That's all interesting stuff, but random acts of gangrape or murder across the globe are not being commanded under threat of an authority figure, and the discussion was in regards to whether such aberrant behavior could be considered "normal" for humans to engage in.Mortrialus said:Perhaps, but you will be surprised how far most people will go when the right psychological buttons are pushed, particularly with authority figures. Do I need to remind you of the Milgram Experiment and the Stanford Prison Experiment .
Cold blood? Perhaps not. But if the Milgram Experiment is anything to go by, about 60 percent of people can be expected to do kill another under the command of authority figures.
If society deems something unacceptable like murder or rape, and the incidents of such are continually denounced and perpetrators punished, then I think it is fair to say they fall outside of the "normal" behavior of most humans. That point was only made because abnormal acts like rape and murder are so offensive to people that a common reaction is to call for blood or to label the perpetrators as something subhuman or as a "monster".Mortrialus said:With human behavior and psychology, there is always going to be some levels of variation in every one, and collectively in almost every factor. That is how biology works and psychology as well. There are social norms, but I think its better to refer to things as natural verses socially acceptable. Abominable behavior like gang rape is a minority likely because the society as a whole as deemed it unacceptable. Humans are a hierarchical species. We are biologically disposed to following authority and I think you gravely underestimate how easily people can go when under the influence of an authority figure, which is, unfortunately, natural and frighteningly common.
Your repeated references to an authority commanding rape and murder are out of place in a discussion involving a random act by people who are acting under no such threat.