Regardless, good talk. I appreciate these discussions. We can debate polarizing and sensitive topics without flying off the handle and resorting to insults and name-calling.
You mad bro because you sound like a big snowflake. Im not on either side of crybaby behavior. You people are just as bad as the crazy purple folk.
www.ubisoft.com
super mad bro. help me!
No, it hasn't. All I've seen are links to 30 minute videos that flip flop on the accuracy of seasons or clothing or what have you and you saying "it's blatantly obvious".
Bit of cop out, don't you think? If you are going to bring up Thomas Lockley's fraud as the coup de grace in this discussion, you should be able to approximate whether or not the entire argument hinged on his word or Wikipedia edits (lmao) in the first place. But that's the thing about these discussions; everybody becomes an expert on niche subjects when they have a point to push.
Yes of course, back when they started building the lore to suffuse the entire history of the world with literal ancient aliens conspiracy.
You mean this game? lol. Being inaccurate is like the entire foundation of series.
Constantinople had been captured and pillaged by the westerners/latins way before 1453. Ottoman Empire's conquests weren't particularly more brutal compared to other empires throughout history be it western or eastern. Empires and conquest aren't about being good or evil. It's all about perspectives and prejudices.
The problem here seems to be that this has reached levels that can possibly actually do some harm, apparently people are tampering with Wikipedia (to make it look like Yasuke was 100% confirmed to be a samurai and such) due to this shit and even the Japanese government has started to investigate the situation. And all this started because some idiots started a petition to cancel the game due to the misrepresentation of Japan...
Because giving crybullies any attention was a mistake and Ubisoft keeps skipping on this.
i think he means, if we can't have a re5 remake, we can't have this game out. what this have to do with Yasuke? well, legend says he would be offended by that re game if he was alive today.
Yeah this was an eye-opener for me. Can’t believe all the things they got wrong when he walk through the trailer and pause and talk about details. The blooming trees and fruit in the wrong season, the village gate that is only used for shrines, corruption not being a thing yet, villagers bowing and more. Makes you wonder what historians they hired for research.
That's because Ubisoft still thinks a female protagonist-only would tank the game. Kassandra and female Eivor are clearly supposed to be the protagonists but they let the player choose a male.
If you re-read my post, the only thing I'm bringing up for possible dispute (because I don't know actually know the answer) is whether or not Lockley's fraud ends the debate one way or another. The problem isn't bringing it up, it's bringing it up in the frame of "this means everything that you say and what Ubisoft has done (as if they knew about his fraud), is entirely invalid!"
Dude, there's no unified approvals system that's ratifying which games are okay or otherwise.
Agreed. The game is an obvious DEI pandering. That is the only reason to do it.
I know the reason but it’s just absurd, it becomes comical, like he’s a trans or being mocked for acting like a woman. There is almost no gender neutral names at all in the nordic region and Eivor is certainly not that. They just can’t take that shortcut. They should’ve pulled in the voice actors again and given him a proper man’s name.
Or just make a game in Africa dealing with African empires and civilizations? Kush, Aksum, Songhai...there are options that have never been remotely explored.
tech4gamers.com
Assassin's Creed Shadows Seemingly Confirms Naoe & Yasuke Are LGBTQ+
Assassin's Creed Shadows may allow both its main characters to engage in LGBTQ+ relationships like past Ubisoft RPGs.
