I can't speak for him, and personally, skin tone is basically irrelevant to me, but I can see it being a preference without making one racist. And of course there are exceptions, but when a preference, or set of preferences, would mean you are not attracted to, say, 95% of an ethnic/racial group, does that make you racist? Is it only racism if it's 100%? I just don't get it.
I mean look at this:
What if instead, this post said:
"I don't find black men attractive at all for the most part. They generally don't have the features I find attractive. But there's rare exceptions of course."
Racist? Not racist? Diet racist? Which is it? I vote "not racist", but based on what this thread has been telling me, it's absolutely racist. Go figure.
And I imagine someone who doesn't care for dark skin tones wouldn't be attracted to Hulk Hogan either. Not sure what your point is (if there was one beyond just a joke at Hulk Hogan's expense, that is xD).
Why is this so hard to believe?
I don't find women attractive. There are billions of them.
I don't find bald and short-haired men attractive*. There are probably billions of them too.
I must be bigoted against women (lol) and short-haired men or something...
* (A few very rare exception do exist on the short-haired ones, but they are indeed exceedingly rare. )
Well I've never seen a woman I found attractive. I can find them beautiful, or pretty, or whatever, and sometimes I am even in awe at how pretty they are, but I'm still not attracted to them and certainly would never date them nor have sex with them. So I really don't get your point...