Re: social conservatism - I did one of those "isidewith" questionaire thingies today, just for fun since some guys in the whatsapp group were doing it.
I consider myself to be a fairly liberal guy (don't laugh). There were questions in there about same-sex marriage, abortion, drug use legalisation, etc. and I'm like sure go ahead, fill your boots, tick tick tick.
Result comes out...
87% Conservative
I know the Tories are "right wing" but it really just seems like the whole of the political scene has moved on with regard to all these. Noone is talking about rolling back any of them!
Sure, here you go: https://uk.isidewith.com/
I'm sure there are others but that's the one I used. Seems pretty decent as it gives you a number of options and then asks how important each thing is.
The right wing has instituted two massive changes in British social and political life in the past 40 years (Thatcherism, and now Brexit), but for anybody on the left to have aspirations for major change they're told it's pie-in-the-sky, unrealistic, politics doesn't work that way. Why is this? Can somebody explain it to me? With all the talk of 'minor improvements' and 'don't rock the boat too much', people hoping for New New Labour are basically letting the Tories (and in fact, even darker, further right-wing groups like UKIP) win every significant political victory.
The Left used to think that they could change things in a big way, and in fact they did, back in the 1950s. Now they're happy as long as government spending is only cut by 20% instead of 22%.
You did ask.
They aren't right now. What worries me is that if Brexit really is the shitshow that a lot of smart people think it will be, they might be in a decade. Economic issues tend to breed social issues.
What's missing from your putative explanation is any recognition that the narratives pushed by the right can be challenged in any way. You're playing by their rules the whole time instead of seeking to upend them, like Attlee did in the 1950s and Thatcher did in the 1970s.Fiscal gravity.
The left wants to build more 'blocks' (programs, institutions, systems) higher and higher and reach for the sun. As such the tower can wobble and slow patience and a metred approach is required so the jabbing fingers of the right over "fiscal irresponsibility" can't bring the whole jenga tower down. Sometimes you just have to stick and maintain rather than keep reaching for an impossible ideal. Protect the height you've already reached.
The right doesn't want to build that tower. It wants to keep it at ground level, separated up or not even in their line of sight at all. It is of course easier to bring a tower crashing down than it is to continue to build upwards. "Keep it simple, stupid" is a populist approach after all.
Therefore the Right gets to always operate on easy mode, the left on hard. The left has to acknowledge that winning on hard mode, (gravity on, headshots on), they have to play slower, more methodical, sneakier, and so on.
Secondary to that, to not get bogged down in the pursuit of 'liberal perfection' and just accepting progress and good, especially not falling for all the hindsight hot takes. Looking at things in shades of grey rather than black and white. Blair's government pushed a lot of things forward in this country and achieved great things but because of Iraq and all that, everyone wants to scratch the whole era off the history books when it was Labour's most successful. 2017 World judging the 2003 World is going to throw up some differences for a start. It's self sabotage and it's greatly responsible for where the Labour party is today.
More than anything, New Labour seemed like a gang that could run a country and get the job done. Corbyn's Labour can't even get on a fucking train right.
On a side note, is there a country where the green party actually ever won an important election?
Congratulations on doing exactly what the Tories want you to. The Lib Dems did a hell of a lot of good in 2010. Everyone focuses on the tuition fees, but that was a necessary move to mitigate a lot of the other damage the Tories did and to get through some genuinely good stuff. Without the coalition, none of the mitigation would have happened, and when the next election happened and the Tories had an absolute majority they'd have pushed through all their shit anyway. Look at the damage the Tories did in coalition government. Now look at the damage they did on their own. Now look at the damage they're going to do with an increased majority.
And after all that you want to blame the Lib Dems for everything that was bad in the coalition government?
anyone voting lib dem?
honest question
80% Labour
80% Green
79% SNP
75% Liberal Democrat
74% Plaid Cymru
67% Sinn Féin
51% Democratic Unionist
49% Conservative
41% British National
33% UKIP
You know I basically side with everything on labor besides brexit and and really do agree with their pledges even if I don't believe in then.
But I just can't give them my vote, I guess it will be the green party, better than not voting at least.
On a side note, is there a country where the green party actually ever won an important election?
why isn;'t May holding this election in May? Surely the headlines and puns would give her a boost?
anyone voting lib dem?
honest question
64% Labour
53% Liberal Democrat
51% Green
51% SNP
41% Sinn Fein
41% Plaid Cymru
31% Conservative
21% UKIP
15% BNP
11% DUP
64% Labour
53% Liberal Democrat
51% Green
51% SNP
41% Sinn Fein
41% Plaid Cymru
31% Conservative
21% UKIP
15% BNP
11% DUP
I love the fact that the person trying to get a labour MP nomination has one of the lowest labour scores on the board... ;-)
Congrats to anyone who can get through this without wanting to die http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-39659304
Congrats to anyone who can get through this without wanting to die http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-39659304
Does Ireland often have coalitions? It uses STV after all which is a better voting system.
So my vote is null and void anyway as the non conservative votes are too split to win (though the local conservative MP might have reached breaking point with how they're a Brexiteer in a remain area and have focused energies on a very odd sort of environmental issue but thing is they've always been rubbish and got in because of being conservative rather than inpsite of...)...shame there is not some kind of alternative way to vote...oh wait that suggested and rejected.*** Constituency voters side mostly Conservative. You disagree with most *** voters on almost all issues, especially Economic and Healthcare issues. You might want to consider moving to one of these regions.
There very rarely seems to be an acknowledgement from people on the left that those on the right actually might have their heart in the right place too but disagree with the methods to achieve it. The right seems to always be portrayed as basically evil, sadistic and finding pleasure in the suffering of others. I don't really understand why, because the idea that they merely disagree​ on methods requires far less logical backflips.
Don't fuck this one up Britain.
Dont. Fuck. This up.
England (and Wales!) are gonna fuck this one up aren't they.
Don't fuck this one up Britain.
Dont. Fuck. This up.
England (and Wales!) are gonna fuck this one up aren't they.
Yep. The successful propaganda campaign against corbyn...
There very rarely seems to be an acknowledgement from people on the left that those on the right actually might have their heart in the right place too but disagree with the methods to achieve it. The right seems to always be portrayed as basically evil, sadistic and finding pleasure in the suffering of others. I don't really understand why, because the idea that they merely disagree​ on methods requires far less logical backflips.