• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

UK PoliGAF: General election thread of LibCon Coalitionage

Status
Not open for further replies.

Veidt

Blasphemer who refuses to accept bagged milk as his personal savior
Chinner said:
Update: Camerons's car spotted on motorway to Burger King - speculation that Clegg doesn't like McDonalds?

Update: He appears to be sitting on a bench, next to a...DUCK!?!?!

APZonerunner said:
We just ought to get this over with and activate the queen.

And doom us ALL?
 
Serious talking, I might actually feel slightly uncomfortable if Labour actually offer a change in the political system without a referendum. I'd say yes obviously in a referendum, but I'd rather it goes to the people than political parties trying to one up each other.
 

CrunchinJelly

formerly cjelly
I've seen the Adam Boulton Vs Alastair Campbell video from today... what happened with Nick Robinson?

I heard he was almost in tears when he heard Labour were talking to the Lib Dems too. Bless his little blue cotton socks. :lol
 

avaya

Member
Look at who is negotiating.

The Lib Dem team is Laws and Huhne. Two former City boys. Big dick players. Big dick. Tom Cruise in Tropic Thunder big dick.

They are going against Hague, the cretin Osborne and 16th century relic Oliver Letwin.

This is not even a contest.
 

Sage00

Once And Future Member
killer_clank said:
Serious talking, I might actually feel slightly uncomfortable if Labour actually offer a change in the political system without a referendum. I'd say yes obviously in a referendum, but I'd rather it goes to the people than political parties trying to one up each other.
I'd agree with you if it was for PR, but this is just AV. It's FPTP but with fairness added. There's no real need for a vote.
 

Varion

Member
So the Lib Dems will be discussing the Tories' offer further.

Wonder if they're actually considering taking it. Wouldn't be surprised if they were meeting Labour to see if they could guarantee PR just in case.
 
avaya said:
Look at who is negotiating.

The Lib Dem team is Laws and Huhne. Two former City boys. Big dick players. Big dick. Tom Cruise in Tropic Thunder big dick.

They are going against Hague, the cretin Osborne and 16th century relic Oliver Letwin.

This is not even a contest.
cruisin.gif
 

NekoFever

Member
Well today got interesting :lol

I've already had my mum on the phone saying how terrible and undemocratic it is that we'll get an unelected Labour PM - as opposed to an unelected Tory PM, presumably. I swear the number of people saying this makes me think we should stop pretending that we vote for our MPs and move to a presidential system.

I've also just seen a column on the Telegraph complaining about how unfair AV would be because it disadvantages the Tories. As if getting a go at the wheel is a right...
 

Wes

venison crêpe
The jump from AV to a more PR based system would be more realistic than FPTP to PR. Maybe this is good for the long run?

We're not really thinking about the fact that in the referendum people might not actually want AV. The Lib Dems would be fucked then.
 

Varion

Member
Wes said:
The jump from AV to a more PR based system would be more realistic than FPTP to PR. Maybe this is good for the long run?

We're not really thinking about the fact that in the referendum people might not actually want AV. The Lib Dems would be fucked then.
Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but it seems like AV would benefit the Lib Dems to a degree (because a lot of people would put them as their second choice). Which would possibly lead to more hung parliaments, and therefore better chance later down the line for PR.

On the other hand, if this opportunity is lost and we don't get any voting reform, then we're just back where we started.
 

gerg

Member
NekoFever said:
I've also just seen a column on the Telegraph complaining about how unfair AV would be because it disadvantages the Tories. As if getting a go at the wheel is a right...

And yet there are people saying that FPTP needs to go because it disadvantages the Liberal Democrats, so...
 

sohois

Member
Varion said:
So the Lib Dems will be discussing the Tories' offer further.

Wonder if they're actually considering taking it. Wouldn't be surprised if they were meeting Labour to see if they could guarantee PR just in case.

A labour-liberal-nationalist coalition would be extremely precarious, and not necessarily any better for libdems than the Tory offer would be. I'd imagine the libdems long term strategy would be to let the Tories run a minority government with the guarantee of an electoral reform referendum, thus allowing the Tories to take action to cut the deficit, while also avoiding a lot of the negativity that will come from the cuts. At the next election they would find their position significantly improved if some form of pr passes and they can avoid being seen as past of the cutting government.
 

defel

Member
avaya said:
The Boulton thing with Campbell was fucking immense.

Boulton is such a lightweight compared to Campbell :lol

IF things got physical there would only be one winner. Boulton-Body Slam!
 

Sage00

Once And Future Member
Varion said:
Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but it seems like AV would benefit the Lib Dems to a degree (because a lot of people would put them as their second choice). Which would possibly lead to more hung parliaments, and therefore better chance later down the line for PR.

On the other hand, if this opportunity is lost and we don't get any voting reform, then we're just back where we started.
If the Conservatives put it to a referendum they'll get their entire party and press support behind voting "No", since it'll lead to more "unstable governments" etc. The whole thing they've been doing in this campaign, and I think they might win by putting the fear in people.
 
If a rainbow coalition is to go ahead, the SNP are going be complete bastards about getting what they want. They'll ask for absolutely no cuts towards scotland whatsoever, I'm guessing.
 
avaya said:
The Boulton thing with Campbell was fucking immense.

Boulton is such a lightweight compared to Campbell :lol
I don't know why Boulton thought he'd get anywhere by puffing his chest up and trying to get in Campbell's face. Campbell is one of the most intimidating men in politics, he's hardly going to get fazed by a little turd like Boulton.
 
Gary Whitta said:
I don't know why Boulton thought he'd get anywhere by puffing his chest up and trying to get in Campbell's face. Campbell is one of the most intimidating men in politics, he's hardly going to get fazed by a little turd like Boulton.

It was hilarious. He almost looked as if he was about to punch him.
 

phisheep

NeoGAF's Chief Barrister
Puts Clegg in a very powerful position, as whichever way he goes, he will have to explain his decision on principled grounds. That will be probably one of the most important political speeches in the last 50 years, as it has the potential to utterly destroy either Labour or the Conservatives - or at least to put them to sleep for a long while.

it's worth considering the sticking points.

For the Conservative deal the sticking points are:
- something to do with education
- electoral reform
- taxation policy

For the Labour deal I think the sticking points are likely to be:
- strength and stability of the coalition
- credibility of economic plans
- fairness of budget cuts (if large chunks are ringfenced in Scotland etc and by public service unions)
- perhaps civil liberties

And central to the whole lot is whether the parties are patently negotiating in good faith and in the national interest.

It isn't an easy choice.

I have half a mind to nip down to Parliament Square with a banner saying 'Does Clegg support Civil Liberties?' - for which I will get arrested on camera. That should be fun.

The long-term future of the LibDems would arguable be better served by shafting Labour.
 

Walshicus

Member
killer_clank said:
If a rainbow coalition is to go ahead, the SNP are going be complete bastards about getting what they want. They'll ask for absolutely no cuts towards scotland whatsoever, I'm guessing.
I think the SNP and PC will be content with voting reform. The SNP will make the case for more powers transfered to Holyrood and they'll probably get it, but that's not a bad thing.
 

Wes

venison crêpe
They were asked not to start leadership campaigns tonight incase it rocks discussions with the Lib Dems :lol
 

Veidt

Blasphemer who refuses to accept bagged milk as his personal savior
killer_clank said:
The guys at Sony, MS and Nintendo need to be watching this shit to learn how to drop a MEGATON. A++ for today's ones.
Miliband does look like Reggie.
 

Xavien

Member
Sir Fragula said:
I think the SNP and PC will be content with voting reform. The SNP will make the case for more powers transfered to Holyrood and they'll probably get it, but that's not a bad thing.

Yep, Nationalists are dreaming for voting reform.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom