• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Switch 2 Developer claims that "The hardware is very capable"

LectureMaster

Gold Member



A lowkey trusted developer from Install Base responded to an user claiming that Switch 2 wouldn't get AAA games and that the System would be weak and he responded:

It’s not. Both Nintendo and third parties see Switch 2 AAA titles as a big potential growth driver.

The hardware is very capable.

He added:

"I’m not at all saying it’ll get everything always, but I think a lot of people will be pleasantly surprised."

 

Jubenhimer

Member
Switch is capable of running multiplatform games.

Didn't mean it did it well.
This. Nobody expected titles like Doom and Witcher III to come to Switch at all. While they may not be the "best" versions in terms of performance and graphics, they were often perfectly serviceable for what they were.

I imagine Switch 2 will be more of the same, if a little better since third parties won't be late to the party this time.
 

LectureMaster

Gold Member
"Switch 2 very capable of running top graphics AAA games."

What I expect:

black-myth-wukong-pc-game-steam-europe-and-us-and-canada-cover.jpg


What we will get:

GjsfIwn.png
 
Last edited:
The switch 2 will most likely be in between a ps4 pro and series s power wise if i had to guess and that's fine as long as they have a good upscaler at work for their games. Alot of switch games look terrible on a 4k screen and it's because of the resolution and the lack of anti-aliasing which is extremely noticeable on a big tv. I'd also like games to have a locked framerate which i feel like is a fair ask. Otherwise the art style of nintendo games tends to look great by itself and it can cover alot of flaws that realistic looking games otherwise couldn't hide as well.
 
Last edited:

Hero_Select

Member
I mean so long as it's on par (and we expect it to be better than) a Steam Deck then I don't see why not? Steam Deck can already run a lot of AAA games, the Switch 2 will as well.
 

Gaiff

SBI’s Resident Gaslighter
The switch 2 will most likely be in between a ps4 pro and series s power wise if i had to guess and that's fine as long as they have a good upscaler at work for their games. Alot of switch games look terrible on a 4k screen and it's because of the resolution and the lack of anti-aliasing which is extremely noticeable on a big tv. I'd also like games to have a locked framerate which i feel like is a fair ask. Otherwise the art style of nintendo games tends to look great by itself and it can cover alot of flaws that realistic looking games otherwise couldn't hide as well.
A PS4 Pro? I doubt it’s that powerful. Much closer to a base PS4, but with a more advanced feature set and AI upscaling.
 

Zannegan

Member
I'm sure it is very capable. That doesn"t mean it will meet the expectations of forum enthusiasts, but that it's strong enough to get down-ports from current gen consoles, and it'll be a nice jump up for first party Nibtendo games.

DLSS will help, but it's not about to close the gap between $400-500 mobile hardware and a full console in the same price range.
 
Last edited:
A PS4 Pro? I doubt it’s that powerful. Much closer to a base PS4, but with a more advanced feature set and AI upscaling.

If it's close to a base ps4 in terms of graphics then that's pretty pathetic not going to lie especially cause this machine will have to last past the 2030s. I know the switch 2 is portable but good grief that's not even outdated tech, it's prehistoric tech at this stage. I doubt the switch 2 will even hit past 1080p 60fps for alot of games if that's the case.

extremely-outdated-shea-whitney.gif
 

Rat Rage

Member
Switch 2 will be more powerful than Switch 1.
The exact amount of more power won't matter to the average consumer, or better to the vast majority of them.
In fact, in the realm of home consoles, more and more ppl simply don't give a shit about more power (see PS5 Pro - which is a flop).
Switch 2 will sell gangbusters due to Nintendo's first party support.
AAA 3rd parties will find ways of downporting their AAA games to Switch 2 because they don't want to miss out on a lot of sales.
Since graphical deminishing returns are already here, there will be less differences between AAA games and their downported AAA Switch counterparts.
Again, the vast majority of people won't give a shit and more and more ppl will be fine with the downports.

So how much power will the Switch 2 ultimately have? Very simple answer: enough.
 

Haint

Member
I'm expecting docked mode to be something between base Xbox One and base PS4 in raw rasterized performance (an 8nm chip underclocked into the dirt), with DLSS pushing upsampled resolutions a little higher, and of course a much better CPU than those Jaguar cores. You can bastardized 99% of current gen games and most future titles to to run on that level of hardware. The old ass Steamdeck already runs 95% of games with little to no special porting efforts required.
 
Last edited:
I mean, no one is going to claim it's incapable

Considering what it is, I'm sure the hardware will be just fine for 99% of gamers just as the Switch was

GAF is a tiny miniscule minority of gamers after all
 

Haint

Member
I'm expecting it to be somewhere between a Super Nintendo and a 5090

LOL mistype, I meant base PS4.

Should be more powerful than asus rog ally x

The Z1 Extreme is nearing 9 dual mode teraflops (which is ~4.3 TF's by the single mode metric PS4/Xbone/PS5/Series use). The most pie in the sky hopium for Switch 2 places it around 4.5 dual mode teraflops (~2.2TF by the single mode metric of PS4/Xbone/PS5/Series). And those pie in the sky figures require a 5nm or smaller node clocked to nearly 1.5Ghz. The more likely 8nm @ ~800Ghz figure would produce around 2.5 dual mode teraflops (or 1.25 single mode teraflops). Though supporting dual mode would bump the real world raster performance to somewhere around 1.6TF's, hence why I say somewhere between base Xbox Ones and base PS4.
 
Last edited:
Very capable of what? That sentence could mean absolutely anything. The switch was "very capable" and got ports of Fifa, TW3, DOOM, etc.
 

dano1

A Sheep
Switch 2 will be more powerful than Switch 1.
The exact amount of more power won't matter to the average consumer, or better to the vast majority of them.
In fact, in the realm of home consoles, more and more ppl simply don't give a shit about more power (see PS5 Pro - which is a flop).
Switch 2 will sell gangbusters due to Nintendo's first party support.
AAA 3rd parties will find ways of downporting their AAA games to Switch 2 because they don't want to miss out on a lot of sales.
Since graphical deminishing returns are already here, there will be less differences between AAA games and their downported AAA Switch counterparts.
Again, the vast majority of people won't give a shit and more and more ppl will be fine with the downports.

So how much power will the Switch 2 ultimately have? Very simple answer: enough.
Not enough to be a one console system. You might not care about having power to run games at 4k without slowdown but I and many gamers do.
 
Not enough to be a one console system. You might not care about having power to run games at 4k without slowdown but I and many gamers do.
You are still a minority, ask the 146 million switch users. Anyway we have to see how the hardware behaves, especially with DLSS, at least the horrible image quality of switch games on modern TVs shouldn't be a problem.
 

Dr.D00p

Member
I don't think Switch would need more than 10GB if most games will run at 1080p.

Big, open world games need lots of RAM.

10GB isn't much when you have to split that between level data and model textures and those textures will have to be of a decent quality to look good in the Switch's 4K docked mode.

...and using DLSS comes with additional memory demands.
 
I don't think Switch would need more than 10GB if most games will run at 1080p.
Competent devs will sure make good use of it, but if you take into consideration that we live in times where clueless juniors are running the show at the big publishers dev teams, all they really can do is press a compile button in UE5 and have the thing eat away at godless amounts of resources. Nintendo would be wise to eat the cost and go with 16GB or something, but these cheap fucks know very well their loyal customer base buys every piece of shit they spit into the market, so ...
 

Cakeboxer

Member
I would be more than happy with Series S power because i would only use it on my tv, but once again i would have to pay the hybrid tax and it's something Xbox One.
 
Top Bottom