Sax Russel
Banned
aww SNAP ONE POINT ZERO ONE
Actually, it's way more clear cut then that and is what doctors use in most places where abortion access is not subject to bullshit rules, like in CA. The rest of the argument is non-doctors and scientists arguing semantics ie most pro-lifers. Their ignorance of simple reproductive biology and rejection of empiricism is amazing.
Everyone is out of order!You're out of order! You're out of order!
Thanks. I just tuned in and I noticed that she was no longer talking. :/The Dems are trying to nest as many parliamentary procedures as possible to try to reach midnight.
LOL.
On another note: as a pro-lifer, I love me some limiting of abortions.
Outside of life of mother/baby unable to survive without machines sort of thing.
Definitely a rarity on GAF, I know, but that's me.
(to counterbalance the incoming hate, I am against the death penalty, pro gay-marriage, for legalization of most drugs, etc.)
Why aren't they!Felicia Day ‏@feliciaday 2m
100k people watching this live stream of the TX Legislature now. http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=2Q8Hr0O20LY Are no major news networks covering this?
Is this woman in white the parliamentarian?
How can she allow a motion to table when the other guy didn't yield the floor?
I have no idea what's going on.
Who is the lady next to the chairman? Seems to me she should take over the mic.
She's the Parliamentarian. She's the one who actually knows the rules.Who is the lady next to the chairman? Seems to me she should take over the mic.
Who is the lady next to the chairman? Seems to me she should take over the mic.
oh shit, Senator Watson is laying DA HAMMER down.
Who is the lady next to the chairman? Seems to me she should take over the mic.
The movie could have many titles.
"The Table"
"Parliamentary Inquiry"
"Point of Order"
"Motion to Regard"
Shoulda dropped the mic after that.
It will take them about 15 mins just to figure this out.
Yeah who is she? She seems to be the rule checker for the chair person. But man no one knows what is going on.
1 hr and 20 minutes.
How long does it take to vote?
If it comes down to the last 5 minutes? Is that enough? Or no?
I missed the last 5 minutes, what did Senator Watson do?
Filibusters are one of the worst tools in American politics. It's the equivalent of taking your ball and going home when you're losing.
I missed the last 5 minutes, what did Senator Watson do?
I missed the last 5 minutes, what did Senator Watson do?
I missed the last 5 minutes, what did Senator Watson do?
Yep. But when human rights are at stake, sometimes it's important to take your ball and go home.
This is so entertaining to watch.
And especially if you have a side to root for. It's just like watching a sporting event.
I missed the last 5 minutes, what did Senator Watson do?
Irrelevant to my claim. Filibusters are terrible regardless of the party or agenda.What do you call the tactics used to get this bill voted on?
Except standing in the midst of everyone doesn't stop everyone else from playing the game by the rules. In this case, it does. It's a poor-sport tactic used by both sides.Actually it is more like taking your ball, standing in the midst of everyone, and saying "come and fucking get it."
Avoiding a quorum is taking your ball and going home when you're losing.
True.True, but if we're bound to have them, at least make a talking filibuster, so at least it's entertaining.
Fuck that procedural crap the US Senate has.
But that's when the separation of powers is for. It's the Court's job to decide when a majority legislature is in the wrong, not the job of a single legislator.They have their purpose though. Direct democracy and majority +1 for all legislative purposes are dangerous tools.
Who dropped it first? Did it land on it's top or bottom side? Was it facing the north star or the south?