Salaadin said:
Different reviewers.
The guy who reviewed TW2 says this in the comments:
It's much better yet he would have scored da2 pretty much the same. (I enjoyed origins despite it's flaws and repetitiveness but da2 was awful in almost every single way)
Also calling the first game a 7/10- at the same time is a joke.
I'm not going fanboy over tw2 here, couldn't care less if they score it a 6, as long as they are consistent and have good arguments.
A difficult to learn (but satisfying once you get the hang of it) first game with a more complicated and less hold your hand story is apparently over their empty little heads.
A little taste of this guy's other well written gems.
http://www.pcgamer.com/2011/02/05/saturday-crapshoot-microshaft-winblows-98/
Other than that this guy has never been allowed to actually review anything it seems.
He just gets to write something about obscure old games noone ever heard of, busywork.
Again, I'm annoyed at what passes for gaming journalism in general, not the score some game I like gets.