• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Terrorist attack in London [up: 6 people killed, ~50 injured, 3 attackers dead]

I just dont understand how people can BECOME like this. I dont get how so many of them turn to such brutal and savage murdering of freaking children, how they can pull out blades and stab people.
 
They need these...

ConcretePylonInstallationWestAllis_1.JPG

Yep, and I'll say other countries, including the US, need to be proactive and get on that as well. After Nice, terrorists have seen how effective (and I hate using that word here) a big truck can be for their purposes.

Problem is, as others have said, those things ain't cheap to install all over. Not cheap at all.
 

RiggyRob

Member
My mum (still in the UK) just sent me a text saying there's an incident 500 yards away from where the Manchester benefits concert is being held.

I've seen nothing on this at all. Anyone confirm?

Police cordoned off a petrol station with around 15 officers, but I'm not sure how close it is to the MEN arena. It was mentioned earlier in the thread.

Manchester Evening News should have live updates on it though.
 
I'm pretty sure calling a cop a cunt is far from casual. Much like how you wouldn't call a cop a pig, bacon, etc.

You could call policeman a cunt in the UK if you want to, you wouldn't get shot or anything I don't think.

I don't personally go around calling police cunts, but it's really not unheard of.
 

2MF

Member
The only problems are in the Vauxhall / London Bridge area right?

I'm around Camden and going out to walk my dog which should be OK I think... rather far from the trouble area.
 

Condom

Member
What can you really do to prevent attacks of this nature?

You can't. It's better to work on the source of the attacks and improving the 'reaction' to such attacks (learning people how to behave, improve logistics etc) than to think of more security measures. Look at cities like Baghdad or Kabul, they have great security measures but at some point stuff just is going to happen.
Modern society is and will always be vulnerable to such attacks unless we have a full 1984 mind reading totalitarian state at which point it isn't like modern society anymore.
 
D

Deleted member 231381

Unconfirmed Member
Police confirm multiple fatalities. :(
 

Rktk

Member
The only problems are in the Vauxhall / London Bridge area right?

I'm around Camden and going out to walk my dog which should be OK I think... rather far from the trouble area.
My brother is out in Camden right now...
 

Xando

Member
In addition to what's been stated, police have also repeatedly voted against being armed as a standard. They literally do not want to be wielding firearms.

Jesus though. Guess the security level won't be coming down anytime soon...
Have they voted on Tasers? Seems like a good compromise for these stabbing incidents.
 

DragoonKain

Neighbours from Hell
If there are multiple incidents going on at once, you have to think coordinated attacks. Hopefully they can figure out how they communicated to track down whoever is involved in these.
 
Thanks! But that is not enough to deal with terrorists, of course.

Arguable. I wouldn't be surprised if the next couple of years may see a reform in officers within certain metropolitan city centres being granted more access to firearms, but that is in and of itself a very slippery slope. I'd argue firearms in the hands of the officers on the bridge (according to reports) may have minimised casualties and fatalities if they were quick enough to respond, but it certainly wouldn't deter any terrorist at all, which is part of dealing with this.
 

Meadows

Banned
I live right next to the incident in Manchester. It happened like 3 hours ago and the petrol station reopened since.

It was an arrest rather than anything more sinister. It seems unlikely they were connected.
 
Arguable. I wouldn't be surprised if the next couple of years may see a reform in officers within certain metropolitan city centres being granted more access to firearms, but that is in and of itself a very slippery slope. I'd argue firearms in the hands of the officers on the bridge (according to reports) may have minimised casualties and fatalities if they were quick enough to respond, but it certainly wouldn't deter any terrorist at all, which is part of dealing with this.

It could easily result in friendly fire and innocent suspects being shot. It's not the solution.
 

budpikmin

Member
The only problems are in the Vauxhall / London Bridge area right?

I'm around Camden and going out to walk my dog which should be OK I think... rather far from the trouble area.

It's ongoing mate. If you're anywhere in central London tonight really you should stay inside
 

mrklaw

MrArseFace
If there are multiple incidents going on at once, you have to think coordinated attacks. Hopefully they can figure out how they communicated to track down whoever is involved in these.

London Bridge is literally next door to borough market and it sounds like those two are the same people involved - van on Bridge and then people coming out with knives into borough market. So two locations reported but (likely) one attack

Also borough market is a nightmare to secure. Multiple entrances, quite a maze inside and lots of side streets coming off from there.
 

TTOOLL

Member
It could easily result in friendly fire and innocent suspects being shot. It's not the solution.

Of course guns are not the solution to terrorism, they just a way to end the menace faster after it happened. Provided you have police around the place.

Anyway, what's the solution in your opinion?
 

Belker

Member
Why not? London has a history with terrorism (IRA), didn't change anything. You don't need guns in public for safety. They have special forces which of course are armed.

Without commenting on whether the police should/shouldn't carry guns, bear in mind the IRA attacks were quite different.

I London, I don't recall them attacking people on the streets - apart from a couple of ambushes. Instead they bombed places and sometimes called in bomb threats themselves.

Not sure it's a like for like comparison about what tools to use.
 
It could easily result in friendly fire and innocent suspects being shot. It's not the solution.

Exactly my view on it. Firearms would simply be a distraction, a quick-fix to show we're 'dealing' with terrorism, but truth be told any action that can be taken cannot counter-act low-tech attacks like this. Any that do would be incidental at best.
 
I'm pretty sure calling a cop a cunt is far from casual. Much like how you wouldn't call a cop a pig, bacon, etc.

You've obviously not been out in a city centre in an evening when drunk people are about! I go out maybe 4 times a year and even then you commonly see drunks gesturing insults at cops, making pig noises, shouting jibes at them, so i'm not in the slightest bit surprised by the drunks and the police's reaction

The live footage from sky, where the police are directing civilians out of the area with their hands over their heads (for obvious reasons) and you can tell who is drunk as people put their hands down, some even seem to be smiling and laughing as they are too drunk to grasp the reality - its really odd and just goes to show why the police are so forceful with people in bars and/or drunk, they need to baby them and show authority

This is just awful, i don't know what more can be done,there is a fine line between infringing rights of individuals and allowing people who could be terrorists their freedom where they can slip through the net

thankfully it might seem the Vauxhall incident isn't terror related and was just a normal "crime" that just got scooped up by the terror police as they had to be extremely vigilant
 
Top Bottom