rogue_pigeon said:
The difference being that the commercial entity can say what they like to pull in viewers/readers and then nonchalantly flush that part away when an accurate report comes in. Saying there's a 'high risk' of something is just a typically non-committal way to report bullshit.
Sky Sport is a pay-per-view, so your argument is automatically debunked. Too many people are keen to jump to conclusions when speaking about something they don't know about, but I guess you're a Sky Sport Italia subscriber? And again, they're not your typical Murdoch, Fox or UK Daily/Sun/whatever garbage.
Gazzetta dello Sport reports the same, are they unreliable too? Do you know what GDS is?
And why the fuck are we even talking about this? Multiple sources and outlets are reporting it, should we just not post about it? Or argue semantics?