And following on from that, I'd treat anyone who put an exclusion based on height the same as I'd treat someone who put an exclusion based on race. It's one thing to have a preference but another to use it as a primary criterion for choosing a partner.
I'm not familiar with dating sites, but these kinds of exclusions just seem distasteful in the same way people would think of a guy who wrote "Don't message me unless you're DD or bigger" in his profile.
I think most people looking for a traditional, multi-faceted relationship would be justified in saying that person is probably short-sighted about the variety of experiences that come with a relationship as well as unnecessarily limiting toward his success, but if that person's sole motivation for interacting with another human is to play with
tig ol' bitties, we'd have to shrug our shoulders and say that's fine and good luck. Height might be similarly exclusive, but that's honestly okay if it's that important to someone. It's rather
unfortunate when race plays in the same way, and we're all free to judge that person for their criteria, but I don't suppose there's anything
wrong about it in itself.
Calling exclusions "distasteful" just sounds bitter and dejected. Not everyone is looking for the same thing in a relationship. It doesn't matter how nurturing, entertaining, or whatever you are if it's not important enough to the person you're trying to impress. You're better off not worrying about it and focusing on people who
are looking for what you provide.
I'm just pointing out a double standard.
Where is the double standard? It seems to me that humans universally select sexual partners in accordance with their preferences when given a choice.