• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

The UK votes to leave the European Union

Status
Not open for further replies.

SuperSah

Banned
The EU should take the harshest stance for the good of the union, but at the same time I feel bad for this country and the 49% who didn't want this.

Literally half of us did not want this.

How the fuck do they restore faith of those who didn't whilst keeping Leave voters happy?
 

Foffy

Banned
The EU should take the harshest stance for the good of the union, but at the same time I feel bad for this country and the 49% who didn't want this.

Wouldn't it potentially fuel people who already have an isolationist view even further, as well?

You know, the type of people who go "I will ONLY get/use this if it's made HERE" type of isolationists.
 

RiggyRob

Member
Literally half of us did not want this.

How the fuck do they restore faith of those who didn't whilst keeping Leave voters happy?

Who are you referring to that needs to restore faith in Remain voters?

The EU could throw the book at us and quite frankly, they'd be justified in doing so.
 
Literally half of us did not want this.

How the fuck do they restore faith of those who didn't whilst keeping Leave voters happy?

What faith have to be restored?

UK voted to be out of the EU, and now EU will act in the benefit of the EU and it's 27 members, not in the benefit of the 49% of Remain voters that won't be EU citizens in 2 years.
 

Mael

Member
Means they simply don't get it. They think the problem is connected with the UK, not the EU. It won't reform itself in the nearest future. They don't have balls.

I wonder what will happen with all those European PM. Will they get some extra money if they lose their jobs? :)

They absolutely get it.
The UK wants out, they get out and is treated as such.
the European PM shouldn't receive any kind of benefits once they're out of the parliament, they're out after all.
 

Gotchaye

Member
Yeah if they ever get around to sorting out their frankly fucking crackpot gun laws, we should send Boris over to preach to them about how if they don't change, more people will die. That should go down well with middle America. Obama should have kept his fucking beak out.

Well, yes, the "crackpots" who are responsible for the US having terrible gun laws would be mad if a British leader encouraged the US to do what Obama and many other sensible Americans have been advocating for. I am not sure this is a great comparison for you to be making. Sure, maybe it was bad politics, but if it was bad politics it was bad politics because the people who responded poorly to Obama's statement are irrational crackpots. I guess he should have realized that, but surely if we accept this it reflects even more poorly on the irrational crackpots than on the person who did not realize the depths of crackpottery he was dealing with.
 
The EU should take the harshest stance for the good of the union, but at the same time I feel bad for this country and the 49% who didn't want this.

Taking a harsh stance with the UK won't be good for the EU.
We buy a lot of stuff off them.

I suppose it might help the bruised ego of the petty Remainers for a few days.
What is it about authoritarian lefties that they always have to punish everyone that doesn't agree with them?
 

Blader

Member
I think there's a difference between telling someone what to do and telling someone what will happen if they do that particular thing.
 
Unless people have already started chasing you up the street threatening to throw you out I think you are being a bit knee-jerky and silly.
I'm sure both of you will find your friends will still be your friends and I'm sure your colleagues will still work with you.

Can you see the irony of calling a whole nation closed minded twats?

I just love how apparently every single person who voted leave are small minded, racist, sexist idiots.

Added on with the idea that because ~53% of the U.K. voted to leave this also means 53% of the country hate people from other nationalities, which has to be true because, well, we took part in a democracy.

It's hilarious.
 

sangreal

Member
The EU should take the harshest stance for the good of the union, but at the same time I feel bad for this country and the 49% who didn't want this.

They should if setting an example is the paramount goal, but I think people are making this a 1-sided affair where the EU has all the leverage and that isn't really true. The UK is still a major economy, a net importer of EU goods, 1/2 of the EU's security council votes, etc.
 

EloKa

Member
Taking a harsh stance with the UK won't be good for the EU.
We buy a lot of stuff of them.

I suppose it might help the bruised ego of the petty Remainers for a few days.
What is it about authoritarian lefties that they always have to punish everyone that doesn't agree with them?

It's not a harsh stance to harm the UK. It's a harsh stance to protect the EU.
 

RetroDLC

Foundations of Burden
Could we negotiate having Scotland, Northern Ireland and everyone who voted remain to be given lifelong EU passport rights?
 

-Plasma Reus-

Service guarantees member status
Literally half of us did not want this.

How the fuck do they restore faith of those who didn't whilst keeping Leave voters happy?
They simply don't. Brexit campaign isn't concerned with anything but being able to change British legislation for worker rights and finance/business regulations. The EU was the thing stopping them.
They don't care much for anything else. And yes, that includes immigration.

Wouldn't it potentially fuel people who already have an isolationist view even further, as well?

You know, the type of people who go "I will ONLY get/use this if it's made HERE" type of isolationists.

It really doesn't look like the EU cares much for British sentiment at this point any more. This outcome has come at the worst possible timing for the EU and it will be trying its best to ensure the EU prospers. It can only do this if Britain is made an example of what happens when you leave the EU. I fear Britain will be left to its own devices, if not hampered whenever possible.
 

OceanBlue

Member
Taking a harsh stance with the UK won't be good for the EU.
We buy a lot of stuff of them.

I suppose it might help the bruised ego of the petty Remainers for a few days.
What is it about authoritarian lefties that they always have to punish everyone that doesn't agree with them?
They need a harsh stance to keep other member nations from leaving the EU.
 
What is it about authoritarian lefties that they always have to punish everyone that doesn't agree with them?

You're taking a pretty harsh stance yourself. It's not something that is exclusive to the left, it is something that everyone does: people don't like other people who disagree, and sometimes wish ill upon them. As a counter-example, people on the far-right want refugees to go back to their home countries where they may die of starvation or war. People are idiots and meanies everywhere. If you only think the other side is that way, then you've got a lot of growing up to do yourself.
 

platocplx

Member
They were Colonies and how is that even related to the subject ?

So basically since Rome has fucked over the whole Europe centuries ago why not go and turn Italy upside down as a sign of retaliation ?

And why do French not go to Berlin and turn the city into a havoc in the memory of the numerous wars between France and Germany ?

Stop with that stupid argument about how they deserve now it because of the actions of an elistit minority more than a century ago : Most brits were farmers or minors at that time not some military strategists planning to take over Africa or Asia.

Love how you people are showing your true colors as soon as people and things don't go your way and it's not really pretty...

If there's one thing that Trump does right it's showing how the so-called modern, progressist,democrats people can turn into the most vile, hating,violent and intolerant people in the blink of an eye.
Ah.
 

Ashes

Banned
Ft Lombard column pretty grim outlook. Some sour faces in London. This isn't salt. It's genuine concern.
Three quarters of Europe's securities business is set to go from London over the next couple of years.

Just to add balance. It's not all bad of course. Private equity business might find opportunities - bargains.
 

hawk2025

Member
There is a danger of tit for tat revenge here, can you imagine countries start boycotting others products because of all this spite and anger. I cannot see this ending well.


Oooohh, man.

You really, really don't understand what is going on here. This won't be about revenge. It's about sending a simple, strong signal.

It's not about spite, and it's not about anger. It's pure and simply about the long-run equilibrium of how the negotiation and bargaining games are played.


Think about the incentives here. Think about what's best for the EU, and what their best move is.


Taking a harsh stance with the UK won't be good for the EU.
We buy a lot of stuff off them.

I suppose it might help the bruised ego of the petty Remainers for a few days.
What is it about authoritarian lefties that they always have to punish everyone that doesn't agree with them?

Many people are speaking about punishment in a strictly game-theoretic sense.

A punishment phase is completely rational and consistent with achieving the best outcome. The UK deviated, they get the stick.
 
They should if setting an example is the paramount goal, but I think people are making this a 1-sided affair where the EU has all the leverage and that isn't really true. The UK is still a major economy, a net importer of EU goods, 1/2 of the EU's security council votes, etc.

I think the EU is more than willing to take the hit if that means keeping the EU alive.
 

Bold One

Member
Unless people have already started chasing you up the street threatening to throw you out I think you are being a bit knee-jerky and silly.
I'm sure both of you will find your friends will still be your friends and I'm sure your colleagues will still work with you.

Can you see the irony of calling a whole nation closed minded twats?

I can understand how he is feeling, and how majority of foreigners in this country must be feeling. The current mood and the message from the result is that they are not welcomed here. Put on the news, see what the vox-pop Leave leaning punters are saying.

His anxiety is very well justified and believe you me, an emboldened extreme right will see it as an opportunity.
 

2San

Member
Taking a harsh stance with the UK won't be good for the EU.
We buy a lot of stuff of them.

I suppose it might help the bruised ego of the petty Remainers for a few days.
What is it about authoritarian lefties that they always have to punish everyone that doesn't agree with them?
UK doesn't really offer stuff we can't find else where in the EU though. Especially considering the UK's economy is based on services. That we can't export to them is what hurts us.
 

KooopaKid

Banned
not-this-shit-again_fb_1224286.jpg


The French had a referendum in 2004 for the constitution,
they voted against.
in 2007, presidential election and they voted in favor of a guy who was very clear in passing Lisbon treaty if elected.
French people still voted for him so clearly they didn't want the constitution but wanted the treaty.
take the L and move on Melenchon.

Please stop with this false argument. You think the opposite candidate, Ségolène Royal, was against signing the treaty?
In an interview from Liberation from October 2007 she said:
"vaut mieux un compromis plutôt que rien. L’intégration de la Charte européenne des droits fondamentaux est une avancée très importante. C’est pourquoi nous devons faire bloc avec les socialistes portugais, espagnols, allemands et les autres, et adopter ce texte au plus vite pour passer à l’étape suivante : la préparation du traité social. La question de la procédure d’adoption, parlementaire ou référendaire, n’est plus une question de principe. Nous n’avons pas de temps à perdre à nous diviser. »

http://tempsreel.nouvelobs.com/politique/20071022.OBS0881/segolene-royal-n-est-pas-en-hibernation.html

Both main candidates were/are pro-EU.
 

oti

Banned
2017 is an election year and the CDU has a problem with being seen as "soft". I expect unusual harshness to appease the Protestwähler.

This is international diplomacy. Rhetoric and action are the same thing. If they want to stem the tide, it's not enough to talk about how bad the deal is going to be. They need to actually offer you a really bad deal.

Yeah, it'll be a "Drahtseilakt" for sure. Can't be too nice (why even bother staying in the EU then?) but not too harsh (don't want to be seen as baddies and forces like Russia using this to their advantage, even more than they already do). Interesting times.
 
I just love how apparently every single person who voted leave are small minded, racist, sexist idiots.

Added on with the idea that because ~53% of the U.K. voted to leave this also means 53% of the country hate people from other nationalities, which has to be true because, well, we took part in a democracy.

It's hilarious.

So now people are calling you sexist too, huh?

The vast majority of people here are arguing that the leave side has a large part of it which is xenophobic. This is demonstrably factual. If you need proof, it's been posted and reposted over the course of the last 100 pages.
 

kiguel182

Member
Taking a harsh stance with the UK won't be good for the EU.
We buy a lot of stuff off them.

I suppose it might help the bruised ego of the petty Remainers for a few days.
What is it about authoritarian lefties that they always have to punish everyone that doesn't agree with them?

You mean the 9 per cent you import vs the 57 per cent you export? Guess who has the leverage here?

The EU has no reason to offer a good deal.
 

Mael

Member
I think the EU is more than willing to take the hit if that means keeping the EU alive.

Considering the sacrifice the member states had to do to make the € survive they won't look back if they have to cut the uncooperative British out of the equation.
Grave miscalculation if they thought otherwise.
 
Taking a harsh stance with the UK won't be good for the EU.
We buy a lot of stuff off them.

I suppose it might help the bruised ego of the petty Remainers for a few days.
What is it about authoritarian lefties that they always have to punish everyone that doesn't agree with them?

It's not about you. You left us. Now it's us protecting ourselves. From short sighted people like you (assuming you voted leave).

Although I'm pretty sure the EU will find a way to fuck up this too.
 
A friends Spanish girlfriend got shouted at today. "Go home" they said. Whoever it was, probably Cycloprocks, that thought it was a joke that I thought this was going to be a horrible thing to explain to my kids - fuck you. Fuck you. This is why this result is fucking horrible. We have emboldened a bunch of horrible cunts for literally zero benefit.
 
Taking a harsh stance with the UK won't be good for the EU.
We buy a lot of stuff off them.

I suppose it might help the bruised ego of the petty Remainers for a few days.
What is it about authoritarian lefties that they always have to punish everyone that doesn't agree with them?

You just willingly backed yourselves into a negotiating position where you don't have leverage. You will be operating under extreme time constraints and your opponent has a vested interest in hurting you. You have no clear leadership and your country is hopelessly fractured on the issue.

It's not about bruised egos, it's your new reality. Good luck!
 

Blader

Member
I just love how apparently every single person who voted leave are small minded, racist, sexist idiots.

Added on with the idea that because ~53% of the U.K. voted to leave this also means 53% of the country hate people from other nationalities, which has to be true because, well, we took part in a democracy.

It's hilarious.

We've already seen polls today that put multiculturalism and immigration at the top of the list of Leave voters' grievances. Not everyone who voted Leave did so out of xenophobic or anti-immigrant sentiment. But clearly very many of them did. And that's the movement that a Leave vote permanently associates you with, whether that was the reason for your vote or not.

Like, not everyone who votes for Trump is a racist, xenophobe either. But, their support is forever associated with a racist, xenophobic candidate. No amount of mental gymnastics can untangle that.
 
What about the people who have been interviewed who don't regret it and have put forward arguments that don't involve immigration or migrants. Im watching BBC news right this very moment and they did a piece on county Durham where the people seemed to be level headed about their reasons for voting to leave.

Why do I not see stories like that posted here? Doesn't fit the narrative?
Why don't you do like everyone else here and post the level-headed Leave arguments?
 

Audioboxer

Member
A friends Spanish girlfriend got shouted at today. "Go home" they said. Whoever it was, probably Cycloprocks, that thought it was a joke that I thought this was going to be a horrible thing to explain to my kids - fuck you. Fuck you. This is why this result is fucking horrible. We have emboldened a bunch of horrible cunts for literally zero benefit.

And the horrible cunts you speak of feel emboldened by the fact it appears the majority agree with them. I say appears because no it is not fair to say everyone voting leave is a bigot. It simply isn't. Even if a fair few are. It's the perception that helps and enables those that are though. They'll be taking this a mental win that the majority of the country thinks fuck foreigners and brown skinned people.

Sorry this happened to someone you know.
 

Gen X

Trust no one. Eat steaks.
I highly doubt this voting is real. Although tbh I really don't see what the problem is with leaving the EU. Maybe England should focus on their own problems first like the shitty health system, the housing crisis and pissing benefit money on foreigners. Never mind that there are so many foreigners working for a pittance of the cost. Also, get all that tax owed from the likes of Starbucks, Google, Cameron etc.

England lost its identity decades ago. The great British Empire is a shadow of its former self.
 
Well, yes, the "crackpots" who are responsible for the US having terrible gun laws would be mad if a British leader encouraged the US to do what Obama and many other sensible Americans have been advocating for. I am not sure this is a great comparison for you to be making. Sure, maybe it was bad politics, but if it was bad politics it was bad politics because the people who responded poorly to Obama's statement are irrational crackpots. I guess he should have realized that, but surely if we accept this it reflects even more poorly on the irrational crackpots than on the person who did not realize the depths of crackpottery he was dealing with.

He must have been very poorly advised. Pretty much everyone that I spoke to were of the opinion "Who the fuck is this guy to threaten us". That combined with Osborne threatening to tax the arsehole off of everyone probably tipped quite a few on-the-fencers towards leave. Lets not forget, as recently as last week, there was a 4 ish point gap but 10 percent undecided. You're playing with fire when theres that many undecided people looking for a reason to vote one way or the other.
 
It's not a harsh stance to harm the UK. It's a harsh stance to protect the EU.
It won't be protecting the EU if we stop buying German cars and French wine because the EU behave like the Remainers (sulky and pissy).

It's in the best interests of both parties to remain cordial for business.

People are voting against the EU having so much reach into our laws etc.
They aren't saying they hate the French and the Germans and won't buy any more of their products.
 
Do the Brexiters have a limit to the financial damage they Will tolerate?

I don't think you can overestimate the unthinking nature of a large portion of the populace. I've said it before, but this thing will be essentially forgotten by the vast majority of voters in a month's time. To think that they'll keep up with this to the degree that they'll be aware of the damage it might potentially be doing to their economy is something I personally don't believe in.

It won't be protecting the EU if we stop buying German cars and French wine because the EU behave like the Remainers (sulky and pissy).

It's in the best interests of both parties to remain cordial for business.

People are voting against the EU having so much reach into our laws etc.
They aren't saying they hate the French and the Germans and won't buy any more of their products.

The EU won't be petty, and try to hurt the UK to a ridiculous degree. But if you're even entertaining the notion that the UK will come out of the negotiations in a beneficial position, you're kidding yourself. The EU is a bloc of 27 countries, the second largest economy in the world. The benefit will lay in the EU's camp by the end of all of this.
 

hawk2025

Member
You just willingly backed yourselves into a negotiating position where you don't have leverage. You will be operating under extreme time constraints and your opponent has a vested interest in hurting you. You have no clear leadership and your country is hopelessly fractured on the issue.

It's not about bruised egos, it's your new reality. Good luck!

Seriously, it isn't the emotional response here to think that the UK will be punished and get bad deals.

It's not vindictive. It's cold, rational logic.


It won't be protecting the EU if we stop buying German cars and French wine because the EU behave like the Remainers (sulky and pissy).

It's in the best interests of both parties to remain cordial for business.


People are voting against the EU having so much reach into our laws etc.
They aren't saying they hate the French and the Germans and won't buy any more of their products.

Wrong, wrong, wrong, and wrong.

Again, look up punishment phases in dynamic equilibria.

Wrong.


The UK will be punished, and it will be the rational thing to do.

Every expert said this for months. Don't pretend it's news or a pissy reaction that is suddenly a surprise TODAY.
 

samn

Member
David Allen Green, who writes about law for the Financial Times, wrote this interesting article that might give some hope

https://next.ft.com/content/3073daed-7458-38ed-826b-5b6d1dc81dad

It would appear that no UK politician, including those who headed the Leave campaign, is in any rush to press the “red button” of the Article 50 notification. The now departing Prime Minister David Cameron says it is up to a successor. One likely successor, Boris Johnson, says there is no haste. The red button will be positioned behind a locked door in Downing Street with a protective case placed on top. It is not going to get pressed by accident, if it is ever going to get used.

And what will happen without the button being pressed may be a political phoney war. It may well be that nothing happens at all: that the referendum result just hangs there, and things carry on an institutional and supranational basis much as before.

And there are events which could make it plausible that the notification button is never pressed. A second referendum — so the UK can vote the “right way” — may take place, after some new “deal”. Or the European Union may itself fall apart, as other Member States jostle for position, or even manoeuvre for their own or others’ departure.

The referendum result was of immense political importance, but there was no framework for the Leave result to have any direct knock-on effects. So there is now a period of waiting, where the various actors involved face off and try ever so hard not to blink.

His tweets:

If the Article 50 was not sent today, the day after the Leave result, there is a strong chance it will never be sent.

In my view, the only realistic chance of actual Brexit was if the Article 50 notification was sent immediately on a Leave result.

Most significant political event today was something which did not happen.
No Article 50 notification.
And now less likely every day.

https://twitter.com/DavidAllenGreen
 

Mael

Member
Please stop with this false argument. You think the opposite candidate, Ségolène Royal, was against signing the treaty?
In an interview from Liberation from October 2007 she said:
"vaut mieux un compromis plutôt que rien. L’intégration de la Charte européenne des droits fondamentaux est une avancée très importante. C’est pourquoi nous devons faire bloc avec les socialistes portugais, espagnols, allemands et les autres, et adopter ce texte au plus vite pour passer à l’étape suivante : la préparation du traité social. La question de la procédure d’adoption, parlementaire ou référendaire, n’est plus une question de principe. Nous n’avons pas de temps à perdre à nous diviser. »

http://tempsreel.nouvelobs.com/politique/20071022.OBS0881/segolene-royal-n-est-pas-en-hibernation.html

Both main candidates were/are pro-EU.

Which is exactly my point.
the French population DID NOT care.
More than 31% of the voting population didn't even bother going to vote for that dumb referendum.
All the leading parties went into the next election without giving a shit about the result (and publicly shat on the result too) AND weren't punished by the voting base.
If the referendum was THAT important the 2 leading candidates would have been crushed like Jospin was 5 years before.
That didn't happen, french people voted for candidates who would go against the result knowingly.
Take the L and move on Melenchon.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom