The Dark Knight SPOILER THREAD

Status
Not open for further replies.
vatstep said:
There absolutely has to be one more film. The way the arc has gone so far, it really IS quite similar to the original Star Wars trilogy, and I just can't see Nolan ending things on such a bleak note. Whereas BB was triumphant, TDK was the complete opposite; Joker ultimately won. But you have to think that after Ledger's death, Nolan's stance might've changed a bit, and not just because Ledger may have been planned to star in the third film; I can't imagine how such an untimely death like his could effect a director. Though a third film might not even be Nolan's decision... not sure about contracts and whatnot.

Regarding Dent: I was pretty shocked that he died. I was almost certain they'd introduce him late in the film and have him be a "carry-over" to the potential next one. But I think it was a good move, in the end; you can only have a character be so motivated and so evil due to lost love for a short while before it gets corny. But in all, Eckhart's performance was great, and the effects on Two-Face were fucking unreal.

I wouldn't say that the Joker ultimately won. Batman's sacrifice led to Harvey Dent dieing as a martyr and not a murderer (as the Joker wanted).

Joker said that "when the chips are down, these civilized people will eat each other (or something like that)". But neither ferry was willing to blow up the other ferry. It showed that there is still some sanity and good in Gotham's people - the complete opposite of what the Joker wanted.
 
woodchuck said:
I wouldn't say that the Joker ultimately won. Batman's sacrifice led to Harvey Dent dieing as a martyr and not a murderer (as the Joker wanted).

Joker said that "when the chips are down, these civilized people will eat each other (or something like that)". But neither ferry was willing to blow up the other ferry. It showed that there is still some sanity and good in Gotham's people - the complete opposite of what the Joker wanted.
Yeah but for a while it seemed as if he was right, for example when all the civilians were trying to kill that one Wayne Enterprises guy who was going to reveal Batmans identity.


I must admit, I almost wanted to see one of the ferries explode just to see the Joker win. Ledger was just that good. In some way I was rooting for both Joker and Batman.
 
Raguel said:
Let's not go that far. Not yet at least.

I know it's still early, but based on what i've seen so far this year, this is easily the best. At this point, i'd say it has a shot for a nomination.
 
ezekial45 said:
I know it's still early, but based on what i've seen so far this year, this is easily the best. At this point, i'd say it has a shot for a nomination.

the question isn't if it will win best picture (that's a given). the question is if it will beat the record of 11 oscars.

Locks:

best pic
best director
best actor (bale)
best supporting actor (ledger)
best actress (maggie)
best screenplay
best editing
best cinematography
best original score
best make-up
best sound

maybe:

best supporting actress (ballerina)

I think if TDK can manage to get the best supporting actress award early on, it'll have a 100% shot of getting 12 oscars
 
woodchuck said:
the question isn't if it will win best picture (that's a given). the question is if it will beat the record of 11 oscars.

Locks:

best pic
best director
best actor (bale)
best supporting actor (ledger)
best actress (maggie)
best screenplay
best editing
best cinematography
best original score
best make-up
best sound

maybe:

best supporting actress (ballerina)

I think if TDK can manage to get the best supporting actress award early on, it'll have a 100% shot of getting 12 oscars
you are getting far too ahead of yourself. Maggie and Bale have a 0% of being nominated and best picture and best director are a long shot at best still.
 
Cheebs said:
you are getting far too ahead of yourself. Maggie and Bale have a 0% of being nominated and best picture and best director are a long shot at best still.

I think you are totally off base, and I believe with ABSOLUTE CLARITY, that they will rename the Best Actor and Actress awards, to the HEY PAUL and SECRETARY SLAPASS Awards.
 
Lonestar said:
I think you are totally off base, and I believe with ABSOLUTE CLARITY, that they will rename the Best Actor and Actress awards, to the HEY PAUL and SECRETARY SLAPASS Awards.

:lol

I think Best Supporting Actor is a lock, probably Best Cinematography. Best Director and Best Pic should be considerations. And Best Original Screenplay should be on the table. (nominations wise at least, though I cannot imagine a supporting role with as much power and force as Ledger's Joker.)
 
Cheebs said:
you are getting far too ahead of yourself. Maggie and Bale have a 0% of being nominated and best picture and best director are a long shot at best still.


you know what Cheebs. you are absolutely correct.

Ledger will win best actor. Oldman will win best supporting actor.

I think the Ballerina gave a strong enough and long enough performance to warrant a Best Actress nomination.
 
Cheebs said:
you are getting far too ahead of yourself. Maggie and Bale have a 0% of being nominated and best picture and best director are a long shot at best still.
WRONG! The dark knight will win every category including best documentary, best foreign picture, animated film, best short film, and even best song!
 
Face Facts Cheebs, it's going to sweep the Tony's AND The Daytime Emmy's. Socke it down.

Why am I in a spoiler thread when I haven't seen the movie yet....oh shit, can't let that news slipppppppp
 
DMczaf said:
At the time I thought the Joker/Batman musical number in the interrogation room was out of place, but now it all makes sense.
Everything makes sense when you bet on the Joker! It's all part of the plan.
 
Would something like this be up for original screenplay or adapted? Technically it's an original story, but it's based on characters that other people have come up with.
 
suaveric said:
Would something like this be up for original screenplay or adapted? Technically it's an original story, but it's based on characters that other people have come up with.

It would be for adapted.
 
ezekial45 said:
It would be for adapted.

Uh, really? I figure it would be original, seeing as how it's not based on any one specific work.

Oh, and Lonestar, you just really fucked yourself by coming in here. What are you thinking? You're getting spoiled on the best parts!
 
suaveric said:
That could be a good way to go with the Riddler. But the problem is that even with that take, it's too small in scale. Ras' was trying to take down the whole city in Begins and the Joker had the whole city running for their lives in Knight...

Who or what else could they build up to that level?

Riddler as the person leading the hunt for Batman helping deduce that he is Bruce Wayne to get rid of Batman and claim gotham as his crime empire?
 
Skiptastic said:
Uh, really? I figure it would be original, seeing as how it's not based on any one specific work.

On second thought, you may be right. I remembered that they used The Long Halloween as a source for the screenplay. However it wasn't an exact adaption.
 
Saw it tonight.
Awesome movie.

Some of my favorite scenes.
The magic trick with the pencil.
The Joker in a nurse outfit.
The Joker's one phone call.
Still like the Prologue.

The interrogation scene between Joker and Batman was one of my most anticipated scene and lived up to it.

And I liked how the climax was so tense and suspenseful. It was really different with the hostage situations.
 
I've thought about who I would want as the villain for the next movie. And I want none of the other Batmanverse supervillains back because they would ruin it. They need to create their own threat within their own established universe rather than shoehorn some well-known comic villain in.

What I would like to see is a crazied-up Falcone escape from Gotham and declare an organised war on Gotham and more-so - on Batman. Batman would be hunted by all the mob families as well as the GCPD. Eventually Gotham would have to decide what is in their best interests.
 
Scullibundo said:
I've thought about who I would want as the villain for the next movie. And I want none of the other Batmanverse supervillains back because they would ruin it. They need to create their own threat within their own established universe rather than shoehorn some well-known comic villain in.

What I would like to see is a crazied-up Falcone escape from Gotham and declare an organised war on Gotham and more-so - on Batman. Batman would be hunted by all the mob families as well as the GCPD. Eventually Gotham would have to decide what is in their best interests.

Mob hires Riddler to find out who Batman is pitting the worlds two greatest detectives against one another? Actually the mob hires the Riddler to do just this in either Dark Victory or Long Halloween. This could work. Batman has to continually try to throw the riddler off his trail.
 
I am curious how the GCPD thing would work.

Obviously, they would be chasing Batman, but Gordon knows he is innocent. Would they need to bring him in or something?

And I loved the Bat-sonar. Even if it almost made poor Lucius quit.
 
I saw the movie yesterday. It was beautiful :D

An amazing film with a lot of really cool moments. I definitely need to go see it again at the cinemas.

Can I hear a big 'Holy Fuck!' at the scene where Batman busts in the door thinking he's saving rachael but instead Harvey is there. Harvey despairs and yells out "Why are you coming for me!". Rachael's reaction over the intercom when she realises she isn't going to be saved in time was very moving.
 
Aaron Eckhart deserves a nomination.

When he asks Gordon to tell him what they used to call him down at the SIU and Gordon tries to tip-toe around the question, only for Harvey to then burst out screaming 'TELL MEE!!!!!!!!!!' - that was when the tragedy of Dent really hit home. Fuck Eckhart was amazing.

I would've liked to have seen some blood leaking from Batman's suit after he was shot.
 
Scullibundo said:
I would've liked to have seen some blood leaking from Batman's suit after he was shot.

They kept the blood down so they could get the PG-13. Notice that a lot of the violent scenes are psychological, instead of gory.

Hell, look at Joker's Magic Trick :lol

"TA DA! MAGIC!"
 
DMczaf said:
They kept the blood down so they could get the PG-13. Notice that a lot of the violent scenes are psychological, instead of gory.

Hell, look at Joker's Magic Trick :lol

"TA DA! MAGIC!"

I know I know. But even Die Hard 4 had blood smears. I guess I needed recognition that Batman was moving like he was moving because he was shot - not because he fell.
 
Does anyone else get the feeling that the ending was redone, due to Heath's death? From what I understand, they were going to save Two Face for the third movie. The ending for DK doesn't exactly lend to that outcome.

I hate to say it, but I'm glad circumstances changed that they didn't go that route. I think the story works better compacted into one movie as opposed to spanning two films.
 
I knew there would be a thread on this. Dead, woodchuck, we were within 20 feet of each other :O

Fucking amazing movie.

081208
 
Scarecrow said:
Does anyone else get the feeling that the ending was redone, due to Heath's death?

I really agree with this, i'm surprised nobody else has mentioned it. The ending felt somewhat altered, or at least oddly put together.

I think they arent sure on where the next one is going so they left a lot of room for movement.
 
Scarecrow said:
Does anyone else get the feeling that the ending was redone, due to Heath's death? From what I understand, they were going to save Two Face for the third movie. The ending for DK doesn't exactly lend to that outcome.

I hate to say it, but I'm glad circumstances changed that they didn't go that route. I think the story works better compacted into one movie as opposed to spanning two films.
I don't. The Joker I thought would always be around as a opponent and reminder to Bruce what he cannot do. Two-Face's death I predicted due to the fact he would serve no purpose in the Nolanverse without creating a massive scheme to destroy which Harvey would have no reason to do. However they did a wonderful job with his character and stressed that he was always Harvey Dent with just a little of Two-Face.
 
Fix The Scientist said:
I really agree with this, i'm surprised nobody else has mentioned it. The ending felt somewhat altered, or at least oddly put together.

I think they arent sure on where the next one is going so they left a lot of room for movement.


Way back when Goyer and Nolan were working on Begins, they also sketched out the possible trilogy, which originally did have Two-Face in the third movie. But that changed when they finally sat down to do the script for TDK.

Nolan did no re-shoots for this movie. Everything was finished before Heath died.
 
I don't know. The ending made sense.

This was more Harvey's movie then anyone else. And it ended with him. I have to say while I am disappointed to see Harvey go, his bit didn't feel shoehorned in like Venom in Spiderman 3. He wasn't evil per say just looking for revenge on those who wronged him. And dealing out justice his way.

I think it is possible for him to still be alive, I mean Batman survived.

Also reminded me of some awesome parts.
-Batman breaking Sal's legs was gruesome.
"From this height you won't kill me.
I'm hoping on it"
*Drops him*

-His departure from Hong Kong was awesome.

-The scene of the Joker's death.

-The final scene with Joker swinging upside down.

-I enjoyed the whole climax in the building with SWAT and the clowns.
 
Penguin said:
I don't know. The ending made sense.

This was more Harvey's movie then anyone else. And it ended with him. I have to say while I am disappointed to see Harvey go, his bit didn't feel shoehorned in like Venom in Spiderman 3. He wasn't evil per say just looking for revenge on those who wronged him. And dealing out justice his way.

I think it is possible for him to still be alive, I mean Batman survived.
.

but it's the fucking batman and he has the batsuit.


they did show gordon speaking at dent's funeral. it's possible that dent's still alive and that they faked the funeral so no one would think dent is what he is, but i doubt that.

i actually hope Dent is dead, since I really like the ending.



- oh and we need a "banned" gif out of the joker's pencil trick
 
Why do people speak as if Two-Face died at the end? Batman survived the fall. There was no indication whatsoever that Two-Face died. He could've been passed out. Despite them tying up his story, I suspect he may be back in the future.
 
I'm still not sure what happened with the Rachel/Dent bomb scene.

Batman said he was going after Rachel, which in turn would have sent Gordan+crew out to Dent.

So the Joker's intent was to have Batman go after Dent and find Rachel (as the Joker has no reason to suspect that Batman and Rachel are romantically linked). But the plan backfires and Batman goes after Rachel, turning out to be Dent.

I thought that Batman intentionally went after Dent, and told Gordan to he was going after Rachel so Gordan's crew would be safely by Dent, instead of blown up by Rachel. I assumed he knowingly sacrificed Rachel for the good of the city.

Not sure what really happened there.

During that scene though, the previews showed Dent getting doused in the oil and shouting "NOOO!" I always assumed that was because it was some kind of acid burning the side of his face or something. The fact that it was because he was getting saved makes that preview so fuck awesomely decieving.

hirokazu said:
Why do people speak as if Two-Face died at the end? Batman survived the fall. There was no indication whatsoever that Two-Face died. He could've been passed out. Despite them tying up his story, I suspect he may be back in the future.

Agreed. I'm not so sure that Dent is dead.
 
RubxQub said:
I'm still not sure what happened with the Rachel/Dent bomb scene.

Batman said he was going after Rachel, which in turn would have sent Gordan+crew out to Dent.

So the Joker's intent was to have Batman go after Dent and find Rachel (as the Joker has no reason to suspect that Batman and Rachel are romantically linked). But the plan backfires and Batman goes after Rachel, turning out to be Dent.

I thought that Batman intentionally went after Dent, and told Gordan to he was going after Rachel so Gordan's crew would be safely by Dent, instead of blown up by Rachel. I assumed he knowingly sacrificed Rachel for the good of the city.

Not sure what really happened there.

didnt joker say he thought there was something between Rachel & Batman after the way Batman dived after her when he threw her off the building during the party

Batman went thinking he was going to save Rachel but instead saved Dent
 
hirokazu said:
Why do people speak as if Two-Face died at the end? Batman survived the fall. There was no indication whatsoever that Two-Face died. He could've been passed out. Despite them tying up his story, I suspect he may be back in the future.

I'm not saying Dent is dead (though I didn't see him breathing), but Batman survived the fall because of his armour. Earlier in the film he surived the long drop from his penthouse.
 
RubxQub said:
I'm still not sure what happened with the Rachel/Dent bomb scene.

Batman said he was going after Rachel, which in turn would have sent Gordan+crew out to Dent.

So the Joker's intent was to have Batman go after Dent and find Rachel (as the Joker has no reason to suspect that Batman and Rachel are romantically linked). But the plan backfires and Batman goes after Rachel, turning out to be Dent.

I thought that Batman intentionally went after Dent, and told Gordan to he was going after Rachel so Gordan's crew would be safely by Dent, instead of blown up by Rachel. I assumed he knowingly sacrificed Rachel for the good of the city.

Not sure what really happened there.

During that scene though, the previews showed Dent getting doused in the oil and shouting "NOOO!" I always assumed that was because it was some kind of acid burning the side of his face or something. The fact that it was because he was getting saved makes that preview so fuck awesomely decieving.

I think Joker said that he figured out Batman truly cares for Rachel. So he tricked him knowing that killing Rachel or not saving her would drive him more crazy.

As Batman said in the final scene, nothing is simple with the Joker. He was gonna have the cops take out hostages from a hospital.
 
woodchuck said:
it's the fucking batman
It's funny that this arguement only holds up when talking about Batman.

He's just that good. :lol

As to the Rachel/Dent thing, you guys are right. I remember the Joker saying that he saw some spark between the Bat and Rachel, so I assume he used her to make the decision that much more complicated.

Still, choosing to save Rachel over Dent doesn't seem like the right choice. Perhaps emotions got the best of him (considering he fucking locked everyone out of the room and starting opening gallon jugs of whoop ass all over the Joker's face in the interrogation room the moment Rachel entered the picture.)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom