Shanks D Zoro
Banned
fuck
Man, that was a great win by Vuillermoz, and Froome really showed his strength too.
If you look at Tony Martin, Mark Cavendish, Zdenek Stybar, Andre Greipel, Rohan Dennis and Joaquim Rodríguez you're seeing healthy people. I don't have that impression if I look at Froome.
If you get at levels that people are wondering if it is liveable, than there is a problem. If you get at levels where your food is a specialized liquid that costs 2700, than you have problem.
I know, but it shows it has nothing to do with cyclists. It is with this specific group trying to win the Tour.Yeah, you're comparing a climber with sprinters, time triallists and classics riders, of course they will look different.
The Pantani, Ullrich generation didn't look like that. Even Nibali and Contador didn't look this extreme the years they won.Cyclists who want to perform in the mountains have been starving themselves for ever, that's nothing new. Riis used to ride long rides with almost only water and then take sleeping pills when he came back to prevent himself from eating. Rasmussen looked like a ghost and french coaches prevented their riders from eating.
Yes, your fat percentage is related to your overal weight and your height. Just like a model of 2m at 50 kg is a lot different from a 1m60 girl at 50 kg. Team Sky is amongst the group pushing it down a lot.Quintana is probably at least 10kg lighter, but since he's much shorter, he looks more normal. In the mountain the only number that counts is w/kg
You could apply the same argument to anorexic models, people have different body types. It is only the question how you got there and what it means for your body. Even Sky thought it was unhealthy three years ago. And he is this thin now, he'll lose weight in the Tour like everyone else. 6% body fat is not some sort of thing you achieve by having a different body type, under 5% is considered bad, very bad even for athletes.People have different body shapes and the taller you are, the thinner you will look.
Rasmussen also had help. They also don't need to compete with Lance, Ullrich and Indurain whose predecessors also had higher fat percentage. Merckx was 74 kg at the Tour, Froome who is 1 cm bigger was at 66 kg last month and is still lower now.Easier for lance, ullrich, indurain to climb faster with higher weight when they had plenty of chemicals to help them
yeah, Nibali is in poor form, Contador is struggling from trying to do the double, Quintana is poor as well.
It saddens me to say, but this tour looks like it is Froome's to lose.
Astana train blowing up early in the stage was not a good sign. They got it back together, but I don't think it will be enough to gain anything on BMC or Sky.
That was soo good, Froome is clearly the winner today.
Quintana can smile
That was soo good, Froome is clearly the winner today.
Quintana can smile
You could apply the same argument to anorexic models, people have different body types. It is only the question how you got there and what it means for your body. Even Sky thought it was unhealthy three years ago. And he is this thin now, he'll lose weight in the Tour like everyone else. 6% body fat is not some sort of thing you achieve by having a different body type, under 5% is considered bad, very bad even for athletes.
.
Basso has testicular cancer and is leaving the tour.
Just read this, holy crap. He's 'lucky' for falling in the 5th stage which led to them discovering it now.
Stybar is staying with Etixx for two more years by the way. Just announced today. It's a nail biter whether or not Kwiatkowski will...
Woo! Should be a great stage today. Here's hoping Froome doesn't dominate.
Anyone headed to watch the race in person this year?
Woo! Should be a great stage today. Here's hoping Froome doesn't dominate.
Anyone headed to watch the race in person this year?
I'll be there on the Champs-Elysees after cycling in from London that weekend.Woo! Should be a great stage today. Here's hoping Froome doesn't dominate.
Anyone headed to watch the race in person this year?