vas_a_morir said:
Very mature. My point was that despite the seemingly random nature of the tourney, where we often praise these "cinderella stories," the "blue-bloods" seem to win with greater frequency than in the BCS, which is both surprising and interesting. While Kansas, Duke, UNC, and potentially Kentucky will be the most recent champions, teams like Notre Dame, Oklahoma, and Michigan have not seen comparable success in at least a decade. Furthermore, I said that "it seems," which is a personal statement that in no way argues factual accuracy of my opinion. "Chicago seems bigger than LA." Some might say that. But, I'm not going to go throw down an encyclopedia at somebody and say "What the fuck was your point again?" On the other hand, I'm not a total-wiener.
I'm only 25% wiener. I think the main difference here is that a team like VCU and Butler has more than a theorhetical chance to win the NCAA championship, at this point its two games and if they win thats all they have to do. Not so for "cinderella" teams like Utah, Boise St, TCU, they will not get the opportunity if they lose one game in the regular season, they are out of the conversation.
Duke, UNC, UK, KU etc, are no different than Bama, TOSU, Texas, UF in football. They get the best talent in their respective sports, they play in the high power conferences, they get the media attention, the odds will shake out more often than not that these are the schools that will play for the title.
Sorry for the "fuck" in my response, but its not the first time that somebody had called out the NCAA tourney for determining a champion in comparison to the CFB BCS method and I take a bit of umbrage with that. Both have their flaws, the tourney can be too random and sometimes the absolute best team doesn't win. The BCS system ignores that a team that takes a loss or 2 in September or October can improve to contender status by November or bowl season. Bama had 3 loses last year but they certainly had the ability to beat Auburn or even Oregon. The worst that happens to Duke for blowing a regular season game is they may get a lower seed or they may be sent to a different bracket. The both are what they are, but the mid majors time is coming faster in basketball than it is in football simply because the elite talent in CFB has to stay longer.
EDIT: I also don't know the last CFB Champion that wouldn't be considered a "blue blood" or traditional power. The current system certain favors them more than the NCAA tourney.