gutter_trash
Banned
It's from a previous White House protest:
![]()
Also, if Hillary loses the general, what should her supporters evaluate about themselves?
they are harmless, and baked
I doubt that Pro-weed people are goign to vote for Trump
It's from a previous White House protest:
![]()
Also, if Hillary loses the general, what should her supporters evaluate about themselves?
Trump has basically the same position as HillaryI doubt that Pro-weed people are goign to vote for Trump
That may have been his intention when he started but the dude's head got bigger than Barry Bonds' roided-up melon.
Why in the world would Michelle get boo'd?
This is an election fueled by a rift between a fed up electorate and the status quo. Seeing someone use religion as a weapon, outright, cards on the table, that's a slap in the face for those who expected integrity out of the political process. Already the Sanders camp had felt steamrolled, felt the process working against them. Those emails are confirmation. Whether or not he would have lost anyway is not part of the question. Seeing the political process working against him, especially with the way he embodied change, should be enough to get people riled up. They aren't the ones at fault here.but the emails are extremely tame. if you get past the headlines, there isnt a lot of stuff here so far
Trump has the same position as Hillary
It's from a previous White House protest:
![]()
Also, if Hillary loses the general, what should her supporters evaluate about themselves?
Why in the world would Michelle get boo'd?
they are harmless, and baked
I doubt that Pro-weed people are goign to vote for Trump
It's from a previous White House protest:
Also, if Hillary loses the general, what should her supporters evaluate about themselves?
Maybe Johnson? Johnson and Sanders agree on 74% of the issues, and Johnson being "free" and no regulation, probably wins some of the legalize weed.
Prop with Johnson is that he is totally limited government. He is not specially against private prisons, citing that what makes those bad can happen in public prisons as well. I dont know if Bernie supporters will take.
Which was, and is, meaningless, since Sanders was never subjected to a Republican attack campaign. The GOP wanted to face Sanders; they made that clear.They'll blame everyone but themselves for supporting a paper tiger candidate when Sanders polled much better head to head, consistently.
Jill Stein is pro-legalization.Maybe Johnson? Johnson and Sanders agree on 74% of the issues, and Johnson being "free" and no regulation, probably wins some of the legalize weed.
Prop with Johnson is that he is totally limited government. He is not specially against private prisons, citing that what makes those bad can happen in public prisons as well. I dont know if Bernie supporters will take.
Which was, and is, meaningless, since Sanders was never subjected to a Republican attack campaign. The GOP wanted to face Sanders; they made that clear.
Sanders wouldn't have stood a chance against the GOP. The fact that Hillary won the majority of vote's for the nomination prove that Hillary was the most popular candidate.They'll blame everyone but themselves for supporting a paper tiger candidate when Sanders polled much better head to head, consistently.
Is there a way to watch this, and when does it start UK time?
Wasn't WhatsApp used by the Turkey coup plotters?what are other forms of communication that are unhackable?
officials have to start using whatsapp and face to face convos from now on.
nothing's safe
Which was, and is, meaningless, since Sanders was never subjected to a Republican attack campaign. The GOP wanted to face Sanders; they made that clear.
I'm pretty sure I'm gonna have to stay away from politics talk between now and the election. The bending over backwards people are constantly doing to defend a politician of immense privilege is getting pretty grating. If Democrats insist on coddling an objectively weak candidate, they'll get exactly what they ordered come November. Hopefully they manage to pull it out instead of scoring the worst political own-goal of all time by fumbling the election away to a clown.
That's the winning Democrat strategy I know and love. "Vote for me unless you're racist/homophobic/an idiot."
anyone?
Sanders wouldn't have stood a chance against the GOP. The fact that Hillary won the majority of vote's for the nomination prove that Hillary was the most popular candidate.
In an interview with the Sun-Sentinel she said: "I have decided that in the interest of making sure that we can start the Democratic convention on a high note that I am not going to gavel in the convention."
The anger over leaked emails showing DNC officials plotting against the primary campaign of Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders boiled over Monday as Wasserman Schultz was greeted by boos and jeers at her home state's breakfast meeting. Later, Bernie Sanders spoke to a raucous crowd of delegates supporting his candidacy which reacted with boos when he urged them to support Clinton's election this fall.
Thank the fucking Gods.
It won't defuse all tension, but it'll help mitigate it. She already kept the news cycle fed by not bowing out entirely before now.In an interview with the Sun-Sentinel she said: "I have decided that in the interest of making sure that we can start the Democratic convention on a high note that I am not going to gavel in the convention."
Because they viewed Sanders as the weaker candidate. He's got a treasure trove of past associations with far left organizations that would be a goldmine for GOP attacks. The Republicans have always tried to portray the Democrats as closet communists; Sanders actually does have a lot of past associations with that movement, and openly calls himself a socialist.Is that because they feared a Clinton presidency more than a Sanders one, or because they thought that Sanders was the weaker candidate?
Agree with everything you posted, Red.This is an election fueled by a rift between a fed up electorate and the status quo. Seeing someone use religion as a weapon, outright, cards on the table, that's a slap in the face for those who expected integrity out of the political process. Already the Sanders camp had felt steamrolled, felt the process working against them. Those emails are confirmation. Whether or not he would have lost anyway is not part of the question. Seeing the political process working against him, especially with the way he embodied change, should be enough to get people riled up. They aren't the ones at fault here.
All this makes me wish Obama could serve another term.
Is that because they feared a Clinton presidency more than a Sanders one, or because they thought that Sanders was the weaker candidate?
Both, they fear that Clinton will be able to get things done with a liberal dominated Supreme Court and with her years of experience and many connections she has alot more sway than someone like Sanders. With Sanders they could easily attack him and make a strong case for Trump as president due to Sanders more socialist views. His argument of breaking up the big banks for example is always repeated, but realistically it's easier said than done.Is that because they feared a Clinton presidency more than a Sanders one, or because they thought that Sanders was the weaker candidate?
It won't defuse all tension, but it'll help mitigate it. She already kept the news cycle fed by not bowing out entirely before now.
When Bernie Sanders lost the primaries, did his supporters ever stop to evaluate something about themselves?Also, if Hillary loses the general, what should her supporters evaluate about themselves?
Getting booed at breakfast woke her up
Why in the world would Michelle get boo'd?
Which was, and is, meaningless, since Sanders was never subjected to a Republican attack campaign. The GOP wanted to face Sanders; they made that clear.
This is an election fueled by a rift between a fed up electorate and the status quo. Seeing someone use religion as a weapon, outright, cards on the table, that's a slap in the face for those who expected integrity out of the political process. Already the Sanders camp had felt steamrolled, felt the process working against them. Those emails are confirmation. Whether or not he would have lost anyway is not part of the question. Seeing the political process working against him, especially with the way he embodied change, should be enough to get people riled up. They aren't the ones at fault here.
All this makes me wish Obama could serve another term.
You make it sound like Sanders weaknesses weren't gone over pretty well in the Dem contest, they were. We've had leaks confirming as much.
Is that because they feared a Clinton presidency more than a Sanders one, or because they thought that Sanders was the weaker candidate?
When Bernie Sanders lost the primaries, did his supporters ever stop to evaluate something about themselves?
Ask that question of yourself first before you blame others.
You make it sound like Sanders weaknesses weren't gone over pretty well in the Dem contest, they were. We've had leaks confirming as much.
When Bernie Sanders lost the primaries, did his supporters ever stop to evaluate something about themselves?
Ask that question of yourself first before you blame others.
You make it sound like Sanders weaknesses weren't gone over pretty well in the Dem contest, they were. We've had leaks confirming as much.
If Bernie had won, Trump would 24/7 be yelling about how he wants to turn the US into Venezuela, and calling him "Bernie Chavez"
why are they so easily succumb to the fear mongering when they are supposed to be "tough"?
"Without truth, science and all human knowledge collapse into conjecture. Without truth, the vital profession of journalism and how we follow the events of our day and understand the signs of our times dissolve into rumor. Without truth, the worlds of politics and business melt down into rules and power games. Without truth, the precious gift of human reason and freedom becomes license and all human relationships lose the bonding element of trust that is binding at their heart... Both hypocrisy and evil depend on lies. Hypocrisy is a lie in deeds rather than in words. And evil always uses lies to cover its oppressions. Only with truth can we stand up to deception and manipulation. For all who hate hypocrisy, care for justice and human dignity, and are prepared to fight evil, truth is the absolute requirement." (Os Guinness, Guest Scholar at the Woodrow Wilson Center and a Visiting Fellow at the Brookings Institution)
"In his seminal work Self-Deception, philosopher Herbert Fingarette argues that such willful ignorance lies at “the deep paradox of self-deception.” The self-deceived person “persuades himself to believe contrary to the evidence in order to evade, somehow, the unpleasant truth to which he has already seen that the evidence points.”. As Bahnsen writes, “There is something of a cognitive mess at the core of our lives. We are inconsistent in our choices, incoherent in our convictions, persuaded where we ought not to be, and deluded that we know ourselves transparently.” We often swing between belief and unbelief because deep down, like C.S. Lewis, we don’t want to be “interfered with.” We want freedom and truth on our own terms, because we recognize, as one author remarks, “The truth makes us free but first it makes us miserable.” (Danielle DuRant)
No, they weren't.You make it sound like Sanders weaknesses weren't gone over pretty well in the Dem contest, they were.