You and I think I heard a rather the people who give me a more appropriate answer than listen to me is good, because it is a hard question to answer publicly me for such hard I though I'm (to answer).
If you would answer seriously, then looks to be long (
http://goo.gl/59bbU) at the same level as that answer the question of game balance so and the other day.
> Recent game feels like it is made for the self-satisfaction of the hand making.
↑
I think this "self-satisfaction of the builder" comes true, then is not on the market in the world quite endlessly if I continue making.
I do may seem that creating what they endlessly convinced, it is possible to self-realization is to be.
In order of game you want to achieve as a creator, (development costs as well, and laughs) time it cause I want above all.
Oh, though, "depending on the sense of self-satisfaction" of course.
> Harada do you maybe make a game for everyone?
> Is it such for the user, seemingly for yourself.
This I though I would did you answer that was different also, if it is time to question the 20's.
Aside the order in which they write from now, these four "customer", "shareholder", "company" and "your (or family)", and broadly classified by the game to make but I'm up to this if you be happy.
However, it is not difficult it is to achieve this from me, all well aligned balance.
Align such as two such as one of these four elements is the'm able to easily once or twice.
In order to properly align all four, (and I'm originally thought) and it any I'm not supposed to become a victim.
I think the happiness of four, there is also happiness What fun of the game, there is money (profit), to be a great success making hand such as do not break the body, that is if they meet properly the one happy 4 different in each.
It is difficult to achieve this, because of difficult to take balance Stated differently, where toll or gone? There is a situation that occurs me.
There may also be seen in the medium to long term, shall prevail at that time by the change.
What some of you do not change the absolute, is that you should not change the priority of there in terms of know everyone of course really.
However, as a result, even that Jan does not know when you see from the side! Can look me are many and there will be, but somewhere out of the balance of these four It looks are you collapse it.
And then will no longer lead and then when I have I thought - do you have the audience even profitable.
Or even, reputation of the game is good, even if profitable, it will not lead then make hand if I fall down, I such as.
You might think it or "good dead if you make what the user is pleased with".
Good stuff terribly is made temporarily, users will be happy, companies investor also even profitable, After the builder has fallen, from the perspective of one of the four perspectives that too, which is also made of place to say BigbosS_3pw kun so I do become self-satisfaction of hand.
And if I do how Uri unprofitable such as mechanisms unprofitable reputation of the game is at best very, shareholders who becomes unhappy, the company I'll get crushed following let alone not make investment is reduced.
It is a translation There are many extreme example like the above well, but I was trying to balance such difficult anyway but did not work, the toll somewhere these four results. I think and Moraeru imagine from that, and if they can realize that there are the various perspectives and patterns and a portion of "for whom". There, you can ask them to bite is the nature of the original that creator has (including etc. I wish would be happy everyone I want to make of such, and I want to play for such, I wish I could be of such, if you do this people, and Zhi), I think Only then and you know if you have to imagine you can reverse a variety of case studies.
--- I'm sorry in terribly boring answer that.
You are listening carefully "rude very suddenly, And I would ask a question of long but. Please forgive me," and I, and from me, "What Harada's not caught in the immigration and customs?" Or something better to be a "really rude question" is'm easy (laughs).
RT @ BigbosS_3pw:
Good evening Mr. Harada. Rude very suddenly, yet I would ask a question of long, but please forgive me.
Harada Do you maybe make a game for everyone?
Is it such for the user, seemingly for yourself.
For the second year in college now, has never played some old games like a game from the old days from the effects of my parents.
I have wanted to work related to the game something in the future, but I feel the question the way of recent games.
For example, delivery of bug fixes and sale of paid DLC on-line of the game hard.
I think that is a system that benefits very in that it can deliver as paid DLC the minute you do not fit in the media really, delivery patch for the bug unexpected that it can be.
Recently, however, it is not said to feel you lie down the company name, game name, but to have the so-called "DLC Code" or clearly manufacturer or "debug", was released while there is a bug problem that notice just to play normally I feel such games as have been many. I think the people of the creator and has produced it hard, but if from the user, if it says it is not a "unfinished product".
You would think, There might be a thought for bugs and glitches, the "will do just fine and Guess patch".
This time the content of "game" has been established, a recent game feels like it is made for the self-satisfaction of the hand making.
The is that it can not be helped, I know to say to Mr. Harada, but I was allowed to post want to receive your comments on the Harada is the position of the "creator".
We have long rude.