Well they better start liking her, because she's the only chance we have for the GE. Sanders will never be able to get independents with his crazy super liberal policies.
That has norhing to do with my point... Plus, Bernie has not been exposed to a sustained negative campaign yet. You do realize that no President in modern times has come close to winning trying to raise taxes massively as a platform.The Dems need the white house more than the GOP does. If Bernie Sanders seems to be the only one capable of stopping the Trump train, the party will do what's right.
What the fuck does this mean? This type of shit posting is ridiculous.
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-m...ump/hillary-clinton-obama-birther-fact-check/
If you're gonna imply that she's responsible for that even though there's absolutely no evidence then we might as well start implying that Bernie wanted his supporters to call John Lewis a slave, even though there's no proof of that either.
Rubio delegate pickup tonight? (so far)
0
Feel free to gtfo any time Rubio
yup, hes still losing.Delegate totals - according to NYTimes.
Clinton - 753
Sanders - 541
So yes it's a very difficult uphill battle, where he needs to run up the numbers in a similar fashion to those caucus Northern States where he was able to beat her by a bigger margin. The good news for Sanders is this is a yuge fundraising boost, yuge organizational boost, a change in narrative and a show of momentum. People called me out a long time ago about my posts but this election is different. From here on Bernie has an organizational advantage in most contests. He already has offices in places like Washington with more paid staffers in the State. He has volunteers across the US that self organize, with a big portion actually writing free apps for his campaign. His advantage has always been this - and it has always been hand-waved. Back in the summer when I pointed out the Internet has changed electoral politics - now that advantage is actually finally playing into his hands.
Hilary wins the night.
The good news for Sanders is this is a yuge fundraising boost, yuge
Lol
The media's going to be busting a nut over this for the next week at least
You kidding? They absolutely want a real race, this will be played up beyond belief.
Bernie should stay in the race despite how insurmountable the 200-delegate lead may seem. After all, we all remember Bobby Kennedy was assassinated in June in California.
The biggest problem I have with Sanders is he is promising the moon to a generation that equates likes on Facebook to true activism and change. I'm all for the party moving further left, but when I talk to his supporters they think that in this political climate they'll have a $15+ minimum wage by the end of 2017, free college that summer and we'll flip Washington on its head. It's naive to a fault.
But I can alreday tell that I'm gonna get raked over the coals for being a party pooper, so I'll make my exit.
I will be very very very surprised if Hilary doesn't easily win Illinois. She has ties to the state and is very popular within the traditional blue state.
I still have to give Bernie credit here though, even as a Hillary supporter. If I woke up tomorrow and someone told me that Bernie had won MI, I'd have called bullshit - that lead she had in polls was nigh insurmountable.
If only I had tossed a bunch of cash into the prediction markets...
Hilary wins the night.
Sanders's analysis and presentation does not demonstrate an understanding of this issue. That's why his supporters are predominantly white and frequently male -- because his flavor of progressiveness is non-intersectional and centered on the class-based issues that trouble white America.
Clinton has double the lead in both pledged and super than Obama had at the same point in time.....and the Internet existed in 2008 too. All Bernie can accomplish now is help fashion the overall democratic platform.Delegate totals - according to NYTimes.
Clinton - 753
Sanders - 541
So yes it's a very difficult uphill battle, where he needs to run up the numbers in a similar fashion to those caucus Northern States where he was able to beat her by a bigger margin. The good news for Sanders is this is a yuge fundraising boost, yuge organizational boost, a change in narrative and a show of momentum. People called me out a long time ago about my posts but this election is different. From here on Bernie has an organizational advantage in most contests. He already has offices in places like Washington with more paid staffers in the State. He has volunteers across the US that self organize, with a big portion actually writing free apps for his campaign. His advantage has always been this - and it has always been hand-waved. Back in the summer when I pointed out the Internet has changed electoral politics - now that advantage is actually finally playing into his hands.
Yeah I keep seeing people count states, but that doesn't matter as much as delegates. Even when bernie won 3 out of 4 the other day, the one he lost was big enough that the delegates shifted in Hilarys favor.
Sorry for the tangent, but why are people trying to make yuge a thing? Why?!?!?
It's not particularly complicated. It's been discussed multiple times on this board. Sanders offers a societal analysis which reduces all social issues to economic issues. This is just flat wrong in America, where racial issues dominate economic issues. To the degree that America is backwards in implementing and maintaining social programs, it has deliberately failed to do so to make sure people of color did not benefit. To the degree that America has succeeded in implementing social programs, it has done so in ways that ensured that people of color did not benefit.
Sanders's analysis and presentation does not demonstrate an understanding of this issue. That's why his supporters are predominantly white and frequently male -- because his flavor of progressiveness is non-intersectional and centered on the class-based issues that trouble white America.
No, they didn't? Did you like just fail to read? Go back and check out the exit polls on this issue.
I'm very far left. I'm just also a person of color.
Bernie should stay in the race despite how insurmountable the 200-delegate lead may seem. After all, we all remember Bobby Kennedy was assassinated in June in California.
It's funnier if you're from NY, or know a lot of New Yorkers. At least in my case.
To be fair, Hillary isn't exactly intersectional herself when she wants to uphold rather than transition away from capitalism. An egalitarian society cannot be built without replacing capitalism with socialism - it must be one of the primary planks of an intersectional analysis.
Are you really going there dude? That's not even funny.
And for the record, a scenario like that would almost guarantee the opposite party winning the nomination, hands down.
The biggest problem I have with Sanders is he is promising the moon to a generation that equates likes on Facebook to true activism and change. I'm all for the party moving further left, but when I talk to his supporters they think that in this political climate they'll have a $15+ minimum wage by the end of 2017, free college that summer and we'll flip Washington on its head. It's naive to a fault.
But I can alreday tell that I'm gonna get raked over the coals for being a party pooper, so I'll make my exit.
Bernie should stay in the race despite how insurmountable the 200-delegate lead may seem. After all, we all remember Bobby Kennedy was assassinated in June in California.
Rubio delegate pickup tonight? (so far)
0
Feel free to gtfo any time Rubio
At the federal level, the Democrats have a severe lack of youth. As a result of this, they need to get more names out there that the public can get to know, and more people that could run a campaign in 2020 or 2024.Assuming Clinton does eventually win, she will still have these problems in the general.
Does it not make sense to put Sanders on the ticket as VP? I'm sure this is controversial but it seems like Sanders is a better choice than someone like Castro, which everyone thinks is an inevitability, to address the weaknesses of a Clinton campaign.
Bernie should stay in the race despite how insurmountable the 200-delegate lead may seem. After all, we all remember Bobby Kennedy was assassinated in June in California.
Same thing happened in Obama 2008. I think voters fell for it then but, outside of youth, probably don't trust antiestablishment rhetoric that much anymore. President has a lot of power but not with deadlocked congress.
We all forgot about that, you monster.I'm quoting Queen Hillary Clinton in 2008.
Well the good news is that Bernie won't get crushed anymore. The problem is that even if he keeps winning like he did tonight it won't make up the gap. But if the voters keep him close than he should stay in
Yeah I keep seeing people count states, but that doesn't matter as much as delegates. Even when bernie won 3 out of 4 the other day, the one he lost was big enough that the delegates shifted in Hilarys favor.
I'm very far left. I'm just also a person of color.
nib95 said:So much this. He's put all his eggs in the income inequality basket for so long that his responses outside of that wheelhouse tend to come off pretty bad.
I don't think that's it at all, I think he just realises how intrinsic income equality is to so many countless social factors, and puts a certain degree of priority on it (with good reason). Whilst this research is out of date (and is actually worse off today since such a large portion of the rich essentially continuously got vastly wealthier post economic crash, and with the income inequality gap presently being the highest it's been in the US since the 1920's), I think it's still highly poignant.
Richard Wilkinson: How economic inequality harms societies
Don't attempt to moderate other users, particularly when you don't appear to know what's going on.Step the fuck away from the keyboard....
Yeah, I wonder how many of these knee-jerkers were paying attention in 2008.Post of the night right here. Every time I see someone quote it without understanding the context I smile.
Are you really going there dude? That's not even funny.
And for the record, a scenario like that would almost guarantee the opposite party winning the nomination, hands down.
It's not particularly complicated. It's been discussed multiple times on this board. Sanders offers a societal analysis which reduces all social issues to economic issues. This is just flat wrong in America, where racial issues dominate economic issues. To the degree that America is backwards in implementing and maintaining social programs, it has deliberately failed to do so to make sure people of color did not benefit. To the degree that America has succeeded in implementing social programs, it has done so in ways that ensured that people of color did not benefit.
Sanders's analysis and presentation does not demonstrate an understanding of this issue. That's why his supporters are predominantly white and frequently male -- because his flavor of progressiveness is non-intersectional and centered on the class-based issues that trouble white America.
No, they didn't? Did you like just fail to read? Go back and check out the exit polls on this issue.
I'm very far left. I'm just also a person of color.
You gotta be kidding. The lefty media is definitely pro-Hillary. Just look at the pieces in the daily beast and huffpo the past few weeks. Even tonight on NPR, they were quick to couch the Bernie win as "but he has little chance of winning because delegates".
Gross on her part as well.
Step the fuck away from the keyboard....
At the federal level, the Democrats have a severe lack of youth. As a result of this, they need to get more names out there that the public can get to know, and more people that could run a campaign in 2020 or 2024.
This is what happens when the people decide. How many people have, in previous elections, said "eh, I'm not gonna vote, all the politicians are the same" or "eh, it's a waste of time, voting won't change anything".
Bernie is telling us that if we stand up as a collective, we can accomplish great things.
I'm very happy and proud of what he's accomplished, but it's important to remember that it's not about him. It's about us.