• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

The Legend of Korra: Book 4 |OT2| ALL HAIL THE GREAT UNITER

Status
Not open for further replies.

Daemul

Member
Unalaq > Kuvira

come at me bro

tumblr_myvv07At841rmin5no1_400.gif


Unalaq is the worst villain in the entire series.
 

Crocodile

Member
Unalaq is straight booty. Nothing he did made any sense and at no point was it clear what he wanted or why he wanted it :/

Yep I uttered the same thing last month. Dude is just too OP to fucking fight that's why he didn't have one single good fight scene. He just swagged his way through book one fucking people up with his OP as fuck blood bending. Fuck that shit. Kuvira might've been a bit fragile and not fully realized as a character, but at the very least you can fight her, same with Unalaq. His bending was crisp as fuck for an evil douche bag. He wasn't overpowered, dude knew his shit. Zaheer wasn't even that OP, nobody just knew how to fight airbenders and he used it as a natural extension to his acrobatic martial arts style.

Something I've seen way too few writers do (worldwide) is actually think through the implications of their villain design. The standard way, and it's a standard because it has proven to be effective storytelling across time (see the "Hero's Journey" and other such fiction models), is to make your antagonist much more powerful than your heroes for most or the entirety of the narrative. However, many authors get so wrapped up in making their villain "godlike" that they write themselves into a corner. When it comes to end the narrative and the hero(es) has to confront the "final boss", given the nature of how conflicts are resolved in their world and the relative skills and abilities of the protagonists, there is no realistic way the protagonists can actually win. So they have to resort to bullshit Deus ex Machina, people have to selectively grab hold of the idiot ball, etc. for the "good guys" to win. This often makes for a very unsatisfying/frustrating/outright bad final confrontation and ending for the reader.

Though it can be hard I believe that when writing a heroes vs villains story, people should plan out far in advance how they intend their villain to lose to ensure a satisfying an logical ending. Shit, Dragonball Z of all shows was even able to do this. Goku was able to beat Frieza due to the Super Saiyan power-up but the show made sure you knew about Super Sayians and their lore like 50 episodes before Goku even meets Frieza and constantly reminds you about it. As such, the conclusion of the fight is expected and logical within the context of that world rather than an ass-pull (not that DBZ isn't full of asspulls in other respects :p)
 

360pages

Member
Unalaq is straight booty. Nothing he did made any sense and at no point was it clear what he wanted or why he wanted it :/



Something I've seen way too few writers do (worldwide) is actually think through the implications of their villain design. The standard way, and it's a standard because it has proven to be effective storytelling across time (see the "Hero's Journey" and other such fiction models), is to make your antagonist much more powerful than your heroes for most or the entirety of the narrative. However, many authors get so wrapped up in making their villain "godlike" that they write themselves into a corner. When it comes to end the narrative and the hero(es) has to confront the "final boss", given the nature of how conflicts are resolved in their world and the relative skills and abilities of the protagonists, there is no realistic way the protagonists can actually win. So they have to resort to bullshit Deus ex Machina, people have to selectively grab hold of the idiot ball, etc. for the "good guys" to win. This often makes for a very unsatisfying/frustrating/outright bad final confrontation and ending for the reader.

Though it can be hard I believe that when writing a heroes vs villains story, people should plan out far in advance how they intend their villain to lose to ensure a satisfying an logical ending. Shit, Dragonball Z of all shows was even able to do this. Goku was able to beat Frieza due to the Super Saiyan power-up but the show made sure you knew about Super Sayians and their lore like 50 episodes before Goku even meets Frieza and constantly reminds you about it. As such, the conclusion of the fight is expected and logical within the context of that world rather than an ass-pull (not that DBZ isn't full of asspulls in other respects :p)

To be fair, all the final fights up to the Buu Saga were able to avoid Deus Ex Machina. The Victory against Vegeta was a group effort, Super Saiyan was hinted at throughout the entire arc and Gohan's potential and anger had been a running theme for him throughout the entire series.
 
To be fair, all the final fights up to the Buu Saga were able to avoid Deus Ex Machina. The Victory against Vegeta was a group effort, Super Saiyan was hinted at throughout the entire arc and Gohan's potential and anger had been a running theme for him throughout the entire series.
Yeah Gohan's potential was hinted at since the Raditz fight and it finally culminated in him taking out Cell. It was a nice passing of the torch moment, then the Buu saga happened. That is my least favorite saga. Irritating villain.
 

Daemul

Member
still browsing =/

I've had to stop for the day. I gotta try and finish off my latest campaign of Medieval 2 Total War before my cousin comes to visit this weekend. The Pope is being a complete dick though, he threatened me with excommunication for going to war with the Holy Roman Empire, even though they attacked me first(well, I provoked them into attacking me by assassinating their Emperor and many members of their Royal family, but let's not get technical :p)

You know what, fuck it, I got loads of coin, I'm gonna give a "donation" to the church so that the Pope turns a blind eye and leaves me to defeating the HRE and getting this damn campaign over with.

Once I finish I can finally get back to looking at some more Owler art :p
 
Serious question, why do people like Kuvira?

I think she's a terrible villian. She isn't even particularly threatening because she can be beat by one avatar state air gust. Her best fight is with Su, who isn't even a main character. She's weak. Weak characters don't make good villians. They can, but they need exposition and exploration. Look at Lex Luthor. He's weak compared to Superman. He is not a physical threat. But he's so much more fleshed out with his views on human potential and how Superman ruins that. He's also extremely intelligent so he regularly manipulates the world to his own end.

Kuvira wants to unify the earth empire. OK. Why exactly did she feel so strongly about it? The show says "because Su". Why did she want Republic City so bad? It existed before she was even born right? Why does she have these feelings of being wronged? I don't know, she just rings as a very hollow and superficial character. Unalaq is pretty bad too, so I guess the best I can do is say she's equal to his shit tier level. His only redeeming quality is that the show doesn't try to rationalize his evilness in some half assed 10 second exposition in the last ten minutes of the season.

Another reason I think I don't like Kuvira is because she's just not a good villian to end a series on in terms of design and presence. As I mentioned she's rather mundane, especially compared to other villians. Amon is OP as fuck. Unalaq, and Vaatu more specifically, is a cosmic, universe-tier conflict. Even Zaheer, who seems rather simple, can fly.

So in conclusion, kuvira sux
 
Serious question, why do people like Kuvira?

I think she's a terrible villian. She isn't even particularly threatening because she can be beat by one avatar state air gust. Her best fight is with Su, who isn't even a main character. She's weak. Weak characters don't make good villians. They can, but they need exposition and exploration. Look at Lex Luthor. He's weak compared to Superman. He is not a physical threat. But he's so much more fleshed out with his views on human potential and how Superman ruins that. He's also extremely intelligent so he regularly manipulates the world to his own end.

Kuvira wants to unify the earth empire. OK. Why exactly did she feel so strongly about it? The show says "because Su". Why did she want Republic City so bad? It existed before she was even born right? Why does she have these feelings of being wronged? I don't know, she just rings as a very hollow and superficial character. Unalaq is pretty bad too, so I guess the best I can do is say she's equal to his shit tier level. His only redeeming quality is that the show doesn't try to rationalize his evilness in some half assed 10 second exposition in the last ten minutes of the season.

Another reason I think I don't like Kuvira is because she's just not a good villian to end a series on in terms of design and presence. As I mentioned she's rather mundane, especially compared to other villians. Amon is OP as fuck. Unalaq, and Vaatu more specifically, is a cosmic, universe-tier conflict. Even Zaheer, who seems rather simple, can fly.

So in conclusion, kuvira sux
She's a flawed human being and you can kind of tell that they wanted to go that route with her, before everything got out of hand with her narrative. Despite that she still earned the trust of her troops and she was legit correct on several fronts. She was wronged by Su when Su tried to kill her, she was wronged by the politicians when they tried to boot her out to set up some half ass Reaganesque puppet regime with Wu. She was right when she said somebody had to unite the Earth Kingdom as well. She took that shit too far, but somebody had to do something, but everybody just wanted to sit on their fucking hands and wait for the problem to solve itself, which it would've after everybody was dead. Her reasons might have been because she didn't want everybody to feel abandoned like she did growing up, but it's sort of noble, though as I said she took that shit too far. If they didn't force Nazi ethics on her to make her feel like more of a villain she would've been fine. They never tried to portray her as her own person. Amon had OP swag, Unalaq was an evil douche bag and Zaheer was like your friendly neighborhood anarchist with a bad ass crew and a mission. There's stuff they could've done better I'll admit, but at the very least she wasn't Unalaq. Only thing they did right with him was keep his tone consistent. He was a villain, nothing more, nothing less...unless he pretty much just did all that shit for a petty sibling rivalry with Tonraq.
 
Well we're almost on the same page. I just think Kuvira is less bad.

I like her character design, the way she speaks, and her fighting style a lot more than Unalaq at least.

But even so, I don't think she's that bad, just lackluster compared to Zaheer and Amon.
 
Well we're almost on the same page. I just think Kuvira is less bad.

I like her character design, the way she speaks, and her fighting style a lot more than Unalaq at least.

But even so, I don't think she's that bad, just lackluster compared to Zaheer and Amon.

I mean, at least Unalaq was manipulative too?

Kuvira is just Hitler. And no Toa, not good Hitler.
 

Hamlet

Member
Yeah I also quite liked Kuvira's character design and those brief moments where she stopped being stoic and allowed the smugness to come were quite fun to watch.
Unalaq did the worst thing for me where he was just a dull/boring villain to watch.
 
Yeah I also quite liked Kuvira's character design and those brief moments where she stopped being stoic and allowed the smugness to come were quite fun to watch.
Unalaq did the worst thing for me where he was just a dull/boring villain to watch.
They really needed to stop having her as stoic. She's fine when she's actually emoting like a human, but a season full of stoic didn't help her character at all. There was a lot of fun they could've actually had with her. Dio isn't stoic, but the audience sure as fuck knows he's a villain.
 

Trey

Member
Season 1 was magnificent aside from the love triangle torpedoing character growth and pacing, Mako being at max douchebagginess, and motherfucking Endgame.
 

Daemul

Member
They dun fucked up with Amon and the love triangle, but apart from that, it was pretty decent. Pro bending is the best thing, apart from Asami, that happened to the series, anyone who says otherwise is 100% wrong.

It was so damn cool.
 
They dun fucked up with Amon and the love triangle, but apart from that, it was pretty decent. Pro bending is the best thing, apart from Asami, that happened to the series, anyone who says otherwise is 100% wrong.
In before Tak heralds Kuvira as the best thing or that kaiju fight.
 

Toa TAK

Banned
Pretty sure Kuvira was the best thing to happen in this series.

She had so much confidence in what she was doing, she could've given some to Korra and the rest of the cast.
 
Pretty sure Kuvira was the best thing to happen in this series.

She had so much confidence in what she was doing, she could've given some to Korra and the rest of the cast.
And you said this 39 minutes after my in before post. Lol. She had confidence I won't deny that. Too bad Korra sucked most of it out of her at the end.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom