Is the bendable thing a legit complaint or just people being stupid?
Seeing as there are millions of phones out there and a few reports, I would say its either stupid or super unlucky.
Is the bendable thing a legit complaint or just people being stupid?
You're confusing revenue vs profit with an absurd scenario. Let me clarify your example for you and the other art majors here.
Company A and B make salt shakers.
Company A uses slightly better quality components in their salt shaker, costing $1 to manufacture compared to $.90 for Company B's salt shaker.
Company A sells their salt shaker for $1.10, Company B sells theirs for $1.50.
Both companies provide replacement parts which cost them both $.08 to make and are sold for $.10 from company A, and $.20 from company B.
Assuming Company A sells 1000 units with a 20% replacement part purchasing rate, that's a cost of goods sold of $1016. They then made $1120 in sales, for a profit of $104.
Assuming Company A sells 500 units with a 20% replacement part purchasing rate, that's a cost of goods sold of $458. They then made $770 in sales, for a profit of $312.
Thus Company A sells twice as much as Company B, yet Company B pulls in 3x the profit as company A.
As you can see, being Company B is absolutely great. Being a customer of Company B makes you an absolute moron.
Tek, do you recognize the problem with calling people morons/stupid/illiterate for preferring a different product than you?
You ever just read the Internet and think man, this shit is bananasHe's made the assumption that a thick layer of seething rage adds to his argument... rather than takes away all power from his argument and makes him an amusing figure suitable for our enjoyment.
You're one of these people without a job who sits at home and pretends to have a job when really you just browsing reddit?
I know its hard for you to understand but I'm gonna make this really simple for you.
Money = good
Company making money = good
Company losing money = bad
You want to be the company that makes money, i.e. Apple.
Oh. My. God.
You are not Apple. I am not Apple. No one here is Apple.
You are Apple's CUSTOMER.
You are not Company B. You are the CUSTOMER of Company B.
Do you not get this?
Oh shit sorry, I thought we were discussing the companies here and not the costumers. You can see how that's confusing seeing as you talked about company profits and so on.
It's amazing, but after all the consumer psychology courses, I never really had it click for me until now.
Watching an Apple users equate themselves with their company, to the point that Apple making huge profits by price-gouging them is somehow a good thing, just made everything click.
I need to email my old marketing professor and let him know I finally got it.
You're confusing revenue vs profit with an absurd scenario. Let me clarify your example for you and the other art majors here.
Company A and B make salt shakers.
Company A uses slightly better quality components in their salt shaker, costing $1 to manufacture compared to $.90 for Company B's salt shaker.
Company A sells their salt shaker for $1.10, Company B sells theirs for $1.50.
Both companies provide replacement parts which cost them both $.08 to make and are sold for $.10 from company A, and $.20 from company B.
Assuming Company A sells 1000 units with a 20% replacement part purchasing rate, that's a cost of goods sold of $1016. They then made $1120 in sales, for a profit of $104.
Assuming Company A sells 500 units with a 20% replacement part purchasing rate, that's a cost of goods sold of $458. They then made $770 in sales, for a profit of $312.
Thus Company A sells twice as much as Company B, yet Company B pulls in 3x the profit as company A.
As you can see, being Company B is absolutely great. Being a customer of Company B makes you an absolute moron.
Rezuth and others are arguing that, because Apple (similar to Company B) is making over 75% of the market's profits despite having less than 15% of quarterly sales, that that somehow makes them smart consumers. In reality, it makes them the exact opposite. They are cash cows being fleeced by a company that sells equivalent (if we're being generous) products for a massive price premium.
Cheers!
I love my 6+ with 128GB. I have the Apple leather case to prevent slippage.
And this is a great second place!
This is one of the greatest things I've ever seen in these fanboy wars. Kudos.
I'll be here all week!
I'm not even sure what we're "discussing" at this point.
OP, buy an Android if you like to customize. If you just want a vanilla experience that works well, get the iPhone.
Of course. I'm just happy with the outcome. I'll discount my experience with the iPhone 5 since the battery was deemed faulty under the replacement program, but with the 5s, I'd probably average 24 hours on one charge and I'd be pretty worried to go out for a few hours with less than 35% battery left.Honestly, if the 6+ was the size it is currently and DIDN'T have stellar battery life then it would be a massive failure. I don't really see how that is impressive though given its' size. The amount of battery they can fit in their phones increases exponentially as the phone gets larger.
Or maybe I'm being too negative, I dunno. If the battery life of all their phones across the board didn't decrease by ~10% with every major iOS update then maybe I'd be more lenient.
Apple sells their phones at a high margin and people buy it, the competition wish could get those type of margins. You can say that Apple's phones are overpriced (I think they are), but they are running a business and any business would want to have high margins that they can maintain.
Not having a micro SD slot is a major problem imo
Well, the problem is that you're arguing two points at once:It's amazing, but after all the consumer psychology courses, I never really had it click for me until now.
Watching an Apple users equate themselves with their company, to the point that Apple making huge profits by price-gouging them is somehow a good thing, just made everything click.
I need to email my old marketing professor and let him know I finally got it.
I've had iPhone since the first and certainly enjoy them, but I'll say that the iPhone really is fantastic, but it's iOS that's a POS. Ever since iOS 7, it's done nothing but turn into a buggy mess. iOS use to be as close to stable as one could expect.
TLDR: I don't the expect you to last long in business school if your paper on why Apple has been successful is basically "People are morons who happily give Apple money for substandard products."
what the hell is going on in this thread?
OP, get the Note 4 or Nexus 6.
buuuuuut, if you REALLY ABSOLUTELY MUST have every single mobile game ever available to you on day 1, get the iPhone. just know that sea salt tastes better, but is less healthy. something something iodone.
Has it ever crossed your mind that the consumers you so nonchalantly call idiots have access to and understand the same information you do, but instead of demonizing Apple have arrived at the conclusion that their products are actually worth the price?All of this is true, but maintaining over 75% of the market's profits while selling only 15% of the units isn't just "high margins". It's the type of absurdity that completely changes the way we think of marketing and consumer psychology.
Has it ever crossed your mind that the consumers you so nonchalantly call idiots have access to and understand the same information you do, but instead of demonizing Apple have arrived at the conclusion that their products are actually worth the price?
I don't know, I'm just scrolling past all that fighting since it's completely unrelated to what I'm interested in but thanks for the recommendation on Note 4.what the hell is going on in this thread?
Nope, I got an Apple case studies in Innovation and e-commerce, and Value Creation and Management. Granted I didn't feel the need to continue my studies and move on to an MBA, But I'd wager that Apple isn't a focus of operations, strategic management, etc because they are incredibly secretive and don't really let out that sort of information for there to be much to make a case study upon. But they are known to be excellent at managing supply chain and inventory and guess what, that helps with turning a profit.I graduated years ago.
But here's a neat experiment for you. Take a glance at the case studies used in any MBA course. You'll see numerous Apple cases.
None of them are used in Finance. None of them are used in Operations. None of them are used in Organizational Tactics. None of them are used in Strategic Management.
The one place you'll find Apple case studies being used in MBA programs is in the Consumer Psychology courses.
Because Apple isn't interesting for its management, its production, its products, or its supply chains. It's interesting because of its consumers.
iTunes? I seem to remember that one.Nope, I got an Apple case studies in Innovation and e-commerce, and Value Creation and Management.
It's always amusing how this kind of thread derailing and massive aggression gets you banned on gaming side really fast but in off topic it's fine to call other gaf'ers morons.
iTunes? I seem to remember that one.
I should have clarified I was speaking specifically about the smartphone environment. Apple did some amazing things getting the music industry online, even if they did hold onto the model for too long.
There's insults from all sides, precious. At least in this discussion we're mixing it with actual data.
If it's offending you, there's an iOS community thread you can retreat to.
You're confusing revenue vs profit with an absurd scenario. Let me clarify your example for you and the other art majors here.
Company A and B make salt shakers.
Company A uses slightly better quality components in their salt shaker, costing $1 to manufacture compared to $.90 for Company B's salt shaker.
Company A sells their salt shaker for $1.10, Company B sells theirs for $1.50.
Both companies provide replacement parts which cost them both $.08 to make and are sold for $.10 from company A, and $.20 from company B.
Assuming Company A sells 1000 units with a 20% replacement part purchasing rate, that's a cost of goods sold of $1016. They then made $1120 in sales, for a profit of $104.
Assuming Company A sells 500 units with a 20% replacement part purchasing rate, that's a cost of goods sold of $458. They then made $770 in sales, for a profit of $312.
Thus Company A sells twice as much as Company B, yet Company B pulls in 3x the profit as company A.
As you can see, being Company B is absolutely great. Being a customer of Company B makes you an absolute moron.
Rezuth and others are arguing that, because Apple (similar to Company B) is making over 75% of the market's profits despite having less than 15% of quarterly sales, that that somehow makes them smart consumers. In reality, it makes them the exact opposite. They are cash cows being fleeced by a company that sells equivalent (if we're being generous) products for a massive price premium.
If it's offending you, there's an iOS community thread you can retreat to.
Has it ever crossed your mind that the consumers you so nonchalantly call idiots have access to and understand the same information you do, but instead of demonizing Apple have arrived at the conclusion that their products are actually worth the price?
Can you make a single post without being condescending? Someone doesn't have to be an iOS user to get irritated by your constant attacks on people who buy things you don't like.
The iPhone 6 Plus running the latest version of iOS 8 has bugs every step of the way.
I am still confident its the best experience available right now but whoa boy its a little underbaked.
This is an Apple thread. Where 500 ppi is less than 330 ppi, a fixed battery is preferable to a removable battery, double-price peripherals are fine, limited storage is great, and where we identify with the company to the point that Apple making 75%+ of the profits with less than 15% of the unit sales is good.
Condescending is the only way to cut through the religious-tier bullshit.
This is an Apple thread. Where 500 ppi is less than 330 ppi, a fixed battery is preferable to a removable battery, double-price peripherals are fine, limited storage is great, and where we identify with the company to the point that Apple making 75%+ of the profits with less than 15% of the unit sales is good.
Condescending is the only way to cut through the religious-tier bullshit. My posts aren't mean to convince brand zealots to do basic technical comparisons. They're for observers who've heard Apple's hype but aren't certain if its real or not.
Plenty of others are using the same insults and same attitude. You don't see me whining about them, do you? It's always the guys without a platform to stand on that cry the loudest about the debate style.