Herr Schwarz
Banned
I wouldn't want to chance it lol. I'd jump rather than getting stabbed by an attacker...
I'd go jack bauer on the fucker
I wouldn't want to chance it lol. I'd jump rather than getting stabbed by an attacker...
What freedoms are you personally willing to give up?
Or do you just want to remove freedoms from others?
I'm here in London vacation. It's crazy with all the sirens.
I was originally planning on doing Tower of London and Borough Market/Maltby St tomorrow morning. I already got my tickets. Not sure what now.
Poor London.
We need more people like you.
Yeah, in a panic with nowhere to go, jumping to get away from an attacker doesn't sound that crazy to me also. Hope the person survived it.
Authorities are too afraid to close down mosques were extremist views and hatred is being preached, and stop the money flow from the Middle-east that funds it. This is something that has been repeated over here at least for years by multiple organisations, and even by Muslims themselves. Don't know if the UK has the same problem, but there cracking down on those things would be a good idea.
I'd bet the likelihood of your life being saved my paramedics after a stabbing is higher than not drowning/freezing to death, personally. Especially at night.
Keep pretending that is the solution. As if the middle east has anything to do with terrorist attacks in China and India by muslims, Indonesia or the attacks in Kenya and Nigeria etc. Additionally, killers like those in thr Boston bombings were White Russian/Dagestani who had no connection to the Middle East. It is just an easy scapegoat to say they do this because of their muslim brothers and sisters in Iraq or Afghanistan or Palestine.
So many are saying better integration and assimilation. You think the Sikhs in the UK or the black/caribbean/african population in the UK doesn't face the same discrimination or integration problems. Why are they not doing the attacks?
Care to share your magical non-racist solution or are you just going to be vague?
With "solution" you mean a temporary stop gap that isn't even guaranteed to do anything positive?
This is why the travel ban makes no sense. They already have people well established in the countries that they want to attack, no need for anyone to travel.
We can't. It's gonna keep happening, and we have to live with it (or be killed by it). There's no fixing this. Some people just want to see us die.
I don't have a solution. It's not my job. It's May's job, what's she going to do though? Say "We will not be beaten" and not do shit.
We are being beaten though, people will keep dying and it's probably going to get worse.
How about we stop overthrowing foreign governments and end our aid to Israel and Saudi Arabia.
Keep pretending that is the solution. As if the middle east has anything to do with terrorist attacks in China and India by muslims, Indonesia or the attacks in Kenya and Nigeria etc. Additionally, killers like those in thr Boston bombings were White Russian/Dagestani who had no connection to the Middle East. It is just an easy scapegoat to say they do this because of their muslim brothers and sisters in Iraq or Afghanistan or Palestine.
So many are saying better integration and assimilation. You think the Sikhs in the UK or the black/caribbean/african population in the UK doesn't face the same discrimination or integration problems. Why are they not doing the attacks?
People being run over and stabbed, and yet people here are posting about how a curse word hasn't been edited out of a video?
Not leaking information to the press of the following police/security services investigation would be a good start.
There isn't really a solution.
It's a catch 22. Look at liberia and syria. If you dont intervene you condone human right violations and torture and killings .. if you intervene you destroy infrastructure, kill innocents and create a vacuum that spawns terror cells.
Both outcomes are shit.
What a stupid post lol! Is this sarcasm?
You know precisely what I mean. Not the time to be acting the smart-arse.
AP: BREAKING: Prime Minister Theresa May says London incident being treated as a 'potential act of terrorism'
------
![]()
He's about to touch bigger and brighter orbs with he Arabs I am sure that will help tremendously.I hear Trump is on the case.
I'm not saying we shouldn't intervene - because I don't know my opinion - but why the Middle East and not North Korea, parts of Africa, countries in South America, etc...It's a catch 22. Look at liberia and syria. If you dont intervene you condone human right violations and torture and killings .. if you intervene you destroy infrastructure, kill innocents and create a vacuum that spawns terror cells.
Both outcomes are shit.
Tower of London should be fine. It's further down the river and I expect there will be more security around that whole area. It's possible borough market will be closed tomorrow though
There is, but it would be too extreme and it would take out human rights hard.
Dont think that will change much, these people are hidden from mainstream muslims. Something needs to be done, im at the point now where we really need to think about certain freedoms.
What freedoms are you personally willing to give up?
Or do you just want to remove freedoms from others?
Possibly greater powers to arrest people based on 'thought crimes' ie people with extremist views, people that sympathise with a terrorist cause, these should all be possible reasons to arrest/jail people. Sympathisers are well versed in what they can and cant say, they setup stalls irritating everyone (even muslims) with thier obvious intent, i dont think we should allow these people to engage, just imprison them & rehabilitate. The later maybe fairytale nonsense, but ofcourse we cant let these people free on our streets
Ethered.Some trolling to slightly lighten the mood.
![]()
https://twitter.com/NBCNightlyNews/status/871144729760722944
I don't have a solution. It's not my job. Who gives a damn what I think. It's May's job, what's she going to do though? Say "We will not be beaten" and not do shit.
We are being beaten though, people will keep dying and it's probably going to get worse.
Nah. It's all blocked. Tower Bridge is literally opposite London Bridge.
Btw, I was on the road around then, and we had signs saying to avoid London Bridge with maybe 15 minutes.. probably less..
Go Smart Traffic signs.
My friend went to Vauxhall tonight and I couldn't contact her. She just sent me a message and she is ok, got me worried for while...
You people bringing up Trump are equally disrespectful to the victims and their friends/family. He doesn't need any spotlight regarding to this, this thread isn't about him. Nobody gives a shit what he tweets. Find another thread to bash that idiot, thank you.
Yep, I'm sure camera footage is going stop a vehicle randomly accelerating and swerving off-road... You can't predict this form of attack.
If someone chooses to cause an accident on the road, they can anywhere, and you're pretty naive if you think otherwise.
Some trolling to slightly lighten the mood.
![]()
https://twitter.com/NBCNightlyNews/status/871144729760722944
I suspect this is a part of protocol - treating it as potential terrorism unlocks a number of legal and resource powers if I remember correctly, especially regarding the amount of time a person can be arrested before being charged.
What a stupid post lol! Is this sarcasm?
Some trolling to slightly lighten the mood.
![]()
https://twitter.com/NBCNightlyNews/status/871144729760722944
Some trolling to slightly lighten the mood.
![]()
https://twitter.com/NBCNightlyNews/status/871144729760722944
But that doesn't stop random attacks like this, unless you want someone following them 24/7.You monitor radicalized individuals, keep tabs on them, follow them around, question them, they try anything, you take them out on the spot.
This isn't just some random person deciding to run over people because of road rage, this is a terrorist that fits a specific profile, and it takes time to muster the balls to run people down, we need to get these people off the streets before they try anything.
Possibly greater powers to arrest people based on 'thought crimes' ie people with extremist views, people that sympathise with a terrorist cause, these should all be possible reasons to arrest/jail people. Sympathisers are well versed in what they can and cant say, they setup stalls irritating everyone (even muslims) with thier obvious intent, i dont think we should allow these people to engage, just imprison them & rehabilitate. The later maybe fairytale nonsense, but ofcourse we cant let these people free on our streets
Starting in 2012, 34 people went from Aarhus to Syria. As far as the police know, six were killed and 10 are still over there. Of the 18 who came back home, all showed up in Aarslev and Link's office, as did hundreds of other potential radicals in Aarhus about 330 in total.
But the program is admired for another accomplishment: Since the initial exodus of young people, very few have left from Aarhus for Syria, even when traffic from the rest of Europe was spiking. Last year, in 2015, it was just one person.
No, that would not be a solution. It would be counter-productive.