They just saw what happened to Dodd and Biden and know they could be nextJohnTinker said:Is the air conditioning broken or something?
Everyone looks ridiculously sweaty
Newt Gingrich poised the idea of having a 90 minute sit-down debate between the two Presidential candidates every week in order to fully and properly answer questions. Nearly impossible to do now with the field so wide, but once the nominations are done I would love to see it become reality.Stoney Mason said:You can't answer anything in 30 seconds with any substance. They should just keep the same format and answer a lot fewer questions. I don't think most people would have a problem with that. Debate should have been two hours also instead of 90 mintues.
I buy all of my stuff on Amazon, so I'm all for it!Triumph Dolomite 1300cc said:I love Gravel and everything, but a retail sales tax ****s over the poor way more than it does the rich.
Amazon sells groceries now?npm0925 said:I buy all of my stuff on Amazon, so I'm all for it!
JohnTinker said:Newt Gingrich poised the idea of having a 90 minute sit-down debate between the two Presidential candidates every week in order to fully and properly answer questions. Nearly impossible to do now with the field so wide, but once the nominations are done I would love to see it become reality.
JohnTinker said:Amazon sells groceries now?
That would be wonderfulJohnTinker said:Newt Gingrich poised the idea of having a 90 minute sit-down debate between the two Presidential candidates every week in order to fully and properly answer questions. Nearly impossible to do now with the field so wide, but once the nominations are done I would love to see it become reality.
Yup.JohnTinker said:Amazon sells groceries now?
Yeah, thats essentially what he said when expounding it. There'd be a theme to all the questions per week. Examples he used were one week for foreign policies, one week for tax and fiscal related issues, another week for moral issues, etc. I'm so sick and tired of 20-second sound bites in order to find out someone's stances.Stoney Mason said:I like that every candidate gets to answer questions here. The mods can't tilt the debate how they see fit. Of course with that format you aren't going to have to breath of questions but that's why you schedule a lot of debates and have them themed.
I'm glad I can buy candy but when I can buy eggs and milk and other perishables tax-free at a competitive price let me knownpm0925 said:
Stoney Mason said:The debate is mainly geared toward African Amerian issues. That's the focus.
npm0925 said:The guy sitting next to Sharpton. He's buddies with Hugo Chavez, right?
JohnTinker said:Bill Richardson talks slower than my neighbor with Alzheimers
He read his polling numbers?Stoney Mason said:I think he took some downers tonight.
JohnTinker said:Gravel did not directly attack outsourcing -2 from the base
Oh I'm sure theres a blog out there somewhere comparing "the plight of the Palestinians to the plight of the black man" and I've seen crazierRipclawe said:federal law to make sure United Nations right to return for New Orleans? How did the Palestinians get mixed up in this?
siamesedreamer said:I don't think there's anyway to say who helped themselves. It just looked like one nine-headed candidate up on stage. IMO, it was an utter waste of time. The REPs should seriously reconsider their scheduled PBS debate in September.
And you should!Mii said:Clinton gained my (temporary) support among Democrats.
I feel sick.
Humphrey Bogart said:would anyone mind letting me know what Gravel's last comment was? i didn't get to hear it due to random noise in the house.
Humphrey Bogart said:would anyone mind letting me know what Gravel's last comment was? i didn't get to hear it due to random noise in the house.
"Very simply. If we have a president, he has to have moral judgment. Most of the people on this stage with me do not have that judgment and have proven it by the simple fact of what they've done."