• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

The Formula 1 2011 Season of Vettel Fingering the Competition |OT|

Status
Not open for further replies.
Edmond Dantès said:
I'd drop many more circuits than just Bahrain.

My calender would be;

Melbourne
Kuala Lumpur
Jerez
Monaco
Magny-Cours
Portimao
Silverstone
Red Bull Ring (A1 Ring)
Hockenheim
Montreal
Texas*
Spa
Monza
Suzuka
Potrero de los Funes (Argentina)
Interlagos

* Depends on the circuit

My dream calender would add;

Le Mans and the Nordschleife alternating as the European GP.

This track list would leave Bernie bankrupt. (To his standards) :p
 

Omiee

Member
Edmond Dantès said:
Imola 2005 had one of the most tense endings of the past decade, as well as an example of ITV's total and utter incompetence.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oK2uV9ApLts&feature=related


i miss those days, for me magnes cours, Argentina and imola signify that 90's 00's feeling, to me those are the golden years in F1. Since im 22 i missed the 70's and 80's, so i didnt get to see senna etc. Man do i miss those intense grand prix's. There was so much pressure on the drivers to than now.
 

Edmond Dantès

Dantès the White
Sleeplessnights said:
This track list would leave Bernie bankrupt. (To his standards) :p
He'll be gone eventually, as morbid as that sounds.

That will be a landmark event in the history of F1. I just wonder who will replace him and what path F1 will take from that point on.
 
Edmond Dantès said:
He'll be gone eventually, as morbid as that sounds.

That will be a landmark event in the history of F1. I just wonder who will replace him and what path F1 will take from that point on.

It's either his clone or someone from F1 Gaf. There's no middle ground here.
 

Ark

Member
Edmond Dantès said:
I'd drop many more circuits than just Bahrain.

My calender would be;

Melbourne
Kuala Lumpur
Jerez
Monaco
Magny-Cours
Portimao
Silverstone
Red Bull Ring (A1 Ring)
Hockenheim
Montreal
Texas*
Spa
Monza
Suzuka
Potrero de los Funes (Argentina)
Interlagos

* Depends on the circuit

My dream calender would add;

Le Mans and the Nordschleife alternating as the European GP.

It's funny, whilst I'd love to see all these old, traditional tracks back on the F1 calendar, I think I'd actually rather see all these new tracks appearing.

Edmond Dantès said:
I nominate Ark.

I'm honoured, but in what sense? ;)
 
Sleeplessnights said:
Naw, that's what people said about Valencia. Valencia is a really great track to drive in, just not a spectators track. Bahrain is neither.
Bahrain is great to drive!

... in F1 2010

I'm reserving judgement on the spectacle of it until we see it with DRS/KERS next year.
 

Shaneus

Member
Ark said:
It's funny, whilst I'd love to see all these old, traditional tracks back on the F1 calendar, I think I'd actually rather see all these new tracks appearing.
Why not have both? With that many tracks, F1 could be a weekly thing with maybe a two week break at the end of the season for development. Maybe three.

I could handle watching 50 races a year!
 

Ark

Member
Sleeplessnights said:
Brilliant XD

I must admit, timing wasn't great :p

What I mean is that F1 needs to maintain the balance of the old, traditional tracks with new tracks in new territories. F1 just keeps on growing massively over the last few years, new tracks in Russia, the US, proposals in Croatia, Mexico, South Africa, New York...The list goes on.

My 'current' calendar would probably be this:

Melbourne
China
Monaco
Montreal
Paul Ricard/Magny Cours
Red Bull Ring
Silverstone
Nurburgring GP Circuit
Texas (As Edmond said, depends on how the races go)
Singapore (I think Singapore is just as important as Monaco now)
Spa
Monza
Suzuka
Sao Paulo

There's room for a few more, but that would be it for me at least.

Shaneus said:
Why not have both? With that many tracks, F1 could be a weekly thing with maybe a two week break at the end of the season for development. Maybe three.

I could handle watching 50 races a year!

That would be logistical suicide :p
 

Ark

Member
mblitek said:
Schumacher's presents:
Ferrari's Present

That's actually really amazing. The statistics on that engine cover alone are testament to Ferrari's dominance in the early century.

Does anyone know where Stephano was within Ferrari during those infamous five years? I remember hearing that it was him who walked with Schumi when he went to go ape shit on DC in '98, but I'm still curious.
 
Ark said:
That's actually really amazing. The statistics on that engine cover alone are testament to Ferrari's dominance in the early century.

Does anyone know where Stephano was within Ferrari during those infamous five years? I remember hearing that it was him who walked with Schumi when he went to go ape shit on DC in '98, but I'm still curious.

Wiki:

In 1995, he was appointed head of personnel in Ferrari's sporting department and was also involved with sponsorship liaison, before being promoted to Team Manager in December 1996.
 

Shaneus

Member
Ark said:
That would be logistical suicide :p
Don't care. I want more Mark!

Anyway, I'd love to see a massive retooling of the race calendar. I'm not as familiar with the tracks as most of you are but I definitely prefer seeing races at the more historical/"natural" tracks than the ones that are designed specifically as tracks (although there are obvious exceptions).

Just as long as we don't lose Melbourne in a hurry... though by the looks of things, that looks more likely to be decided by local government rather than the FIA.
 
From James Allen's blog,

James Allen said:
Vettel has now extended his lead in the championship in the last two Grands Prix to the point where he can clinch his second world title as early as the Singapore Grand Prix, five races before the end of the season, if he wins in both Monza and Singapore. At just 24 years, he would be the youngest ever double champion.

The reason is that with 259 points in the bag already – more than he scored in all of the 2010 season – he needs only to outscore team mate Mark Webber in the next two races by 33 points, Fernando Alonso by 24 points, Jenson Button by 15 points and Lewis Hamilton by 13 points.

Vettel is 92 points clear of Webber, 102 points ahead of Alonso, 110 ahead of Button and 112 ahead of Hamilton. With five races to go Webber would have to be less than 125 points off his team mate to have even a mathematical chance of winning. So far Vettel has won seven times with this 2011 car and Webber has yet to get his first win.

In all probability the championship “fight”, such as it is, will go on a little longer than that, more likely Korea or possibly India. Given that Red Bull has the amazing record of bringing both cars home in the top five at every race, reliability has clearly been outstanding this year. You could argue that they are due a retirement or two.

Vettel is already the youngest ever double world champion to me. But still, since the next races are Monza and Singapore, where Ferrari is hoping to win at home race and Alonso has been traditionally strong at Singapore, I really hope Alonso could win both races so that this season doesn't wrap up that quick when there would be just 5 races left.

Maybe I need to perform some bloody ritual to get this materialized.
 

Shaneus

Member
DrM said:
Webber will have to do something about his starts.
A million times this. Assuming RBR would support their statement about backing the driver with the best chance to win, Webber would actually have a shot by being ahead of his teammate after the first few corners/lap therefore winning a race or two.

He really, really needs to get that shit sorted. Heartbreaking to see it happen so fucking regularly.
 

Juicy Bob

Member
Unless Mark and Seb prefer different 'bite' points, I can't really work out why they'd both have such different performances off the line this year. I thought all you needed to do was to hold the revs at whatever point is most effective, drop the first clutch as soon as the lights go out and then gradually release the 2nd clutch. Mark's issue always seems to be in the initial launch phase, so I can't put it down to anything other than the driver without knowing any more about the technicalities of the Red Bull.

Also, it's amazing to me that it'll seemingly take such an effort for Seb to wrap up the title by Singapore. He'll have it by Japan though. That's almost guaranteed.
 

Shaneus

Member
Juicy Bob said:
Also, it's amazing to me that it'll seemingly take such an effort for Seb to wrap up the title by Singapore. He'll have it by Japan though. That's almost guaranteed.
Pray for DNF. Or maybe pray for SuperKK to take him out. Either way.
 

jey_16

Banned
Edmond Dantès said:
Imola 2005 had one of the most tense endings of the past decade, as well as an example of ITV's total and utter incompetence.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oK2uV9ApLts&feature=related
It's kind of sad that we don't get these battles any more.....at most tracks it's too easy to overtake with DRS and there are a few where it's still way to difficult (I.e catalunya)

There has to be a better balance....I'm just not sure what that is
 

Edmond Dantès

Dantès the White
itsgreen said:
Why Magny Cours? I kind of think the track is soul-less...
I guess it's a lesser of two evils. There are only two circuits in France realistically capable of hosting a Formula One race; Paul Ricard and Magny-Cours. Le Mans wouldn't really be viable, the Bugatti circuit is too short, Dijon-Prenois is pretty much a relic of the past. The other tracks in France are lacking Grade 1 status.

Speaking of which; France had some glorious tracks in the past.

Autodrome de Linas-Montlhéry

NtKSN.png




Charade Circuit

pTcSA.png




Rouen-Les-Essarts

iqsm4.png




Dijon-Prenois

MILsw.png
 

Shaneus

Member
That second last track looks like it would be amazing going by the layout.

Edit: Googled it, the wiki link was purple. I've looked at that before!
 

Juicy Bob

Member
Shaneus said:
That second last track looks like it would be amazing going by the layout.
Loved Rouen on GTL. Really challenging, high-speed circuit. Virtually always ended up going off at the fast left hand turn at the beginning of the track and ending up in the trees.
 
Juicy Bob said:
Loved Rouen on GTL. Really challenging, high-speed circuit. Virtually always ended up going off at the fast left hand turn at the beginning of the track and ending up in the trees.
Indeed, I died at Rouen more than any other circuit. One of my favourite, so dangerous. GPL is coming up to its 13th birthday by the way, can't believe how old (and awesome) it is.
Edmond Dantès said:
I love how the vid-editor has a single 'car accelerating' sound file and simply loops it every 30 seconds. Should've sampled a GPL lap instead!
 

Omiee

Member
Ark said:
Spa looked like a McLaren and Mercedes circuit before Sunday..


I dont know though, i think they (mercedes) did pretty well. Its the little things they have to improve on. They had immense speed, they need to improve their aerodynamic package, and i could see them winning races next year.


Question: Who was more important to red bull coulthard or vettel? Vettel brought them race wins and a championship, but coulthard was at the beginning and all the improvements.
 

Edmond Dantès

Dantès the White
Omiee said:
I dont know though, i think they (mercedes) did pretty well. Its the little things they have to improve on. They had immense speed, they need to improve their aerodynamic package, and i could see them winning races next year.


Question: Who was more important to red bull coulthard or vettel? Vettel brought them race wins and a championship, but coulthard was at the beginning and all the improvements.
Adrian Newey and his design team. Without them Red Bull would be just be another run of the mill team and Vettel and co wouldn't be in the situation they find themselves in.
 

Ark

Member
Edmond Dantès said:
Adrian Newey and his design team. Without them Red Bull would be just be another run of the mill team and Vettel and co wouldn't be in the situation they find themselves in.

This.

Webber pretty much just stuck through after the Jaguar days and Coulthard just needed a drive.
 

Omiee

Member
Ark said:
This.

Webber pretty much just stuck through after the Jaguar days and Coulthard just needed a drive.


He did help them develop and grow, they needed his experience. And off course newey is the most important guy in that team, and one of the biggest reasons they are as good as they are now.
 

Ark

Member
Omiee said:
He did help them develop and grow, they needed his experience. And off course newey is the most important guy in that team, and one of the biggest reasons they are as good as they are now.

Of course Coulthard would have brought his McLaren experience into the team, but he only has a small part to play in RBR's success.

Don't forget that Red Bull spent SO much time restructuring the company after they bought Jaguar, if I remember rightly, a lot of RBR used to be part of Jaguar so they would have needed the time to settle in to a new atmosphere.

Also remembering that in the early days after buying Jaguar, McLaren and Ferrari had pretty much worked out and added everything to the cars that the current technical regs would let them, with Sauber and Honda just behind them.

Pretty much all of RBR's success has come from McLaren and Ferrari royally screwing up the new tech regs in 2009.

It'll be very interesting to see what happens with RBR after 2014.
 

Omiee

Member
Ark said:
Of course Coulthard would have brought his McLaren experience into the team, but he only has a small part to play in RBR's success.

Don't forget that Red Bull spent SO much time restructuring the company after they bought Jaguar, if I remember rightly, a lot of RBR used to be part of Jaguar so they would have needed the time to settle in to a new atmosphere.

Also remembering that in the early days after buying Jaguar, McLaren and Ferrari had pretty much worked out and added everything to the cars that the current technical regs would let them, with Sauber and Honda just behind them.

Pretty much all of RBR's success has come from McLaren and Ferrari royally screwing up the new tech regs in 2009.

It'll be very interesting to see what happens with RBR after 2014.


Hell no, thats not fair to red bull. Your taking away from their brilliant strategy the last few years. Saying pretty much the only reason RBR is succesfull is because of mclaren and ferrari's screwups is unfair.
Its a lot of things that make that team good. Its newey, its horner's strategy. Its webber and coulthard experience. Its vettel who is a young shumi in the making. I have confidence they can still be a championship contender after the new engine's and regulations.
Also i like the team more than ferrari and mclaren, ferrari and mclaren in a lesser way are so uptight.
 
Ark said:
It'll be very interesting to see what happens with RBR after 2014.

Whatever happens in 2014, Red Bull have already established themselves as one of the big teams.

I think next year is going to be interesting; Mercedes, Renault and Williams (?) All hoping to make a winning car.
 

Ark

Member
Omiee said:
Hell no, thats not fair to red bull. Your taking away from their brilliant strategy the last few years. Saying pretty much the only reason RBR is succesfull is because of mclaren and ferrari's screwups is unfair.
Its a lot of things that make that team good. Its newey, its horner's strategy. Its webber and coulthard experience. Its vettel who is a young shumi in the making. I have confidence they can still be a championship contender after the new engine's and regulations.
Also i like the team more than ferrari and mclaren, ferrari and mclaren in a lesser way are so uptight.

No matter what you're going to say, it's true.

Both McLaren and Ferrari made horrendous cars in 2009. If McLaren had the car they had at the end of 2009 at the start of 2009, RBR wouldn't have been so 'special'.

Don't get me wrong, I'm not taking away from RBR's success, they have very much created their own success, but they have had the good fortune of the two giants messing up for three years in a row.

EDIT: I've also gotta say that I'm a huge fan of post-Dennis McLaren. Whitmarsh is probably the best thing to happen to McLaren since Hamilton.

Sleeplessnights said:
Whatever happens in 2014, Red Bull have already established themselves as one of the big teams.

I think next year is going to be interesting; Mercedes, Renault and Williams (?) All hoping to make a winning car.

Red Bull already have established themselves as a top team. But the question remains whether or not RBR will still be here in 8 years as RBR. At the end of the day, they're owned by a drinks company.
 

Omiee

Member
Ark said:
No matter what you're going to say, it's true.

Both McLaren and Ferrari made horrendous cars in 2009. If McLaren had the car they had at the end of 2009 at the start of 2009, RBR wouldn't have been so 'special'.

Don't get me wrong, I'm not taking away from RBR's success, they have very much created their own success, but they have had the good fortune of the two giants messing up for three years in a row.


Look im not going to deny, 2009 was a horrible year for mclaren and ferrari, and red bull and brawn were the teams to benefit from that. But in my opinion thats taking away from the huge effort red bull has put in to get them were they are now.

They made all the right decisions. 2009 they were right there with brawn, 2010 they were amazing all year long, and this year the team benefited the most of the new tyres.

Just because ferrari and mclaren made all the wrong decisions, doesn't mean red bull was lucky. It means ferrari and mclaren were stupid. not red bull being lucky.

Also mclaren chose to ditch the 09 car instead of improving it like red bull did. Thats their decision. If the 2009 car was that good, why dident they just improve on it like red bull did with their car?

Ark said:
Red Bull already have established themselves as a top team. But the question remains whether or not RBR will still be here in 8 years as RBR. At the end of the day, they're owned by a drinks company.

I disagree, they have no reason to step out of the sport. the whole image red bull has is cool and sport etc. Thats a image that they want to keep with their red bull planes, motorsport etc. Also they are not spending millions like the other big teams used to. They have a reasonable budget and i think they are making a profit. ( i should look this up )
Also dont they get like 100 million or more from the constructors championship?


EDIT: i found this

http://www.pitpass.com/40208-Red-Bull-spending-accelerates

Old article but still.

I remember horner saying the boss of red bull gives them just enough budget, but he never says no if they can justify why they need the money.

http://www.f1network.net/boards/read/s107.htm?110,9624398

dont remember if this is true, but that alone would give them enough budget.
 

Ark

Member
Omiee said:
Also mclaren chose to ditch the 09 car instead of improving it like red bull did. Thats their decision. If the 2009 car was that good, why dident they just improve on it like red bull did with their car?

Beats me. I'm going to presume it had something to do with the double diffuser.

Just because ferrari and mclaren made all the wrong decisions, doesn't mean red bull was lucky. It means ferrari and mclaren were stupid. not red bull being lucky.

Exactly, so RBR got lucky. You contradicted yourself here ;)

I disagree, they have no reason to step out of the sport. the whole image red bull has is cool and sport etc. Thats a image that they want to keep with their red bull planes, motorsport etc. Also they are not spending millions like the other big teams used to. They have a reasonable budget and i think they are making a profit. ( i should look this up )
Also dont they get like 100 million or more from the constructors championship?

Same could be said for Renault in 2005 & 2006.

Although regardless of their WCC bonus, they wont get half as much money as McLaren and Ferrari do from the magical history money pot :p

dont remember if this is true, but that alone would give them enough budget

I'm not calling their budget into question, just the longevity of the team. Will RBR still be around in 10 years? Who knows.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom