this one game I had never heard of before went immediately to the top of all kinds of lists for me.
Secret Legend
I have no idea what kind of game it is other than that it obviously looks like some Zelda homage, but it's just so pretty.
People saying "I don't see any drops" disturbs me more, save that $60 you were going to use to buy the game to have an eye appointment
I barely notice the drops, but I think that's because I've had garbage PCs most of my life.
Any of you guys know if the physical release of Fallout 4 is redeemable on steam?
It doesn't have to be a literal measuring stick, but the reviewer uses his review to set up his argument and then supports it with the game and contextual examples within the genre.
Do you think gaming journalism is in a good place?
I don't think that gaming journalism is in a good place, nor do I think it's in a bad place. But I don't think reviews are the place to discover objective truths like what moves the industry forward. That sort of thing is better suited for academic criticism, which is sorely lacking from the industry.
There's professors and literature and decades of study on film theory, music theory, but barely anything for games.
Free Ace of Words steam code (gleamio tasks).
https://gleam.io/bgx0w/embed?l=http://www.giveaways4ever.com/
I have to do all that for a free $3.99 game?
Free Ace of Words steam code (gleamio tasks).
https://gleam.io/bgx0w/embed?l=http://www.giveaways4ever.com/