Well, they let the contractors go, thats probably the extent of it. It's not like ND dont have other stuff to work on. (and by all accounts I think this was cancelled a while ago, its just now they are acknowledging it)How many people will be fired from ND because of this?
Nowadays cancelations end up in firing people...
Well at the very least hopefully the person that greenlit the project without realising it would need post release support!!!!?????!!!!!,lol.How many people will be fired from ND because of this?
Nowadays cancelations end up in firing people...
This stupid chase for the easy GaaS money is having a very negative impact in the industry.Well, they let the contractors go, thats probably the extent of it. It's not like ND dont have other stuff to work on. (and by all accounts I think this was cancelled a while ago, its just now they are acknowledging it)
Yes they can AI upscale the textures. That would be $70 money please.maybe they can remaster the original factions
Could be true, seeing how fiercely Sony top brass hate their customersIt was so good they had to cancel it?
You guys just eat up sony spin.
It was so good they had to cancel it?
You guys just eat up sony spin.
Right?Looks like Bungie wins after all...
Well you can understand it from Sony's point of view, IF they could create a successful GaaS game or two those could fund other games, but honestly their own first party generally fund themselves at this point, but the problem is because their games are so expensive (and rightly so with the scale and quality of games they make) then they do like to take the safe route. I'd personally like a few of their studios to make less costly games can be made though, even if classed as experimental games to see what sticks, or even take more chances with their existing IP's on alternative modes, like Ragnarok Valhalla, that DLC proves that they could in theory make a full game out of that DLC, sell it for $20-$30 and just make it a lot bigger, introduce elements from ALL of the GOW games, add all previous bosses, have more locations etc.This stupid chase for the easy GaaS money is having a very negative impact in the industry.
They had studios making less costly smaller games and they shifted them to GAAS games or shut them down (like PixelOpus).Well you can understand it from Sony's point of view, IF they could create a successful GaaS game or two those could fund other games, but honestly their own first party generally fund themselves at this point, but the problem is because their games are so expensive (and rightly so with the scale and quality of games they make) then they do like to take the safe route. I'd personally like a few of their studios to make less costly games can be made though, even if classed as experimental games to see what sticks, or even take more chances with their existing IP's on alternative modes, like Ragnarok Valhalla, that DLC proves that they could in theory make a full game out of that DLC, sell it for $20-$30 and just make it a lot bigger, introduce elements from ALL of the GOW games, add all previous bosses, have more locations etc.
No. No, you wouldn’t. There have been many, many enjoyable and successful multiplayer experiences that were “one and done” without being a live service.we'd have to put all our studio resources behind supporting post launch content for years to come
It was so good they had to cancel it?
You guys just eat up sony spin.
I mean their AAA studios making experimental/cheaper games/modes, which is what they are kinda doing such as Ragnarok Valhalla and the rogue like mode in TLoU Part 2 Remaster thing. I'd like them to try more than just rogue like modes though, for one or two games that's fine but that should be enough. Ghost of Tsushima tried something a little different with their Legends DLC which was fun also.They had studios making less costly smaller games and they shifted them to GAAS games or shut them down (like PixelOpus).
While yes, they may have made a misstep with this GaaS (but that may all have been due to upper PlayStation management rather than ND themselves), we don't know the state of their other games so I think its way too early to tell if there are any internal issues at ND (I dont think there is, it wouldnt surprise me if at some later date it comes out that this was originally intended to be a standard Factions multiplayer and higher ups were pushing for the GaaS model)That fucking sucks. I loved factions. Naughty Dog only releasing remakes / remasters this whole gen so far is really disappointing too. Gotta be some serious project management issues going on over there.
Glad they are going to make a SP game I'll play through to the end rather than a MP game I'll play for 30 minutes and admire, then never touch again.
Pretty pathetic. They should have just wasted less time bloating up TLOU2 and used it to include MP with the game like we got with 1.
Eh. I enjoyed my time with yearly CoD a decade ago but things are way different now. Players want skins, voice lines, gadgets and Battle Passes to grind for and all those at a frequent cadence. I mean I've been following the Street Fighter 6 discourse since release and the majority of it was "where are more costumes we can buy". People were actually mad at Capcom for not churning out $10 DLC per character, nevermind giving free shit. When they released the Costume #3 trailer you can see the spike in Steam users, and they didn't even update the game.And that’s what I will never understand. The forever game. It’s stupid. I don’t want to play a game for 100 hours. Let alone 5000. No game is that good. Gaas is essentially a bad idea.
He isn't saying gamers are bad, he's making fun of the haters.
Not many resources? these games (remakes/remasters) arent being made by the main teams within ND.How do you work like 3 years on a project and realize you can't do it? How embarrassing, and even worse is all the resources in general put into 10+ or almost 5+ year old games. Imagine if they put the work they had in TLOU1 remake or TLOU2 remaster into the games they're currently working on. It's been a long time since Naughty Dog has confirmed anything.
Yes. But they said they are working on TWO brand new single player games. The only thing that makes any sense is a new IP AND TLOU 3. Which is what I’ve been saying for 3 years and has also been hinted at by all the “insiders”A "brand new single player game" is not necessarily "new IP". TLOU 3 would be a "brand new single player game".