Chezzymann
Member
I think there are parallels to be drawn though, seems like a wave of nationalism is growing in developed nationsI think it's absolutely insane that people are dragging Trump into this. Like can we not? For once?
I think there are parallels to be drawn though, seems like a wave of nationalism is growing in developed nationsI think it's absolutely insane that people are dragging Trump into this. Like can we not? For once?
This.Considering that Art.50 is entirely untested there will absolutely be some wiggle room to interpret the referendum and its result as informing the EU of the intention to leave.
Also get the fuck outta here with the "When has the law ever mattered to the EU".
Its like a Mexican voting for Trump.
I think it's absolutely insane that people are dragging Trump into this. Like can we not? For once?
You're spot on.
I feel like you make a very compelling argument for the UK not being in the EU even if I do disagree, but I'm not from the UK. Unfortunately it wasn't the reason most people voted like that.
I wish I could get SmokeyDave's hot take from this.
despite consisting of several countries the EU is one big single marketplace, goods, jobs, tech, science, education, you name it.
with those deals nullified, GB needs to renegotiate EVERYTHING and no matter what, GB will be left with a worse deal than before. now there are non EU countries which have access(with restrictions) to that single big market but they pay a lot for that, GB will have to do the same and most likely will pay more than before and on top doesn't have any say anymore over EU politics as they are not a member anymore.
it is also bad for other eu nations as GB was always a reasonable voice against too much EU regulations, with that out the door, Germany and France can go ham and smaller countries will just have to suck it up.
there are a lot of eu citizens working in GB but also a lot of british people working throughout the EU, we don't know what will happen to them, as said earlier those deals don't apply anymore. jobs will be lost all because that referendum was done in order to secure reelection of a loosing david cameron where he promised to hold it once reelected to secure the votes of the far right.
he got reelected and initiated the referendum where noone believed this would happen, but it happened and they now have no plan.
the only possible saving grace is that unlike other referendums this one is not legally binding, meaning that if parliament doesn't act on it, that's totally fine.
what will happen remains to be seen, but it is a clusterfuck nonetheless
I wish I could get SmokeyDave's hot take from this.
Not just developed countries. We already have a Trump equivalent slowly rising in popularity as the left wing starts losing traction around here.I think there are parallels to be drawn though, seems like a wave of nationalism is growing in developed nations
Argument is if referendum can legally count as triggering art. 50
What else should they do? Legally ignore it and signal that the will of the people has no weight?
1. Any Member State may decide to withdraw from the Union in accordance with its own constitutional requirements.
This will only continue until societies introduce measures to embrace this change.
Fighting it in the way we are is futile. Accept the trends, not hang on to halcyon days of what should be.
I think it's absolutely insane that people are dragging Trump into this. Like can we not? For once?
You're spot on.
Argument is if referendum can legally count as triggering art. 50
How does this benefit UK economically in any way? It loses it's position and leverage in the world economy.
So we're just ignoring the revolutionary war here, taxation without representation, undue legal process, freedom of religion and press....Why is that so revolting? Economically it is the best thing that happened to the 13 Colonies.
The EU is going to be making an example of the UK so that doesn't happen.
Yeah, if Scotland/ Northern Ireland leave, abolition of Monarchy seems a likely occurrence.
I'm so glad the States of the US will be together forever.
It will right?
Trump blames Brexit on Obama.....THANKS OBAMA
http://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/2016/06/24/trump-blames-obama-brexit.cnn
I wish I could get SmokeyDave's hot take from this.
A position in which it was subservient to an unaccountable, bloated bureaucracy? Where bailing out weaker members is the norm? The UK will simply have to learn to stand on it's own, and considering that it was the economic power of the world one century ago, it should have no problem landing on it's feet.
A position in which it was subservient to an unaccountable, bloated bureaucracy? Where bailing out weaker members is the norm? The UK will simply have to learn to stand on it's own, and considering that it was the economic power of the world one century ago, it should have no problem landing on it's feet.
We had a vote, we informed the world.
The argument is that the referendum passing qualifies as invocation of Article 50.
Since when has the rule of law or democracy stopped the EU though?
Trump blames Brexit on Obama.....THANKS OBAMA
http://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/2016/06/24/trump-blames-obama-brexit.cnn
Coming in late, why are people flipping out over this?
I'd like to see a list of Pros and Cons for "Brexiting"?
Of course you can change the trends, we aren't talking about natural forces here, these are man made trends that can be unmade. Every time a factory closes down and is replaced by a financial services job you are creating 10 people resenting the new order for every 1 in favor of it. In democracies this will never last.
I think this is why Germany is so strong. They have a real manufacturing economy. I am extremely distrustful of "service based economies" in general. They seem like a Ponzi scheme that is destined to collapse with financial or political upheaval.
What if this starts a chain reaction and a bunch of other countries decide to leave the EU?
People always have a range of reasons for voting for things. I am sure some in remain voted because they believed that the UK could become an integral part of the EU eventually. However I am sure some that voted remain did it purely because they like all the good shit that the EU gives the UK and they don't give a toss how badly the UK holds the EU back.
At the end of the day I can only be held responsible for my vote. I voted for what I believe will be in the best long term interests of the EU and the UK. I know it will hurt both the EU and the UK (more so the UK) and believe me it terrifies the fuck out of me. But in the long term I believe this break up will be good for both.
I'm so glad the States of the US will be together forever.
It will right?
American Revolution was about basic human rights.
EU heads definitely will be looking to punish but ultimately the power comes down to industry heads and regional ministers. Juncker may be making a lot of noise about an immediate divorce but the main power players like Merkel will have the CEO of every German exporter at her doorstep demanding a smooth transition.
It may take a few months for the emotions to die down but the demands of the money makers will ultimately be the ones to set the pace of withdrawal.
but the answer is an obvious no if you read the article which requires (1) the withdrawing state to determine its own constitutional process of when to (2) for the withdrawing state to deliver notice of its intent to the EC
1. Any Member State may decide to withdraw from the Union in accordance with its own constitutional requirements.
2. A Member State which decides to withdraw shall notify the European Council of its intention. In the light of the guidelines provided by the European Council, the Union shall negotiate and conclude an agreement with that State, setting out the arrangements for its withdrawal, taking account of the framework for its future relationship with the Union. That agreement shall be negotiated in accordance with Article 218(3) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. It shall be concluded on behalf of the Union by the Council, acting by a qualified majority, after obtaining the consent of the European Parliament.
despite consisting of several countries the EU is one big single marketplace, goods, jobs, tech, science, education, you name it.
with those deals nullified, GB needs to renegotiate EVERYTHING and no matter what, GB will be left with a worse deal than before. now there are non EU countries which have access(with restrictions) to that single big market but they pay a lot for that, GB will have to do the same and most likely will pay more than before and on top doesn't have any say anymore over EU politics as they are not a member anymore.
I thought it was about a bunch of upstart rich folks deciding they no longer want to pay taxes.
That's not how the UK makes executive decisions.
I have a potentially ignorant question: how is this going to affect the rest of the EU? Is this mostly just bad for Britain or is it bad all around?
A position in which it was subservient to an unaccountable, bloated bureaucracy? Where bailing out weaker members is the norm? The UK will simply have to learn to stand on it's own, and considering that it was the economic power of the world one century ago, it should have no problem landing on it's feet.
I have a potentially ignorant question: how is this going to affect the rest of the EU? Is this mostly just bad for Britain or is it bad all around?