Someone asked for it: the shareholders.
Why even bother with this, why not giving fans what they want. I just don’t get it.
I actually thought it looked pretty fun. Overwatch has shown us that no one has any interest in pursuing the objective, they just want to kill people. Well... This game has a concrete benefit to actually doing that. It causes push. This is just Dota 2 and TF2's baby. I'm here for it.
Edit: If I had one complaint, the heroes looked pretty spongy. Or at least, the character in the video was especially low DPS perhaps. Seemed to struggle really bad to make any kills. But even then, it's not worth getting huffy about HP/Damage values at this point in development because everything is in such aggressive flux.
Seeing the quality of the devs they have with this game … maybe it’s better off not releasing. Half life 3 game that will shit on its legacy.Another generic hero shooter, great
Build Half Life 3 you bitches
I don't disagree. I would be completely content with a solo mode in these sort of games tbh. Fill the rest of the slots with bots for all I care. Other players are the worst aspect of multiplayer games.I played alot of league and dota. 2 there are alot of people out there who only care about them making kills. And those people are the worst to flame their team if they lose.
Personally, I don't want studios to make games for the fans. I want them to make the games they want to make, and if the fans like it, that's icing on the cake.Why even bother with this, why not giving fans what they want. I just don’t get it.
This isn't a Hero Shooter. This is a MOBA. So it's closest competition would be SMITE 2 (on console) and SMITE 2, Leage, Dota, and Heroes of the Storm on PC.This game is getting a lot of shit online. I'm not into many online MP games anymore, but observing this from the outside this looks no more appealing than Overwatch 2 or Concord. This is from the develop of Half Life, Portal, L4D, Counter Strike and TF2, and judging from those standards from the outside, and without playing it, the game looks bland.
- I'd personally rather play this than any MOBA or Hero Shooter on the market (console).i wonder what Men_in_Boxes opinion on this is
"Devs should have the freedom to make the kind of games they want"
Also
"Fuck devs for not making the kind of game I like!"
I think I would play a game made by Jesus. The guy could walk on water and turn water into wine after all. Surely his games would be the most innovative of all. I bet Jesus could make a pc/console that did not even require any electricity or any form of power to run. That would be neat.Jesus christ could come down to earth and make a hero shooter himself and I still wouldn't play it.
Sorry Gabe.
That's the catch 22. It's good that Valve has the freedom to do what they want, and they are not bound by shareholders. I might not like the game the make, but I don't have to play it either. But I would rather choose to skip a game then the company forced to make crap because they have to please shareholders. Valve can easily survive a bad game made internally and that's what counts. And in the end, they have no one to blame but themselves and one would hope, self-reflect on what went wrong. They had that card game that failed miserably from what I recall. This might be failure number 2 I suppose.Personally, I don't want studios to make games for the fans. I want them to make the games they want to make, and if the fans like it, that's icing on the cake.
Most studios obviously can't afford to do that, but Valve can, and that's a good thing.
You give Concord a chance but you bury Deadlock?Absolute trash
Can't wait to hear everyone's disgust about yet another metroidvania when Silksong comes out.Too true.
"Not another MOBA! There's already like 8 of them!"
Also
"OMG the 497th platformer! This looks adorable!"
Can't wait to hear everyone's disgust about yet another metroidvania when Silksong comes out.
Metroidvanias are cool. Hero shooters are not.Can't wait to hear everyone's disgust about yet another metroidvania when Silksong comes out.
I 100% think this can be a hit and still think the GAAS market is saturated tho.- I'd personally rather play this than any MOBA or Hero Shooter on the market (console).
- MOBA's are objectively better than Hero Shooters.
- NeoGAFs takes on this are extremely predictable.
- Hi-Rez (Smite 2) Studios should be worried. This looks waaaaay better in my opinion.
- Railway system is an interesting admittance to the 3rd person MOBA problem of map traversal.
- This is still an "old style multiplayer" game. I'm much more interested in the open world, small team size games (Arc Raiders, Marathon).
- This will certainly be a success. The saturated market people will cry.
Well duh. All evidence that goes against the theory must be thrown out. I would expect nothing less, lol.I 100% think this can be a hit and still think the GAAS market is saturated tho.
MOBAs suck dick and so do platformers.Too true.
"Not another MOBA! There's already like 8 of them!"
Also
"OMG the 497th platformer! This looks adorable!"
What shareholders?Someone asked for it: the shareholders.
You give Concord a chance but you bury Deadlock?
I have been betrayed.
No? We just don't live in a world of absolutes.Well duh. All evidence that goes against the theory must be thrown out. I would expect nothing less, lol.
It’s been nearly five years since Valve announced a truly new game — and counting. Valve has still not announced Deadlock,
its new hero shooter
It's also irrelevant when you're coming at it like ____ game shouldn't exist because there are others while selectively picking genres based on your own personal tastes.Metroidvanias are cool. Hero shooters are not.
What’s there to no understand?
ok, unpopular opinion, i think this will do better than people think.
I thought it was going to be some overwatch clone but seeing gameplay they're clearly leaning more into MOBAs and adding some Team Fortress into the mix. There is definitely an untapped public for this.
?Valve still makes games? Holy shit.