![]()
And we're just behind Poland, and North Ireland and Cuba and Hungary and well almost the rest of the first world. All of whom pay much less in healthcare.
This does not necessarily represent shortcomings in healthcare at all.
![]()
And we're just behind Poland, and North Ireland and Cuba and Hungary and well almost the rest of the first world. All of whom pay much less in healthcare.
This.
Sometimes I love Canada.
It is invalid paranoia and they are shortsighted.
AARP actually came out in support of Obamacare and they lost thousand of members for it. It's crazy how closed minded people are on this topic.
Sometimes I don't understand these types of comments. Don't Canadians pay really high taxes so the healthcare is "free"??? So technically it isn't because all citizens are paying it through taxes, you just don't get charged on the spot when you get out of the hospital.
At least that's what I understood?
This does not necessarily represent shortcomings in healthcare at all.
Sometimes I don't understand these types of comments. Don't Canadians pay really high taxes so the healthcare is "free"??? So technically it isn't because all citizens are paying it through taxes, you just don't get charged on the spot when you get out of the hospital.
At least that's what I understood?
How is that a worse option? It's cheaper for everyone in the end..
How is that a worse option? It's cheaper for everyone in the end..
Isnt that a myth?Sometimes I don't understand these types of comments. Don't Canadians pay really high taxes so the healthcare is "free"??? So technically it isn't because all citizens are paying it through taxes, you just don't get charged on the spot when you get out of the hospital.
Pardon my ignorance, AARP ?
Yeah I mean as I say, I try to listen to their reason but I cant seem to fathom it at all.
....lol this whole time i thought child birth was free.
But you're still paying...it really isn't free like a lot of people claim. I'm not arguing it's a worse system to use.
AARP = American Association of Retired Persons. It is probably the single most powerful citizens' group in the USA. They have enormous lobbying influence and no political decision gets made that affects people over the age of 55 without taking the AARP into account. People aged 55+ in the USA tend to be far more politically involved and vote in larger numbers than other age groups. AARP has a lot of influence over its own members, they'll vote how they're told and support/protest legislation as they're told. For there to have been a rebellion over AARP supporting Obamacare shows how deeply ingrained it is in those peoples' heads that health care form, universal health care reform, whatever you want to call it = evil socialism.
The weird part is that same demographic can't get enough Medicare and Social Security. Basically they want all the social entitlements for themselves.
In first-world countries, it is.
But you're still paying...it really isn't free like a lot of people claim. Also I'm not arguing it's a worse system to use, it's obviously the superior one, just speaking about those who claim it's free.
Of course youre still paying. Youre just not paying 100-200 bucks a month for insurance, 500 dollar co-pays, and any expenses that your insurance doesnt cover at the point of service, which can be A LOT
Paying for it all through taxes (and spending less money doing it) while covering everyone is a no-brainer. I just can't fathom how anyone would be opposed to universal health care
US is totally third world right? Derp.
More money that gets spent = better for the economy? That would be my guess, idk
From what I can tell, that report mostly concludes that the main reason the US lags is due to a lot of trash in the system, which is something I would agree with. I do not believe that physicians in the US are any worse than international physicians, however from this it seems to me that a lot of the problems rely in the extraneous costs: administration, unnecessary expenditures, etc.
Sometimes I don't understand these types of comments. Don't Canadians pay really high taxes so the healthcare is "free"??? So technically it isn't because all citizens are paying it through taxes, you just don't get charged on the spot when you get out of the hospital.
At least that's what I understood?
Its better for insurance, drug, and medical companies, for sure, but its not better for the average citizen, and the average citizen is what drives our economy. We save money on health care, the average citizen would still spend that money buying things. They just wouldnt spend it on health care. They'd spend it on other things that they need/want
Buying things would be better for our economy due to diversity instead enriching one sector of our economy
Nope. Americans actually pay more taxes to fund their healthcare than Canadians i.e the American government pays more for health care per capita than the Canadian government.
and us not covering 50 million citizens when every other country covers all of their citizens for much lower costs
And yetI'm currently on the Obstetrics and Gynecology service. The amount of resources that go into delivering a single baby is ridiculous. On average, a mother will stay in the hospital for 2 days after delivery. These rooms are usually single rooms or a double room. Never large wards. Includes 3 meals a day, TV, frequent visits by doctors, nurses, social workers, legal staff. During this time, the infant gets an extensive medical work up including genetic, blood, and physical testing. This is just after the birth.
The birthing process usually has a doctor and several support staff and takes a few hours. An anesthesiologist is frequently involved to give nerve blocks/epidurals.
Before the child is even born and the patient is in labor, frequent pelvic exams and vital sign monitoring is taking place to try and spearhead any possible complications that arise.
Not to mention...this is a 24 hour operation with no scheduled breaks. If you ask me, the high cost is well justified.
Hell of a job they're all doing.
When it comes to health care, it sure is
Indeed. I'd argue that efficiency is a huge problem that we need to deal with. Like your report says, a lot of money gets blown on stupid things, like 6 figure salaries for health administrators and unneeded testing with expensive equipment (MRIs etc).
I still don't think this concludes that US physicians are any worse. If anything, they are being raised in a system that does not promote checklists and efficiency, which I'd bet is something accentuated in the other 6 countries. Furthermore, a lot of wasteful maneuvers (like those expensive scans) are not inherently due to physicians' incompetence, but because the US is a society that loves malpractice. To not use a costly scan could mean that 1% chance you missed something, and a high chance of being sued.
so because its expensive = third world. ok.
And yet
Hell of a job they're all doing.
But you're still paying...it really isn't free like a lot of people claim. Also I'm not arguing it's a worse system to use, it's obviously the superior one, just speaking about those who claim it's free.
I'll give you an example of Health Care misfortunes
I have no Insurance, I can't qualify for any governmental assistance due to me being an illegal immigrant
I had an abscess on my right index finger, it grew to huge bulb, that literally started leaking
I went to Elmhurst (Local) Hospital, had to go to Emergency, which then was given a 1 week wait to see a doctor in the Hand department
Went to see him, he did some tests, needed surgery
2 weeks went buy till my surgery date for it
My procedure roughly came it to $5000+
I had to go to war to get it down, it came out to roughly $200 when all shit was said and done
Luckily Elmhurst has an amnesty program in place for these kind of situations
I don't go to the hospital because of the exorbitant fees
I have done multiple self removals (help of my mother) of In-Grown Toe Nails
If I go to the hospital its a $1,000 charge just to see a doctor in the emergency room
(Amnesty Program does not always kick in)
Lol ok, well then the Amenable death rate certainly is and the us fares just as poorly there tooThis does not necessarily represent shortcomings in healthcare at all.
They should raise the price, get less people born.
I know, I know. Mom had cable in the room, didn't have to miss Honey Boo Boo.![]()
Derp.
Lol ok, well then the Amenable death rate certainly is and the us fares just as poorly there too
How much does it actually cost to deliver a baby?
Question, why are you guys (or you know americans who are) opposed to a system like the NHS ?
Amenable death: "deaths from certain causes before age 75 that are potentially preventable with timely and effective health care".
OH MY GOD are you telling me that when people have less access to primary care and mostly rely on emergency care that they are more likely to die from preventable causes? NO WAY.
"Personal responsibility and freedom."
"Just get a better job with health benefits. I did it and so can you."
"Fuck you, got mine."
$10,000+. The hospital charges the mother, then after the baby is born, they charge the baby, too.
Again, it is entirely possible (I'd argue likely) that this reflects lifestyle, prior access to healthcare, etc. rather than second-rate treatment.