I'm just going to cut and paste the text of the complaints I sent to the BBC rather than go over it all, if that's okay.
In 2010, QI ran an episode with a long and lolarious ladyboys section. I didn't see it at the time but on the repeat earlier this year I caught it, was all WTF DUDE and ranted at the BBC thusly:
My name and email address auto-fill in the BBC complaints page now. It's quite the time saver.
---------------------------------------
Is there really any point to this? I mean, clearly the BBC does not care one bit about being offensive when it comes to transgender people. I'm not going to do any of that false equivalence stuff where I talk about the BBC's (hardly perfect) attitude towards other minorities because really.
You know better.
But you don't care.
The extended tittering sequence in QI about "ladyboys" was just revolting. Really? How can I tell if "it's" a boy or a girl? And the final line from Stephen Fry -- "Without undressing them or testing their DNA you can't be certain what sex someone is, so be careful out there!" -- was just disgusting.
Let me put that out on its own.
"Without undressing them or testing their DNA you can't be certain what sex someone is, so be careful out there!"
LOL! Hilarity!
I'm not going to quote death statistics at you. I'm not going to talk about murdered people I've known. I'm not going to talk about the everyday worries of being trans. Because you don't care. You can edit repeats, but you didn't.
We're funny! But we could be hiding anywhere. Watch out!
It came very shortly after some grotesque (in both senses of the word) loltrannies sketch on one of the BBC's sketch shows; hence the "is there any point to this?" tone. At the time I tweeted at Fry but didn't receive a response. I think he was in the US at the time. I let it go.
Fast forward to watching "Would I Lie to You" at the beginning of this month:
I'm not going to waste time writing this out properly since I fully expect to receive a reply containing the phrase, "there's no single set of standards in this area on which the whole of society can agree and it's inevitable that comments which are acceptable to some will occasionally strike others as distasteful," or something similar, to which the only response can be, isn't that part of what being a minority is all about? That people can't agree on whether to treat you with a little respect and decency? And against which I would suggest that the BBC is being cowardly and ignoring its responsibility as an opinion-shaper and broadcaster of some of the UK's most popular entertainment, instead holding a delightful mirror up to playground taunts and broadcasting them without comment or criticism and with a smile. I'm instead going to provide the notes I made as I watched it on iPlayer. Have fun, whoever compiles the audience log!
So Nigel Havers is claiming, "I once went on a date with a flamenco dancer who turned out to be a man." Suspense!
"Ooh, Lee, this is ringing bells for you, isn't it?" How awful yet humorous! Someone ELSE may have gone on a date with a transsexual person. How demeaning!
Following: lots of "apply stereotypical male speech and behaviour to women = trans woman" ugliness. The phrase "no bollock grabbing" is used. Urinal joke.
Naturally, while dancing, her penis brushed up against the man in question. Described by the host as "a harrowing tale for a young lad."
Brooker: "I don't buy that you would be able to ask somebody out and not twig that they were a man."
"What do you think, Nina? You're a woman, after all!" "Hopefully!"
It's TRUE! So this woman Nigel Havers danced with at 16 hopefully will never have to see a panel show full of people who never met her calling her a man, and an entire audience laughing along. Because she's a man! It's so funny! It's not like it's her life or anything! It's not like being recognised as transsexual can be extremely dangerous and even fatal or anything! IT'S JUST A HARMLESS JOKE! BECAUSE SHE'S A MAN!
Cheers, BBC. I'll make sure to know my place and not, you know, accidentally dance with a straight guy or anything. God forbid.
And then in the comments of the entry where I posted that originally (not originally originally, but after I'd sent it to the BBC) someone warned me off that week's QI. Glutton for punishment that I am, off I went.
It was actually reasonably mild, as far as dick jokes about trans women go, but I was already in a mood and tweeted @ Fry to that effect, hoping I might be able to nudge him into thinking, hey, remember how I don't like to see bipolar jokes and Jew jokes? Maybe it's the same kind of thing with tranny jokes!
Nope. Apparently we should learn to laugh at ourselves! To which the obvious response is, yeah, we
do laugh at ourselves, quite a lot. But this was Fry using his national platform to laugh at us, which seems a little out of balance to me. But hey, he did his free speech is my BFF thing, me and other people did our, hey, dude, seriously, wtf thing, and some other unhelpful people joined in calling, variously, Fry and/or me a fucker depending on where in the debate their sensibilities lay. It wound down. Someone called me a coward for not starting a letter campaign; I'm far happier leaving it in the hands of people like Trans Media Watch, who unlike me are not massive dicks.
Since then Trans Media Watch has been occasionally tweeting him asking him to maybe say something nice about trans people, or at least stop with the loltrannies gags, since he is big and we are small. No response so far, afaik.
edit: my opinion on Fry is that he obviously doesn't hate trans people, but he's kind of thoughtless, doesn't seem to think that the opinions of incredibly popular and famous people have any kind of effect on wider society, and seems to think it's fine for him to tell jokes about trans people because he's gay and jewish. Ah well.