Not sure if seriousOf course. I have seen nearly every movie.
Did you actually see A Scanner Darkly? If so, what did you think of it and the animation? Just curious!
Not sure if seriousOf course. I have seen nearly every movie.
No, you're checking out the manga. They succeeded.
The album with the ED song is on spotify and iTunes if anyone cares.
I feel like I've been played!
whats it called? searching Aku No Hana doesn't help
edit: found it. Asa-Chang & Junray - Hana
whats it called? searching Aku No Hana doesn't help
edit: found it. Asa-Chang & Junray - Hana
I don't get why folks would make an anime with such ugly character designs...
.In short (note that this is a quick & dirty summary):
- At first Nagahama (the director) refused the offer to direct the adaptation, because he thought that simply turning this manga into a pretty, clean-looking anime would be pointless. He says that he believes that when the mangaka draws this story he's seeing something "else" which he expresses as a manga. So there would be no point in simply presenting it in animated form, at that rate you might as well just read the manga and be done with it.
- He thought if it was to be adapted at all, it should be done as a live drama. When he was offered the job the second time, he pitched the idea of using rotoscope. He was aware that the result would be different from the manga.
- Oshimi (the mangaka) says Nagahama is right about the way he creates the manga: the original story is something that exists in his head, and he draws what he sees in his mind. So basically the anime and the manga are two different versions of the story that exists in Oshimi's head. By the way, he was also aware that due to the rotoscope the anime would look different from his work, and he thought it was an interesting idea.
- Oshimi also says that he thinks Nagahama has a very deep insight into the story, and firmly believes that he's taking it in the right direction. He also very much approves of Nagahama's wish of the anime leaving the viewers with a scar.
- Oshimi was pretty much "in" on the whole thing, they tested the rotoscope method on him.
- The interviewer asks about the impact the visuals would have on viewers, and Nagahama says he's well aware that a lot of people will go "what the fuck" and "this is gross," "I hate this, I'm not watching this." But he's pretty much okay with that, too, because he thinks it's fine as long as it leaves an impact on people. Viewers may dismiss it right away, but some may check it out later and find it interesting, or they may come across the manga, recognize the title, and read that.
- Oshimi says that he once got a fan letter from a high school girl who wrote that when she read the manga in middle school she thought it was stupid, but she tried to read it again when she was older and she found it very good. Nagahama says that this is what he's going for, to leave an impact, even if it's negative. He's trying to create something that one can't just ignore or dismiss.
- Oshimi also says that the anime has many scenes that he wishes he would've drawn the way they are in the anime, for example a scene with Kasuga and Nakamura in the classroom.
- Also, he confesses he's writing the manga with the intention of murdering the readers with it (metaphorically, of course), thinks the anime is doing the same, and relishes the idea of the viewers getting slaughtered, jokingly of course. (lol #1)
They leave the following messages to the fans:
- Oshimi: He guarantees that those who feel very strongly about Aku no hana will enjoy the anime. However, chara-moe types, those who go "Nakamura-san, unf unf" will probably feel betrayed. (lol #2)
- Nagahama: Since it's so different from the usual anime, he can't say that everyone will love it. But those who watch the first episode and think "I want to see more" will not have their expectations betrayed.
Why all the terrible reviews? This seemed creative and interesting and really good!
It's what Japanese people really look like...I don't get why folks would make an anime with such ugly character designs...
All that said, for all the shit that image of Nakamura has been getting to the point of becoming meme-worthy, I actually really liked how she looks in this frame. Probably even more than her manga design.
It's what Japanese people really look like...
Pretty sure Japanese people aren't flat-shaded with outlines, nor do they move at 8 frames per second and occasionally freeze in place. And their facial features don't randomly disappear, either.
Yous a funny guy. Except that he said character design not animation. The features fading in is pretty bad.Pretty sure Japanese people aren't flat-shaded with outlines, nor do they move at 8 frames per second and occasionally freeze in place. And their facial features don't randomly disappear, either.
I watched it. I really don't understand why everyone is so goddamn mad.
I don't really watch anime outside of a few series about 5 years ago. The thread title piqued my interest, saw all the bad reviews and had to have a look at this terrible pos.
Thought it was really fucking good! The soundtrack was amazing (outside of the horrible opening theme, thankfully the ending was double awesome), the 'shots', pacing and feel reminded me of a low budget indie film. Why all the terrible reviews? This seemed creative and interesting and really good!
Looks like I should watch this for the background art but the characters look absolutely hideous.
They kinda resemble real Japanese people.
Oh, the horror!
Episode 1 is up on CR.
1
Only issue with the visuals is the characters dont blush and stuff which was odd. The effect of the scenes to make them a bit more special and memorable was lost as all the character did was get flustered and nothing else, that is when Saeki and Kasuga had the moment where they both looked at one another with the grades and then he turned, I guess in most anime a characters face would turn red and what not.