I'm actually for open communication among world leaders and don't think we should be beholden to China's perspective on Taiwan, so - without really knowing the potential consequences of this - I'm actually glad for the breach. We need to be talking with everyone.
On the other hand, sometime soon Trump is going to really step in it because of his clear ignorance of international relations, and create a huge mess. (If he hasn't already.)
Diplomacy is a subtle game. In the US, a simple phone call isn't seen as a faux-pas. But did you know that in China, grabbing a woman by the pussy can be considered insulting? It's important to learn of these cultural differences. Mexico accidentally stirred the ire of Trump when they sent an envoy of rapists to the US.
Diplomacy is a subtle game. In the US, a simple phone call isn't seen as a faux-pas. But did you know that in China, grabbing a woman by the pussy can be considered insulting? It's important to learn of these cultural differences. Mexico accidentally stirred the ire of Trump when they sent an envoy of rapists to the US.
Trump just changed what has been US policy since 1979. Whatever your feelings about China's treatment of Taiwan (and mine are strong) it is a radical move for a president-elect who is not yet in office to make.
But did you know that in China, grabbing a woman by the pussy can be considered insulting?
http://crushable.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/did-i-do-that-steve-urkel-family-matters.gif
Oops. There's bound to be a couple mistakes when you're a new employee.
Tensions in Asia are extremely high right now. This is a de-stabilizing opening bid in an already uncertain relationship with China.It's not a radical move, backing democratically elected governments should be the normal move of American governments. Previous governments were the radical ones.
Tensions in Asia are extremely high right now. This is a de-stabilizing opening bid in an already uncertain relationship with China.
Xi Jinping is so unsure of what is the new president is going to do that he's trying to use Henry Kissinger as a go between. This is a tense moment.
Trump just ratcheted up that tension significantly, and did so whilst he is not yet in control of the government, and hasn't even selected a secretary of state.
It IS a radical act, for practical as well as ideological reasons.
Those of us who aren't nostalgic for the height of the cold war would argue that we need to be stronger with China, but not in a way that recklessly creates the kind of panicky uncertainty that terrifies allies and provides fuel for the most anti-American elements in the Chinese government.No, Xi Jinping is the one ramping up tensions, building huge artificial islands on atolls (which has never been recognised as appropriate under international law), ignoring the one country two systems laws agreed between the UK, HK, and China, and directly interfering in HK issues. Cracking right down on personal rights in China. Xi Jinping is the one out of control, and about time that someone stood up to him.
No, Xi Jinping is the one ramping up tensions, building huge artificial islands on atolls (which has never been recognised as appropriate under international law), ignoring the one country two systems laws agreed between the UK, HK, and China, and directly interfering in HK issues. Cracking right down on personal rights in China. Xi Jinping is the one out of control, and about time that someone stood up to him.
There are a lot of areas the US could stand firmer with China on, but I'm not sure what the benefit is of choosing direct official talks with Taiwan as the starting point. Maybe it's good for Trump's business opportunities, but it doesn't serve to do much else beyond antagonize China.No, Xi Jinping is the one ramping up tensions, building huge artificial islands on atolls (which has never been recognised as appropriate under international law), ignoring the one country two systems laws agreed between the UK, HK, and China, and directly interfering in HK issues. Cracking right down on personal rights in China. Xi Jinping is the one out of control, and about time that someone stood up to him.
It's not a radical move, backing democratically elected governments should be the normal move of American governments. Previous governments were the radical ones.
same thoughts for Hong KongOne of the few mistakes hes made I do not mind. Our policy with Taiwan is counterproductive with how China continually attempts to undermine them. Taiwan has always been an ardent ally and they deserve better.
Those of us who aren't nostalgic for the height of the cold war would argue that we need to be stronger with China, but not in a way that recklessly creates the kind of panicky uncertainty that terrifies allies and provides fuel for the most anti-American elements in the Chinese government.
Also, the major point is that international policy is being set by someone who isn't yet in control of the government. This leaves both the US and Chinese governments in a bizarre position of not being able to properly respond to each other. This is a strange kind of limbo that I'm trying to think of a precedent for.
Trump needs to be creating an atmosphere of stability rather than leaving the world to believe he is improvising. He needs to appoint a secretary of state NOW, and clarify his foreign policy stances if he's going to start making moves like this.
No, Xi Jinping is the one ramping up tensions, building huge artificial islands on atolls (which has never been recognised as appropriate under international law), ignoring the one country two systems laws agreed between the UK, HK, and China, and directly interfering in HK issues. Cracking right down on personal rights in China. Xi Jinping is the one out of control, and about time that someone stood up to him.
One of the few mistakes hes made I do not mind. Our policy with Taiwan is counterproductive with how China continually attempts to undermine them. Taiwan has always been an ardent ally and they deserve better.
Many people in this thread celebrating this do NOT understand what the One-China policy is actually about... this is not about recognizing Taiwan as independent state, Taiwan itself overwhelming wants to remain the status quo going forward.. not just full independence, while there is still a strong % who would prefer reunification.
Taiwan's view for many years, and still held by some is that THEY should be the government that rules of Mainland China, and not the PRC over them.
It's a complicated, very complicated dispute.
Trump jumping into this and opening it up, before he takes office is a bad move.
See, this is a very naive understanding of what Taiwan is, and what the history of it is.
Yeah I'm very confused by this. China forbids US presidents from speaking to Taiwan? And we obey? This is bizarre.
http://www.goarmy.com/learn/apply.html
Here you go, buddy! Have fun standing up to the People's Republic of China!
Isn't a big part of Trump's platform Fuck China?
Right a phone call congratulating the president of Taiwan for winning an election is absolutely the same as launching a ground war against China. The left definitely isn't getting ridiculous with their Trump panic at all.
Trump already told China he's going to impose tariffs on trade and scrap climate change deals. At this point China's like "Oh what did he do today? Whatever." and continues with their day.
Right a phone call congratulating the president of Taiwan for winning an election is absolutely the same as launching a ground war against China. The left definitely isn't getting ridiculous with their Trump panic at all.
So your proposal is to escalate tensions with a nuclear power that you need full cooperation from to stabilize a rogue state in the area. Great job being the leader of the free world here.
There are a lot of areas the US could stand firmer with China on, but I'm not sure what the benefit is of choosing direct official talks with Taiwan as the starting point. Maybe it's good for Trump's business opportunities, but it doesn't serve to do much else beyond antagonize China.
Many people in this thread celebrating this do NOT understand what the One-China policy is actually about... this is not about recognizing Taiwan as independent state, Taiwan itself overwhelming wants to remain the status quo going forward.. not just full independence, while there is still a strong % who would prefer reunification.
Taiwan's view for many years, and still held by some is that THEY should be the government that rules of Mainland China, and not the PRC over them.
It's a complicated, very complicated dispute.
Trump jumping into this and opening it up, before he takes office is a bad move.
See, this is a very naive understanding of what Taiwan is, and what the history of it is.
It's not just the left freaking out about this today.
It's hundreds of very smart and established foreign policy officials that have worked in multiple Republican and Democrat Administrations. Sometimes both. These are people with a direct pulse on foriegn policy in the South Pacific since the Nixon administration.
But dont let that get in the way of blaming the left. It's always a good excuse. I look forward to this reasoning for four years as terrible blunders come home to roost.
Oops. There's bound to be a couple mistakes when you're a new employee.
Yeah I'm very confused by this. China forbids US presidents from speaking to Taiwan? And we obey? This is bizarre.
Also, what people do not realize is that the CCP perceives any threat to "One China" doctrine as existential.
They will wildly overreact to this because they have to.
You don't know what you're talking about. There is nothing "expected" about Trump doing something for the first time in 40 years.You do realise that US law is that the US must protect Taiwan by supplying them with arms? China is always pissed at US for supplying Taiwan with missiles, Trump chatting to the Taiwanese President first should be expected.