This is a really strong point.
Germany kick our arses in every measure. Why don't we just copy them.
great point about investment by comparing to germany
The males in this audience are the biggest shower of cunts I've seen in a long time.
Surely no first use of the weapon is a key component of what makes MAD work?
No one wants to use it first because of what happens after.
Consigned, see Theresa, that's how you do it. Fucking easy.The males in this audience are the biggest shower of cunts I've seen in a long time.
Germany kick our arses in every measure. Why don't we just nuke them first?
How is Corbyn doing?
How is Corbyn doing?
how how how does Corbyn get so many questions about terrorism while Theresa May is never challenge on her arms deals with Saudi Arabia?
How is Corbyn doing?
This is being terribly managed. Interesting issues are being talked about for a tiny period and then someone just railroads the whole conversation with total nonsense. It's often the same people over and over too. Zero hours contracts? No fuck that, some moron in the back row with an incredibly simplistic view on the IRA (as well as North Korea and foreign aid) wants to take over!
I can't believe nuclear weapons and the fucking IRA are electoral issues. After the absurdity of the Brexit debates last year and beyond, and now this, I've never felt more out of touch with UK politics or the general public.
Using a nuke in 1945 was unnecessary. One going off this century is very likely the the end of humanity.People need to realise what a nuke actually does
The British public are fucking stupid.
.People need to realise what a nuke actually does
Started strong. The audience are fucking crazy and nuking. His view point is not compatible with that, so went downhill immediately.How is Corbyn doing?
This IRA/Corbyn and Nuclear thing will be pushed till the election day tbh.
Even if he answers it well.
Fixed that for you
MAD isn't the core of nuclear defence policy - nuclear defence is really ruled by a system of guaranteed escalation. If you invade Ukraine, I will respond with X. If you respond to X with escalation, I shall escalate. If you threaten with nukes, I will not hesitate to deploy nukes.
Nuclear defence policy relies 100% on being prepared to nuke someone as a first strike - otherwise you have the question of "would you let Washington be nuked to save Paris?" which means your opponent is really just trying to figure out what they can get away with, not work peacefully with you.
I think it's called something like Guaranteed Escalation, but I studied nuclear defence policy about six years ago so I might be wrong.
Using a nuke in 1945 was unnecessary. One going off this century is very likely the the end of humanity.
.
it kills the terrorists don't it?
Where can I find a link to a debate stream?
Does she hate herself? Why do poeple hate policies that are good for themselves?