they're competently made and make money, sure. I just think calling Marvel's weaker movies very good, and comparing them to Pixar's early output, is being way too generous.
not really. Why would you only compare marvel's WEAKER output to Pixar's early catalogue, while ignoring the successes?
Marvel is 10 films in. Those ten films are:
Iron Man
Incredible Hulk
Iron Man 2
Thor
Captain America: First Avenger
Avengers
Iron Man 3
Thor: The Dark World
Captain America: Winter Soldier
Guardians of the Galaxy
Pixar's first 10 films were:
Toy Story
A Bug's Life
Toy Story 2
Monster's Inc
Finding Nemo
The Incredibles
Cars
Ratatouille
Wall-E
Up
Between the two, there's not a ton of daylight. Neither have ANY bad films in that ten film stretch, and even the weakest (Hulk and Thor 2 for marvel, Cars for pixar) are still pretty well received. On the high end, Winter Soldier, Avengers, Iron Man, and Guardians of the Galaxy have universal acclaim and scores in the mid to high 90s, and no one can really argue that Avengers has changed the way people are making movies- the "connected universe" concept has since spread to Fox, Warner, and Sony since launch.
I'm not going to argue which is better, but I think there's a good chance there will be some comparison further down the line.
It's okay. Thor 2 is aggressively bad though
Dark Elves don't have faces. They wear helmets that look like faces.
??
they don't?