Ok so I went back and reread the beginning of our conversation and I think I understand where we have misunderstood each other.
This part I completely agree with and I wasn't clear enough that it wasn't what I was objecting to. It's also strongly supported by the data, as you brought up.
This is the part I disagreed with. If the okc data is to be believed, male beauty standards are out of whack
and also women aren't as affected by this when choosing a match (thank god for that or our species would be done for
). My initial understanding of the situation was that no matter what the reason, women must be very unhappy currently with the attractiveness of the average man. According to the data they clearly have an expectation of him to look
much better than he currently does. Men on the other hand are
aware that they are competing for a small subset of the female population and although this behavior is shameful and degrading to the remaining women it isn't based on a false expectation of beauty but rather on a desire to compete. That was the point of origin of my initial reply.
Now, thinking about it further there are more ways to interprate this huge disparity besides "women have unrealistic expectations". For example another valid interpretation is "women hold men to the same standard of beauty that society has (unfairly) held women", in which case it would be reasonably accurate to say that most men are below average. That may be what's going on but we'd need additional data to say so.