If they are truly disciplining a kid that young for accidentally misgendering a kid then I can see their point a little. However, it's a life lesson everyone should learn.
I'm curious what the
nature of the discipline is.
At age 6, I'd assume disciplining for a genuine innocent error of that nature boils down to 'don't do that, it's not nice'. I don't think that's unreasonable, and if the parents are withdrawing for
that reason, they're just looking for an excuse.
If the disciplining
is more serious - are we talking exclusionary measures, here? - I'd assume we're looking at something way more deliberate and cruel than an accident. At which point the discipline is significant, yes, but so is the transgression.
I note the parents are pitching it as "Innocent mistake -> Significant discipline", and I suspect that someone's not being honest - I would note, though, that that's not
necessarily the parents being dishonest, the child might have downplayed the nastiness.
I would also suggest that there are
other kids in these classes, and there's nothing in the news report that suggests that other kids are having great difficulty with this concept... except for the older brother. Funny, that.
I don't think it is either. Confusion only really seems likely to arise when what is being taught by parents is dramatically different to what is being taught at school.
To get into a broader question, here: at what point should those parents' teachings be regarded as
child abuse? I'm thinking of the specific instances where the child
themselves might be trans (or indeed gay, or any one of a number of such traits), and is having to reconcile how they feel with the fact that the parents are - unknowingly - asserting that that's terrible.
Once upon a time children were commonly beaten for having the
audacity to be
left-handed. I'd like us to be better than repeating history.