• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

UK PoliGAF: General election thread of LibCon Coalitionage

Status
Not open for further replies.

painey

Member
320 Houghton & Sunderland South 23:00
551 Sunderland Central 23:30
603 Washington & Sunderland West 23:30

bold = results in
 

sohois

Member
avaya said:
Fantasy supply-side focus. Snake oil economics.

Re-branding of VAST education cuts as "Big Society" through people starting their own schools.

Gutting the BBC and Ofcom to aid a dying Murdoch empire, allowing him to bring Fox-News to the UK via Sky. That alone should be fucking scary enough.

Then you realise the party underneath it all is no different from what they were under that witch in her second term.

I missed your reply before, apologies.

To all of your points i must once again ask for evidence. i would make a more detailed reply, but i wish to pay more attention to the election coverage, and i feel that our debate would get lost in the mass of posts. If it's no trouble, perhaps we could continue this in later?
 

Wes

venison crêpe
Who is this guy sitting across from Nick Robinson? It's like his grey shadow has taken form and even that is full of political insight.
 

Kowak

Banned
xbhaskarx said:
Wow, 11.6% swing to Conservatives in Washington Sunderland West.
Greater swing than Thatcher and Blair.
Exit polls underestimating Conservatives.
If the swing was nationwide it would be the largest since 1945.

yeah 7% was expected for england. didnt expect 8-11% in the north east
 
Wtf is this Professor from Oxford talking about with this "if that swing was repeated all across the country.." How does anyone in their right mind even consider the logic that a specific percentage change would be repeated in 326 consecutive seats? Is this all he is going to say tonight because he's already repeated it twice in two different examples.
 

Acheteedo

Member
gordon-head-hands.gif


So... the situation is starting to look worse than the exit polls.
 

Ushojax

Should probably not trust the 7-11 security cameras quite so much
Bleurgh. Not liking the swings the Tories are getting. I guess all that scaremongering worked.
 

Sage00

Once And Future Member
Meus Renaissance said:
Wtf is this Professor from Oxford talking about with this "if that swing was repeated all across the country.." How does anyone in their right mind even consider the logic that a specific percentage change would be repeated in 326 consecutive seats? Is this all he is going to say tonight because he's already repeated it twice in two different examples.
These are 2 safe Labour seats where the swing should be smallest. It looks really bad if the swing is so high there, an equal or greater swing could usually be expected across the rest of the seats.
 

pulsemyne

Member
It's all about the marginals. Any swing in safe seats really should be ignored. These areas have a very low turnout compared to the rest of the country so really ignore it. Some people just can't be asked to vote for the ruling party in a safe seat. We saw some crazy swings in the last election.
 

Dabanton

Member
Meus Renaissance said:
Wtf is this Professor from Oxford talking about with this "if that swing was repeated all across the country.." How does anyone in their right mind even consider the logic that a specific percentage change would be repeated in 326 consecutive seats? Is this all he is going to say tonight because he's already repeated it twice in two different examples.

I thought i was going mad

So he did say the exact same thing earlier. :lol
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom