Darko said:and best director
and best screenplay
And best supporting actor.
Darko said:and best director
and best screenplay
vatstep said:There absolutely has to be one more film. The way the arc has gone so far, it really IS quite similar to the original Star Wars trilogy, and I just can't see Nolan ending things on such a bleak note. Whereas BB was triumphant, TDK was the complete opposite; Joker ultimately won. But you have to think that after Ledger's death, Nolan's stance might've changed a bit, and not just because Ledger may have been planned to star in the third film; I can't imagine how such an untimely death like his could effect a director. Though a third film might not even be Nolan's decision... not sure about contracts and whatnot.
Regarding Dent: I was pretty shocked that he died. I was almost certain they'd introduce him late in the film and have him be a "carry-over" to the potential next one. But I think it was a good move, in the end; you can only have a character be so motivated and so evil due to lost love for a short while before it gets corny. But in all, Eckhart's performance was great, and the effects on Two-Face were fucking unreal.
Let's not go that far. Not yet at least.ezekial45 said:The more i think about the movie, the more i believe it should have a shot for Best Picture at the oscars.
Yeah but for a while it seemed as if he was right, for example when all the civilians were trying to kill that one Wayne Enterprises guy who was going to reveal Batmans identity.woodchuck said:I wouldn't say that the Joker ultimately won. Batman's sacrifice led to Harvey Dent dieing as a martyr and not a murderer (as the Joker wanted).
Joker said that "when the chips are down, these civilized people will eat each other (or something like that)". But neither ferry was willing to blow up the other ferry. It showed that there is still some sanity and good in Gotham's people - the complete opposite of what the Joker wanted.
DEFINITELYezekial45 said:The more i think about the movie, the more i believe it should have a shot for Best Picture at the oscars.
Raguel said:Let's not go that far. Not yet at least.
ezekial45 said:I know it's still early, but based on what i've seen so far this year, this is easily the best. At this point, i'd say it has a shot for a nomination.
you are getting far too ahead of yourself. Maggie and Bale have a 0% of being nominated and best picture and best director are a long shot at best still.woodchuck said:the question isn't if it will win best picture (that's a given). the question is if it will beat the record of 11 oscars.
Locks:
best pic
best director
best actor (bale)
best supporting actor (ledger)
best actress (maggie)
best screenplay
best editing
best cinematography
best original score
best make-up
best sound
maybe:
best supporting actress (ballerina)
I think if TDK can manage to get the best supporting actress award early on, it'll have a 100% shot of getting 12 oscars
Cheebs said:you are getting far too ahead of yourself. Maggie and Bale have a 0% of being nominated and best picture and best director are a long shot at best still.
Lonestar said:I think you are totally off base, and I believe with ABSOLUTE CLARITY, that they will rename the Best Actor and Actress awards, to the HEY PAUL and SECRETARY SLAPASS Awards.
Cheebs said:you are getting far too ahead of yourself. Maggie and Bale have a 0% of being nominated and best picture and best director are a long shot at best still.
WRONG! The dark knight will win every category including best documentary, best foreign picture, animated film, best short film, and even best song!Cheebs said:you are getting far too ahead of yourself. Maggie and Bale have a 0% of being nominated and best picture and best director are a long shot at best still.
Raguel said:WRONG! The dark knight will win every category including best documentary, best foreign picture, animated film, best short film, and even best song!
Raguel said:and even best song!
Everything makes sense when you bet on the Joker! It's all part of the plan.DMczaf said:At the time I thought the Joker/Batman musical number in the interrogation room was out of place, but now it all makes sense.
suaveric said:Would something like this be up for original screenplay or adapted? Technically it's an original story, but it's based on characters that other people have come up with.
ezekial45 said:It would be for adapted.
suaveric said:That could be a good way to go with the Riddler. But the problem is that even with that take, it's too small in scale. Ras' was trying to take down the whole city in Begins and the Joker had the whole city running for their lives in Knight...
Who or what else could they build up to that level?
Skiptastic said:Uh, really? I figure it would be original, seeing as how it's not based on any one specific work.
Scullibundo said:I've thought about who I would want as the villain for the next movie. And I want none of the other Batmanverse supervillains back because they would ruin it. They need to create their own threat within their own established universe rather than shoehorn some well-known comic villain in.
What I would like to see is a crazied-up Falcone escape from Gotham and declare an organised war on Gotham and more-so - on Batman. Batman would be hunted by all the mob families as well as the GCPD. Eventually Gotham would have to decide what is in their best interests.
Pedobear said:''You are lucky''
.
.
.
''Your driver isn't''
That is all.
Pedobear said:''You are lucky''
.
.
.
''Your driver isn't''
That is all.
Scullibundo said:Wasn't it.
You are lucky.
*flips coin*
*starts buckling seatbelt*
'He's not'
'Who?'
'Your driver'
*BANG*
Scullibundo said:I would've liked to have seen some blood leaking from Batman's suit after he was shot.
DMczaf said:They kept the blood down so they could get the PG-13. Notice that a lot of the violent scenes are psychological, instead of gory.
Hell, look at Joker's Magic Trick :lol
"TA DA! MAGIC!"
Scarecrow said:Does anyone else get the feeling that the ending was redone, due to Heath's death?
I don't. The Joker I thought would always be around as a opponent and reminder to Bruce what he cannot do. Two-Face's death I predicted due to the fact he would serve no purpose in the Nolanverse without creating a massive scheme to destroy which Harvey would have no reason to do. However they did a wonderful job with his character and stressed that he was always Harvey Dent with just a little of Two-Face.Scarecrow said:Does anyone else get the feeling that the ending was redone, due to Heath's death? From what I understand, they were going to save Two Face for the third movie. The ending for DK doesn't exactly lend to that outcome.
I hate to say it, but I'm glad circumstances changed that they didn't go that route. I think the story works better compacted into one movie as opposed to spanning two films.
Fix The Scientist said:I really agree with this, i'm surprised nobody else has mentioned it. The ending felt somewhat altered, or at least oddly put together.
I think they arent sure on where the next one is going so they left a lot of room for movement.
Penguin said:I don't know. The ending made sense.
This was more Harvey's movie then anyone else. And it ended with him. I have to say while I am disappointed to see Harvey go, his bit didn't feel shoehorned in like Venom in Spiderman 3. He wasn't evil per say just looking for revenge on those who wronged him. And dealing out justice his way.
I think it is possible for him to still be alive, I mean Batman survived.
.
hirokazu said:Why do people speak as if Two-Face died at the end? Batman survived the fall. There was no indication whatsoever that Two-Face died. He could've been passed out. Despite them tying up his story, I suspect he may be back in the future.
RubxQub said:I'm still not sure what happened with the Rachel/Dent bomb scene.
Batman said he was going after Rachel, which in turn would have sent Gordan+crew out to Dent.
So the Joker's intent was to have Batman go after Dent and find Rachel (as the Joker has no reason to suspect that Batman and Rachel are romantically linked). But the plan backfires and Batman goes after Rachel, turning out to be Dent.
I thought that Batman intentionally went after Dent, and told Gordan to he was going after Rachel so Gordan's crew would be safely by Dent, instead of blown up by Rachel. I assumed he knowingly sacrificed Rachel for the good of the city.
Not sure what really happened there.
hirokazu said:Why do people speak as if Two-Face died at the end? Batman survived the fall. There was no indication whatsoever that Two-Face died. He could've been passed out. Despite them tying up his story, I suspect he may be back in the future.
RubxQub said:I'm still not sure what happened with the Rachel/Dent bomb scene.
Batman said he was going after Rachel, which in turn would have sent Gordan+crew out to Dent.
So the Joker's intent was to have Batman go after Dent and find Rachel (as the Joker has no reason to suspect that Batman and Rachel are romantically linked). But the plan backfires and Batman goes after Rachel, turning out to be Dent.
I thought that Batman intentionally went after Dent, and told Gordan to he was going after Rachel so Gordan's crew would be safely by Dent, instead of blown up by Rachel. I assumed he knowingly sacrificed Rachel for the good of the city.
Not sure what really happened there.
During that scene though, the previews showed Dent getting doused in the oil and shouting "NOOO!" I always assumed that was because it was some kind of acid burning the side of his face or something. The fact that it was because he was getting saved makes that preview so fuck awesomely decieving.
It's funny that this arguement only holds up when talking about Batman.woodchuck said:it's the fucking batman