deandotscott
Member
OMG TEH RUMOURZOOOR
belgurdo said:mission failed?
human5892 said:SOURCE?!
God help me if this is true, because I might have to buy a fucking EA game.
I make myself cry.belgurdo said:You make me cry and cry
No, you only start posting sense when you include a source with your news.deandotscott said:I love the 'junior member' jibes. They're brilliant. Because you only start posting sense when you become a full member, right?
Doesn't alter the fact that I'm right about this. The SNES game Super Punch-Out!! is included in Fight Night R2 for Cube. Fact.
Haha, that's an excellent way of putting it.Do The Mario said:LOL!
More like Fight Night included with Super Punch out if true!
deandotscott said:I love the 'junior member' jibes. They're brilliant. Because you only start posting sense when you become a full member, right?
Doesn't alter the fact that I'm right about this. The SNES game Super Punch-Out!! is included in Fight Night R2 for Cube. Fact.
deandotscott said:I love the 'junior member' jibes. They're brilliant. Because you only start posting sense when you become a full member, right?
Doesn't alter the fact that I'm right about this. The SNES game Super Punch-Out!! is included in Fight Night R2 for Cube. Fact.
Well, to boost the game's sales, for one. I'm sure EA probably also recognizes it as a gesture of goodwill.Unison said:I don't believe this news.
... and what would be the point? Why would Nintendo beat down their own franchise like this?!
Not good enough.deandotscott said:The 'source' would be me, after I put the NR disc in the debug GameCube and saw it WITH MY OWN EYES.
trippingmartian said:Nintendo seriously needs to make a sequel to Super Punch-Out!!
deandotscott said:"Not good enough"
How embarrassing for you. Do you not believe the sun is up unless somebody provides an internet link? This is actual breaking news. How about they ban me if I'm wrong, but ban you if I'm right? Fancy that wager, cowboy?
Videogames journalist, 27, UK.
No, how about a) you provide some proof or be proven wrong, and I'll still remain unbanned either way, because b) only a fucking jackass would automatically believe any old shit posted by any old forum poster on a random fucking messageboard.deandotscott said:"Not good enough"
How embarrassing for you. Do you not believe the sun is up unless somebody provides an internet link? This is actual breaking news. How about they ban me if I'm wrong, but ban you if I'm right? Fancy that wager, cowboy?
Renewing interest in it by including it with a game a lot of people could buy = "beating it down"?Unison said:... and what would be the point? Why would Nintendo beat down their own franchise like this?!
Santa's been working out lately, I see.
Unison said:I'd believe it if it said the game was to include SPU *characters*, but as is, it sounds too dumb to be true. Why would they simply include an ages-old game that probably stomps all over EA's offering? Who would win here?
Yeah, but for a lot of people, their SNES is long gone, or it's more convenient to be able to play it on a system they have hooked up right now (or hooked up on their better TV, sound equipment, etc.)Shig said:And for people that are thinking of buying this just for SPO, you know you can probably get the SNES cart for less than the price this will be, right?
Amen to that. After seeing those HL2 Facility map mod screens a Goldeneye remake is high on my wish list.vesuvious said:On a related note...what Nintendo really needs to do is hand EA the code to Goldeneye and either redo it on the DS or include it in the next Bond game on the Gamecube or Revolution. Now that would rock.
vesuvious said:but how many hardcore gamers out there would buy this game just for Super Punch Out!! ?
deandotscott said:The collective scepticism here bores me. You know the facts, and I'll leave you alone to cry about it at your leisure.
trippingmartian said:Nintendo seriously needs to make a sequel to Super Punch-Out!!
Kifimbo said:Every hardcore gamer who plan to buy the game anyway on another console because of the online mode?