So, rule by whoever screams the loudest and might get the most violent? Yeah, no thanks.
Get off your high horse. What you want is rule by whichever side ignores the most rules.
So, rule by whoever screams the loudest and might get the most violent? Yeah, no thanks.
Olivia Messer ‏@OliviaMesser 18m
Timekeeper says the vote started at 12:03 #sb5
So, rule by whoever screams the loudest and might get the most violent? Yeah, no thanks.
So, rule by whoever screams the loudest and might get the most violent? Yeah, no thanks.
So, rule by whoever screams the loudest and might get the most violent? Yeah, no thanks.
Get off your high horse. What you want is rule by whichever side ignores the most rules.
So, rule by whoever screams the loudest and might get the most violent? Yeah, no thanks.
Get off your high horse. What you want is rule by whichever side ignores the most rules.
Moving the previous question is a motion to immediately vote on a bill. It's a necessary step before actually voting on a bill.
http://www.capitol.state.tx.us/BillLookup/History.aspx?LegSess=831&Bill=SB5
I guess the voting records changed again and now show the vote took place on 6/25.
How can that be legal? Shouldn't there be records of all the times it was edited to change the dates??
Honestly, he's not worth responding too. He's pretty much admitted that he only comes into these types of threads to offer up devils advocate stances. I learned my lesson awhile ago to simply not get into it with him.
There's no times at all either. Just dates.http://www.capitol.state.tx.us/BillLookup/History.aspx?LegSess=831&Bill=SB5
I guess the voting records changed again and now show the vote took place on 6/25.
How can that be legal? Shouldn't there be records of all the times it was edited to change the dates??
Are there any pictures of the crowd outside the capitol building?
was reported like half an hour ago it said 25.
ChrisTomlinson ‏@cltomlinson 4m
The official Senate record says it passed. So only a lawsuit can reverse that. #sb5 #txlege
So, rule by whoever screams the loudest and might get the most violent? Yeah, no thanks.
Devil's advocates and contrarians for contrarian's sake are trolls.
that's 3:03pm in real america time
Bill Zedler @Bill_Zedler
We had terrorist in the Texas State Senate opposing SB 5
No strawman - that's exactly what the poster was arguing for. Not getting our way? Scream and kick and shut down the process.
I think GAF has made the mistake (along with most everyone watching that stream) of thinking that the people in the gallery are representative of the People of Texas as a whole.
Let's Bleeding Kansas this shit. America, love it or move here (and bring guns)
http://www.capitol.state.tx.us/BillLookup/History.aspx?LegSess=831&Bill=SB5
I guess the voting records changed again and now show the vote took place on 6/25.
How can that be legal? Shouldn't there be records of all the times it was edited to change the dates??
Meanwhile, from the Texas House (district 96, to be exact)...
No strawman - that's exactly what the poster was arguing for. Not getting our way? Scream and kick and shut down the process.
The quote firmly establishes very few people wanted this brought up in the special session. There has to be backlash for the way this went down.
No strawman - that's exactly what the poster was arguing for. Not getting our way? Scream and kick and shut down the process.
I think GAF has made the mistake (along with most everyone watching that stream) of thinking that the people in the gallery are representative of the People of Texas as a whole. I am pretty sure that they are not, and instead are just the more motivated folks on this issue. If the vote did occur after midnight it will be because of external interference, not the will of the people of Texas, and the bill will come back either in another special legislative session or during the next proper one.
No strawman - that's exactly what the poster was arguing for. Not getting our way? Scream and kick and shut down the process.
I think GAF has made the mistake (along with most everyone watching that stream) of thinking that the people in the gallery are representative of the People of Texas as a whole. I am pretty sure that they are not, and instead are just the more motivated folks on this issue. If the vote did occur after midnight it will be because of external interference, not the will of the people of Texas, and the bill will come back either in another special legislative session or during the next proper one.
Considering this would raise gun sales from alarmists and nuts, I'm sure they'll be all for it.Careful what you wish for, Texas . . . I see a rise in illegal aliens being forced to go through with pregnancies.
Yeah, after rereading it, it's clear that the 80% stat is not related to the previous sentence about the bill not having popular support. For whatever reason I thought the 80% was in relation to the bill's overall support, so when someone mentioned Texas supported the bill overall and I said I thought it was the opposite and tried to find that post, I misread it again.
I have no idea if this is legitimate, supposedly from @ProgressTX :
No strawman - that's exactly what the poster was arguing for. Not getting our way? Scream and kick and shut down the process.
I think GAF has made the mistake (along with most everyone watching that stream) of thinking that the people in the gallery are representative of the People of Texas as a whole. I am pretty sure that they are not, and instead are just the more motivated folks on this issue. If the vote did occur after midnight it will be because of external interference, not the will of the people of Texas, and the bill will come back either in another special legislative session or during the next proper one.
Like I said before, this is taking away rights from women, will create poverty, and theocratic. You're goddamned right they should shut down the process.
Like I said before, this is taking away rights from women, will create poverty, and is theocratic. You're goddamned right they should shut down the process. And it's on you to explain why they shouldn't.
I think GAF has made the mistake (along with most everyone watching that stream) of thinking that the people in the gallery are representative of the People of Texas as a whole. I am pretty sure that they are not, and instead are just the more motivated folks on this issue.
http://instagram.com/p/bAvU9RMn7O/
that photo is the same
When the process is illegal, deaf, and malevolent? Abso-fucking-lutely.No strawman - that's exactly what the poster was arguing for. Not getting our way? Scream and kick and shut down the process.
Did you watch what happened? The GOP intentionally ignored all the rules, even when directed towards them, to UNETHICALLY shut down the filibuster.
She violated no rule the 3rd time. She did not violate 3 germaneness rules even if she had, only 2. They took the floor away from Watson when it was his to allow a motion to table out of order. They literally cut off the mikes of the Democrats to prevent them from making a motion or inquiry.
The GOP fucking broke every rule in their books for how to proceed in order to get a vote on this bill. The gallery recognized this and tried their best to stop the GOP from making a mockery of the process.
But you want to blame them? Fuck that bullshit. The Republicans acted like fucking fascists to pass their fascist policies.
It's baffling to me that you keep posting this when it's been pointed out repeatedly in this thread that 83% of Texans don't support the passing of this bill in this session (and 63% don't want it passed at all).
Guess they'll rewrite anything and anything if needed. Oh well.