Cyborg
Member
Not to make you angry but I think you are in for a dissapointment!
Ubisoft issues totally convincing response to Assassin's Creed Unity's resolution
- Thread starter shinobi602
- Start date
Not to make you angry but I think you are in for a dissapointment!
PetriP-TNT
Member
How long have you had that BANZAI METHOD tag? It's A+
EmptySpace
Banned
eh...i wouldn't say ubi was paid.
i see it as ubi not bothering to improve the ps4 version after a certain requirement was met.
and while that may be okay with devs, that shouldn't be okay with consumers.
we all know which is the more capable system.. the ones who are trying to minimise the differences are delusional. in fact, the difference can result in more than a higher resolution. better postproc effects, faster loading, etc. should be attainable in one of the consoles.
Sorry that I've come across as condescending and prickish, and invested. Sorry, really. I didn't think I'd end up making a mountain of a mole hill, because I thought we all knew that this isn't just about resolution but about the politics of it as well, for lack of a better word. But yeah, like bishoptl is no doubt recommending, I'm going to go chill out. Again, I'm sorry.
Cave Johnson
Member
So you bought a PS4 for a specific outcome and now that outcome is compromised you're ok with it? Which is it? You're just jumping from one position to the other.
There's awesome games on the X1 you know. Unless you prefer the PS4's exclusives, in which case if it doesn't bother you I don't see why you have undermine concerns in the first place.
Luck? The PS4 is objectively more powerful. It wins in every multi-plat scenario aside from the ones that are equal to the X1. When Ubisoft enforces forced "parity", one consoles is being dragged down which is the PS4. This is the main contention.
But can you join the ranks of gamers who think a game is not ruined by a slightly "lower" resolution? If not, that makes you a hypocrite.
Art, tech, details, effects get significantly better every generation. A lower resolution makes it difficult to access the exact quality of such details; however, that is up to your perspective.
Nope.
I already see thousands of NPC/AI in other games, pretty common in strategy game. BTW, you have new gameplay footage of these thousands of NPC in AC: U? Or are we just going to take Ubisoft words for it?
1 to 1 scaling? Of what? Buildings? Okay...
New climbing mechanics? I read the preview, and they literally added two buttons for up/down...Cool.
Ton of new animations? Wut? You need to be less vague since fighting games have more unique animations and movements than a action adventure game.
Heck, even the climbing animation of AC is a failure when you compare to the more realistic MGSV one, and how BB's usage of his arms and relax stage within the climbing stages.
So no, I don't see any advancement. Just another rehash.
TetraGenesis
Member
OH MY FUCKING GOD HE'S AT IT AGAIN
Everything can be reduced to shit when you spin it this way. Imo AC:U is currently one of the most beautiful and technologically advanced games this gen.
Lord of Castamere
Member
I'm getting flashbacks to an equally amazing thread. Where I unrelatedy stated that Destiny stood no chance at winning majority GOTY and was right. ummm so yeah... Ubisoft sucks...
robertsan21
Member
Wow Ubisoft, really?
It´s going to be very interesting to see the DF analysis on this game once it´s out.
It´s going to be very interesting to see the DF analysis on this game once it´s out.
geordiemp
Member
if its 900p it can share equally worst graphics on my W900 TV with Watchdogs in 2014.
Being equal worst looking, is that good.
Watchdogs said same thing, it looks like shit compared to every other Ps4 game on my TV.
Fool me once Ubi.....
Doctor_Thomas
Member
No quarter!
StrongBlackVine
Banned
Not while looking amazing.
StrongBlackVine
Banned
Naughty Dog hasn't disappointed me yet in 5 purchases.
PurpleEggRoll
Banned
It's the watch_dawgs fiasco all over again.
I was talking about graphical fidelity, amount of stuff happening on screen and how good it looks, not about resolution. Don't know how WD running 900p on 1080p display feels like, but that game looked pretty damn good on my pc.
It's difficult to assess the validity of Pontbriand's claims in the wake of the PR explosion, but I feel for him and can sympathize. When you're in the middle of an interview your mind is constantly scrambling to answer the question you just got tossed, and sometimes things just come out wrong. It can be so easy to have your off the cuff in-person answer be different from how you'd articulate yourself given the opportunity to think through your answer. And I don't mean that in the sense that you're trying to cover something up or spin it in a positive manner, I just mean that it's easy to say something that can easily sound bad, and once it's been said there's no good way to correct your statement without making it worse.
DarkoMaledictus
Tier Whore
Yep seriously, sorry don't watch tv at all.. never heard of her. Thanks
Lmao can't wait for the UC4 graphics thread. The TLOU:R one was gold.
Turin Turambar
Member
Yes, which is why we know he is lying.
xDUMPWEEDx
Banned
Scrooge McDuck
Member
Is there really no difference at all between both versions of the games?
Phreakuency
Banned
I see you have moved on to the next Naughty Dog game lol
Correct. Also, I have every right to do whatever I want with my money. It's my money.
Good luck Ubisoft... You'll need it. Just saying.
Not Spaceghost
Spaceghost
Wouldn't it just have been easier and more polite to say "We just wanted everyone to experience the game the same way and we didn't want to play favorites"
sure it's still a horrible argument but whatever at least it's better than that mess which still basically got to a similar point, but it's the way you say these things that fucks you over ubi.
sure it's still a horrible argument but whatever at least it's better than that mess which still basically got to a similar point, but it's the way you say these things that fucks you over ubi.
sameoldstranger
Banned
ISee
Member
First sentence is already a lie. You're no longer bearable Ubisoft.
For example you restricted Watch_Dogs PC. You deactivated graphic files 'too improve performance' instead of implementing them as options ind the graphic settings.
Later they were reanabled by modders (TheWorse,Kadzait24 e.g.). And the improvment to graphical fidelity was huge like adding dynamic shadows from headlights.
But no, you would never ever constrain your games... Sure
Why would people be cranky?
It makes business sense to not waste additional resources on a system with a small userbase.
Dark_castle
Junior Member
Wrong choice of words? lol...
How about last generation. When the PS3 got shoddy ports due to its difficult architecture, Sony fans squealed. When devs spent extra time on the PS3 version to achieve "parity" did anyone cry about it?
Saintguine
Member
Should we start dropping supplies off to Ubisoft? Because that's one really fucking deep hole.
The PS3 was not technically inferior to the 360. The Xbone is technically inferior to the PS4.
robertsan21
Member
PS3 and 360 did not have that big of a difference hardwearwise, PS3 was actually even better, exclusives show that.
The gap between PS4 and Xbox one is much bigger
Why would anyone cry, both hardwares were inferior.
However, the PS3 cell was still better/powerful so if they achieved "parity", it was expected since the 360 was already at cap.
So why would anyone be angry if both were at 100% capped? Parity would have meant that they reduced 360 optimization to fix/match the PS3 port.
But we didn't see that did we?
This gen is different since new games have been able to reach 1080 for one system on a regular basic.
There is a huge gap between two hardwares.
As has been stated, the PS3 was harder to develop for, often resulting in inferior multiplats. Parity in those instances would have been developing the PS3 version to the best level they could, then limiting the 360 version to that level when they could achieve more.
You know, to avoid debates and stuff.
The power difference last gen was negligible and differences were mostly down to tools and ease of development. I also can't think of a singly instance of parity happening.
TheLegendOfMart
Banned
Yet Unity is running 900p on Xbox One, with a 30-50% more powerful GPU the PS4 can run it at 1080p without question.
How so?
The ICE Team who helped develop the PS4 hardware and software, the team that develops graphics engines, tools and technologies for all first party studios comprise of Naughty Dog engineers among other studios. I think if anyone can set a new benchmark then it is them.
Turin Turambar
Member
We don't know, but if there is any, the moment to say it would have been in this response.
If it's at 900p though it will still have jagged edges due to scaling.
rocketskates
Member
But look at how beautiful Paris is you guis.
It is I played it at EGX
(although I did also play an unlocked version of SoM and look how that turned out!)
But pretty sure both version will make 1080[900]/30 as per the show
But pretty sure both version will make 1080[900]/30 as per the show
GhostTrick
Banned
I didn't knew 1080p was so important for so much person.
60 dollars important even !
60 dollars important even !
orthodoxy1095
Banned
Based on what evidence?
