Well, the real fake question, then...
damn u got me
Well, the real fake question, then...
there's no objective metric such that having this many frames as opposed to that many frames automatically detracts some amount from a score
if you accept this, then logically you have to accept that it's ultimately the overall subjective experience a game achieves for you that's most relevant, and we kind of maneuver through all the moving pieces in a somewhat arbitrary way
if the technical issues or limitations a game has noticeably interfere with the height or depth of that subjective experience, then they'll clearly deduct from the score
on the other hand, if the technical issues a game has don't noticeably interfere? if they feel like part of a compromise to achieve something that wouldn't have been possible with an emphasis on technical flawlessness? if it doesn't feel like they reflect a lack of technical competence (in fact, the game might be technically impressive in other ways) or an overall lack of polish, but merely reflect the limitations that the design of a game cut itself against? maybe that's a different story
i kinda feel like being a technical marvel tends to boost a review score more than not being a technical marvel tends to detract from one, because your capacity to notice the achievement is equal to your capacity to adjust to imperfect performance and aesthetics that don't rely on cutting edge graphics, depending on the quality of everything else
What was the prophecy?
When people were guessing Metacritic scores before the reviews dropped, throwing around low to mid 90s estimates (which would have been my guess as well), Duckroll came in hot with that 98. It sounded insane at the time but boy did he call it.
As someone who hasn't played a Nintendo game since the SNES days. Is this game good or not? Why is this thread so confusing and controversial?
When people were guessing Metacritic scores before the reviews dropped, throwing around low to mid 90s estimates (which would have been my guess as well), Duckroll came in hot with that 98. It sounded insane at the time but boy did he call it.
I think the real question is... if we were to remove all the Zelda trappings, and release the game under another name, would it still receive the same torrent of perfect scores? We won't be able to say either way until we get our hands on the game.
The scores don't matter. The text of those reviews, the consensus, is that this is the greatest game of all time. Greater than OoT.
As someone who hasn't played a Nintendo game since the SNES days. Is this game good or not? Why is this thread so confusing and controversial?
As someone who hasn't played a Nintendo game since the SNES days. Is this game good or not? Why is this thread so confusing and controversial?
98 at 61 reviews. That means it's basically for sure going to hold at 98, right?
Any word on how the Wii U version tastes?
GTA IV and Pro Skater 2?
I honestly don't believe this yet. We'll see
We don't know but it seens the Switch version tastes really bad.
98 at 61 reviews. That means it's basically for sure going to hold at 98, right?
GTA IV and Pro Skater 2?
106 pages and we still like:
98 at 61 reviews. That means it's basically for sure going to hold at 98, right?
I'm just kidding around, I think it's funny because of Twilight Princess 8.8-gate so long ago, and now Horizon literally has an 88 at Metacritic. I'm not trying to bring it down or anything though, I've already seen and heard a lot about it, it looks good.
It would probably receive the same amount of praise. Imagine a nobody developer releasing a new IP of this caliber out of the blue.
I spent a good deal of time exploring and analyzing my thoughts on this subject in my review and the accompanying addendum article (DigitalChumps).Which reviews talk about the quality of the main dungeons?
Fuck why did I cancel my Switch preorder a week ago.
GTA IV and Pro Skater 2?
For real. That game was amazing.I'm assuming everyone taking a dump on THPS2 was born in 2003 or something.
I'm assuming everyone taking a dump on THPS2 was born in 2003 or something.
I'm very pleasently surprised by the reception Zelda is getting though. I thought it would be low 80's. Picked it up this morning and hoping for the best - I've never been an open world man though, so it's likely I'll enjoy it much less than most critics.
I'm assuming everyone taking a dump on THPS2 was born in 2003 or something.
I'm very pleasently surprised by the reception Zelda is getting though. I thought it would be low 80's. Picked it up this morning and hoping for the best - I've never been an open world man though, so it's likely I'll enjoy it much less than most critics.
For real. That game was amazing.
To the contrary, coming off SS and the way everyone sort of soured on it months down the road, I am willing to bet that I was not the only reviewer who approached BotW with a uniquely critical introductory attitude. Excitement, yes, but the franchise's legacy didn't necessarily benefit it in this regard.Well, the hypothetical question didn't require it to be a "nobody" developer. However, I see the appeal of removing all the baggage associated with a known developer. I think part of the problem with a new developer is that it is a lot easier to knock a new IP down a peg than it is to do the same with the new Zelda game.
The truth is, very few games, even games that are essentially flawless, review so consistently highly. Which isn't a bad thing, by the way. Horizon (as this appears to be THE game to compare Zelda to for some reason) was received brilliantly, as an example. But it still had dissenting voices. It is odd that the Zelda series (which is always consistently solid at the very least) seems to receive unique treatment in that regard.
GTA IV and Pro Skater 2?
Tony Hawk easily deserves that position, GTA IV could be lower but still massive game for its time.
I think the real question is... if we were to remove all the Zelda trappings, and release the game under another name, would it still receive the same torrent of perfect scores?
I'm assuming everyone taking a dump on THPS2 was born in 2003 or something.
I'm very pleasently surprised by the reception Zelda is getting though. I thought it would be low 80's. Picked it up this morning and hoping for the best - I've never been an open world man though, so it's likely I'll enjoy it much less than most critics.
Yeah while reviews aren't all that important to me I can only imagine those people haven't played it as that game was legit incredible
98 at 61 reviews. That means it's basically for sure going to hold at 98, right?
It won't stay 98. Review scores tend to go down over time, rather than up, for reasons I won't speculate on.
Still damn impressive.