Highway test for me today at Vic Park. Wish me luck, TO Gaf.
Good luck.
Highway test for me today at Vic Park. Wish me luck, TO Gaf.
Highway test for me today at Vic Park. Wish me luck, TO Gaf.
Yup. Didn't do well on my last lesson. Strange since before that I was perfectly fine. Just want to get this done and over with.Good luck, is this your first attempt?
They should remove Ford to set a strong precedent that conflict of interest is a serious issue. Too many politicians are wrapped up in conflict of interest issues to be looking out for the people.
I will be absolutely floored if hes removed. City of Toronto will not make this decision. Federal cases are usually used to set precedent. The backlash at all governmental levels would be huge. It would destroy the judges career, and most involved. Remember, we have a majority Conservative government. Payback will happen.
As much as the vast majority would like to see this happen, it wont.
Ignorance is not a defense.
Ignorance is not a defense. Really interested to see how this ends up.
What do you mean I have to stop for streetcar doors. I'm a busy man!
My favourite part.Jeeze, he doesn't even understand what the basic concept of "conflict of interest" is. He keeps insisting it's only a conflict of interest if it benefits him and the city.
It feels uncomfortable in the courtroom. The mayor does not seem to understand many of the questions
He doesn't understand that using a business card that says he's the Mayor and includes a city logo is exactly the same as using city letterhead.Ruby asks if good idea to use that card given integrity commissioner criticism of him in 2010 about using city letterhead. "I've never been told I can't use my business card ... I'm not sure what other card I'd use"
I love it,
He doesn't understand that using a business card that says he's the Mayor and includes a city logo is exactly the same as using city letterhead.
Yup. Didn't do well on my last lesson. Strange since before that I was perfectly fine. Just want to get this done and over with.
Also failed G1 first time. Really sends on the tester...
Ford being asked why he didn't respond to letters from the city's integrity commissioner about use of city resources to solicit funds and soliciting donations from people lobbying him on city business.
Ford is struggling to remember details of a meeting he eventually had with integrity commissioner Janet Leiper.
Where are you guys getting that news feed from?
You can also use this page.Where are you guys getting that news feed from?
Where are you guys getting that news feed from?
I'm using Twitter.
The evidence and his testimony is pretty damning. With all of this going public via twitter it's going to look really bad if they just give him a slap on the wrist.
Ruby asking Mayor Ford why he ignored a warning at 2010 vote, from then-speaker Sandra Bussin, that he might have been in conflict if he voted. " A lot of it could have been politically motivated in my eyes," Ford said, noting he and Bussin didn't "see eye to eye" on many issues.
"Reckless to ignore" speaker, Ruby asks. Ford says he doesn't want to get into his relationship with the previous speaker. Says Bussin used to cut off his mic.
If the judge finds that he broke the rules then he's automatically removed from office
If the judge finds that he broke the rules then he's automatically removed from office
The outcome: The judge can find Ford: not guilty, guilty of conflict of interest through inadvertence or an error in judgment; or guilty of knowingly breaching the Act. If the judge finds the latter, he has no option but to order that Ford be removed from office, and discretion only on whether to bar him from running for elected office for up to seven years. If Ford is removed from office, the city could either call a mayoral byelection or appoint a replacement from city council ranks.
Ford is bitter.
The judge can find Ford: not guilty, guilty of conflict of interest through inadvertence or an error in judgment; or guilty of knowingly breaching the Act. If the judge finds the latter, he has no option but to order that Ford be removed from office
guess which one it will be.
It really doesn't seem like he was prepped for this at all. He just sounds like an idiot giving excuses the way a child would for not handing in their homework.
It really doesn't seem like he was prepped for this at all. He just sounds like an idiot giving excuses the way a child would for not handing in their homework.
Not a real surprise if you watch council meetings. Or any public speaking event that isn't heavily scripted with a majority of Ford-supporters in the crowd. He has a very tough time with his words under pressure. Still amazing that he was elected, but it was a laughable pool of candidates.
There are really two sides to the 'guilty' verdict, according to the report. If he's guilty through inadvertence, or error in judgement he can stay in office. If he knowingly breached the act, he's tossed no questions asked. It's really why the prosecution is pushing the point that he was presented with the facts about what he was doing, but he made the decision to ignore them.
No, the judge can do anything from a slap on the wrist up to removal from office with a 7 year ban from running for office again. Same thing happened to Hazel in Mississauga in the early '80's and she just got a slap on the wrist.If the judge finds that he broke the rules then he's automatically removed from office
It will be inadvertence. Everyone knows he broke the rules, so they cant skirt that. They want to set some type of an example without plunging council into chaos.
The political shit storm of tossing him, is too great.
But looking at this testimony Ford knew what he was doing and was informed multiple times what he was doing was wrong. With all of this public via twitter/the star it's going to look really bad if the verdict comes back guilty through inadvertence.
I can see it happening though.
I already agreed with you further up. I was just pointing out what the idea is behind drilling home the fact that he knew what he was doing.
No, the judge can do anything from a slap on the wrist up to removal from office with a 7 year ban from running for office again. Same thing happened to Hazel in Mississauga in the early '80's and she just got a slap on the wrist.
Woodbine is the lone company among the 11 donors who were to get their money back. The race track operator is in north Etobicoke, near his previous ward.
Look at the bigger picture. This isnt just local politics anymore. A guilty verdict would change the dynamic across the country. If Toronto can toss their mayor, why cant we. This will set off a huge chain reaction.
Also take into account that he is tight with both Harper and Hudak. They will also have something to say about this on Federal and Provincial levels. Politics is a very, very dirty game, and there will be great consequences.
Ford: "If I had known I would be here today I would have declared a conflict."
You're absolutely right on all accounts too.
I'd love to see it go the other way though. The political shit storm alone would be a joy to watch.
Harper might be able to complain about Ford getting booted for corruption but Hudak is already on thin ice
It would most likely be Doug Holyday since he's the Deputy Mayor but we won't find out because Ford isn't losing his job.I think council wise, we would be ok. Nobody likes the guy, and the minority that does would fall in line, for fear of the same treatment. Who would the next mayor be? We voted in this creamy centered wingnut, who says they wont just slap his equally retarded brother in?
I think council wise, we would be ok. Nobody likes the guy, and the minority that does would fall in line, for fear of the same treatment. Who would the next mayor be? We voted in this creamy centered wingnut, who says they wont just slap his equally retarded brother in?
I would be more concerned elsewhere, leaning to the Provincial level. McGuinty's fucked up, and change is coming on that front too.
Lots of this ground was covered in the June 28 deposition and by Ford in media interviews but he appears to have opened up a new front by suggesting the city's integrity commissioner might have illegally recommended council force him to repay the money.