• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

UK PoliGAF |OT3| - Strong and Stable Government? No. Coalition Of Chaos!

Status
Not open for further replies.

Burai

shitonmychest57
I think it also created the situation where, despite the Tory's efforts ("There's no magic money tree!"), it caused people to take a greater look at the Labour manifesto in contrast, and many found themselves surprisingly liking it.

Brexit was supposed to make the country better off according to the proponents, so for a cabinet of Brexiteers to present a manifesto that paints the country as needing to cut back even more once we're out of the EU was always going to go down like a sack of shit.
 
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-scotland-politics-41082916

Kezia Dugdale has resigned as leader of Scottish Labour, saying it is time to "pass on the baton" to someone else.
Ms Dugdale has previously criticised UK leader Jeremy Corbyn, and has faced criticism from left-wing members of her own party.
She insisted she was leaving the party in a much better state than she had found it.
But she said a new leader was needed with "fresh energy, drive and a new mandate".
Ms Dugdale said she wanted to give her successor the "space and time" to prepare for the next Scottish Parliament election in 2021.
And she strongly denied suggestions that she was leaving now in order to avoid being pushed out by supporters of Mr Corbyn.
 
D

Deleted member 231381

Unconfirmed Member
I was wondering how long it would be before that happened. I mean, in general I'm glad there are people selfless enough to give themselves to such unrewarding roles as what Kezia has had to do, but I'd be lying if I said I thought she'd been any good at it.
 
D

Deleted member 231381

Unconfirmed Member
Brown sponsored Balls sponsored Cooper sponsored Dugdale, in terms of intra-party alliance-making and so on. Dugdale is a Brownite, not a Blairite. Maledict is right insofar as that there's almost no Blairites left in the Labour Party now - Blair wasn't very good at raising ideological successors (at least, not ones who were very successful - Purnell and Miliband the elder both collapsed quite quickly).
 
Brown sponsored Balls sponsored Cooper sponsored Dugdale, in terms of intra-party alliance-making and so on. Dugdale is a Brownite, not a Blairite. Maledict is right insofar as that there's almost no Blairites left in the Labour Party now - Blair wasn't very good at raising ideological successors (at least, not ones who were very successful - Purnell and Miliband the elder both collapsed quite quickly).
is there a real ideological difference between Brown-ism and Blair-ism?
 
D

Deleted member 231381

Unconfirmed Member
is there a real ideological difference between Brown-ism and Blair-ism?

Brownites felt the tiniest pangs of guilt tickling their consciences.

More seriously, it's a matter of degrees, but Brownites tended to be slightly more skeptical about market-logic reforms of public services, more concerned with growing inequality (Brown frequently clashed with Blair in private over this; Blair wasn't at all concerned that inequality by some metrics rose since the standard of living for the poorest was rising, Brown thought that inequality was in itself to some degree harmful), Blairites tended to be more internationalists and more strongly in favour of the EU/other international institutions whereas I think Brownites were very skeptical of it - not negative, I do literally mean skeptical, they tended to see it as utopianism.

It's a slim gap, and nothing at all compared to, say, the gap between Brownism and Corbynism (rather large), but there were differences.
 

cabot

Member
I was fairly surprised she held on after the election to be honest, they didnt gain seats because of her.


I guess it'd look pretty strange if you had a performance considered an electoral success and then the leader resigns, mind.
 

Mr. Sam

Member
The lack of any significant change in Labour personnel across the board surprised me. Yes, John, I know it's a "winning team" but I'd be too embarrassed to loan some of these guys out to Crawley Town.
 
Shamelessly stolen from Twitter:

The UK's Prime Minister May
Announced her intention to stay
But Tory MP's're
Advising Theresa
She might have to call it a day.

---

Conference season is coming up! Hope the various political folk here enjoy their respective ones if they are going.
 
You know how people talk about how the Olympic village is just a giant fuck fest? Are the conferences a bit like that? I mean, lord knows no one can go for the speeches.

Asking for a friend.
 

Maledict

Member
You know how people talk about how the Olympic village is just a giant fuck fest? Are the conferences a bit like that? I mean, lord knows no one can go for the speeches.

Asking for a friend.

Gods no.

Only thing I can say is the Tory conference has the best food and wine.
 

Uzzy

Member
methode%2Fsundaytimes%2Fprod%2Fweb%2Fbin%2Faf403592-8ffc-11e7-8494-ef8243717286.jpg

Brutal.
 
D

Deleted member 231381

Unconfirmed Member
Any bets for the contents of Mrs. May's Mystery Monologue on September 21st?
 

Uzzy

Member
Any bets for the contents of Mrs. May's Mystery Monologue on September 21st?

It's something that would cause negotiations to be delayed, so it's obviously a release date for Half Life 3.

More realistically, I think she'll just reiterate her demands for a transition deal and say that she's willing to walk away.
 

Spuck-uk

Banned
Any bets for the contents of Mrs. May's Mystery Monologue on September 21st?

She's going to announce they're (temporarily) storming out of the Brexit negotiations (to try and look strong and stable). It will be a huge embarrassing waste of time.
 

Uzzy

Member
Diane Abbott more abused than any other MPs during election

Diane Abbott alone received almost half of all the abusive tweets sent to female MPs in the run-up to the general election, research by Amnesty International has revealed.

The shadow home secretary, who temporarily stood aside during the election campaign for health reasons, suffered a relentless campaign of racist and sexist abuse in the weeks before the 8 June poll. The abuse directed at her amounted to 10 times as much as was received by any other MP, according to the Amnesty study.

Amnesty researchers found Abbott received 45% of all abusive tweets sent to female MPs in the six weeks before election day. In the previous six months, she received just under a third of all abuse sent to the same group.
 
D

Deleted member 231381

Unconfirmed Member
Labour's shadow cabinet is agreed on a whipped vote against the Repeal Bill.
 

Maledict

Member
Labour's shadow cabinet is agreed on a whipped vote against the Repeal Bill.

Labour definitely seems to be shedding its strategy of confusion and helpful obfuscation on Brexit right now. Am guessing they also feel an election isn't coming anything soon therefore they want to be in the right side of things in the long run.
 
D

Deleted member 231381

Unconfirmed Member
Labour definitely seems to be shedding its strategy of confusion and helpful obfuscation on Brexit right now. Am guessing they also feel an election isn't coming anything soon therefore they want to be in the right side of things in the long run.

That is my perception as well. Now the threat of an imminent general election has faded (if only because the Conservatives have realised they don't actually have anyone better than May...), Labour can prepare for the long game, and wants to be on the right side when things go tits up.
 

Beefy

Member
That is my perception as well. Now the threat of an imminent general election has faded (if only because the Conservatives have realised they don't actually have anyone better than May...), Labour can prepare for the long game, and wants to be on the right side when things go tits up.

Seeing as Mogg is favorite. They are fucked.
 

cabot

Member
Mogg would only appease the base (which is where the metrics came from, the party members)


If the Tories have any sense, they realize it's going to be new blood that will give them any hope in future.
 

War Peaceman

You're a big guy.
Mogg would only appease the base (which is where the metrics came from, the party members)


If the Tories have any sense, they realize it's going to be new blood that will give them any hope in future.

There isn't any new blood. Nobody is going to want to seize the leadership, especially if they are an up-and-comer, in such a situation.
 
Speaking of Mogg, did anyone see the interview on Novara media with the leader of the Activate UK account?

https://youtu.be/Y1byFK5uwcE

The guy basically comes across as someone with absolutely no political knowledge and his only ideas are to get Mogg in power because he represents conservative values and..... That's it.

Really fucking cringe worthy (and I hate that term) and he even manages to look suspect on his opinion of the alt right and them being the same.

Props to novara getting him on, he is 'the enemy' and he ruined any shred of credibility (lol) activate may have had left.
 

Mr. Sam

Member
Word is that May is being encouraged to have a reshuffle to bring in some fresh faces and give some more obscure hopefuls an inside track. I can't remember my source so maybe that's just baseless conjecture.
 
Double Edit: my facts were straight all along!

Speaking of Mogg, did anyone see the interview on Novara media with the leader of the Activate UK account?

https://youtu.be/Y1byFK5uwcE

The guy basically comes across as someone with absolutely no political knowledge and his only ideas are to get Mogg in power because he represents conservative values and..... That's it.

Really fucking cringe worthy (and I hate that term) and he even manages to look suspect on his opinion of the alt right and them being the same.

Props to novara getting him on, he is 'the enemy' and he ruined any shred of credibility (lol) activate may have had left.


That Novara interview with the supposed Activate founder is fake. The Activate facebook page is claiming that their twitter account which publicised the interview was hacked, another member of Activate has tweeted that it was fake, and the "founder" bears a startling resemblance to one of the Novara staff.

It's a joke, and not a very good one. But then self-publicising stunts are about all Bastani and the rest of the Novara wankers are good for these days
 

Chinner

Banned
regardless if the utub is fake or not, what is the obsession of mogg? i know hes a posh twat but he doesn't seem that ambitious. edit: seems like there was a hacking attempt so maybe not? despite their publicity they're a mess.
 

Chinner

Banned
johnson has the baggage, but moggie just seems like a giant cock and a walking open goal. people (back in the day) used to like may because they thought she was just 'getting on with it', but mogg just reeks of class division.
 
Double Edit: my facts were straight all along!




That Novara interview with the supposed Activate founder is fake. The Activate facebook page is claiming that their twitter account which publicised the interview was hacked, another member of Activate has tweeted that it was fake, and the "founder" bears a startling resemblance to one of the Novara staff.

It's a joke, and not a very good one. But then self-publicising stunts are about all Bastani and the rest of the Novara wankers are good for these days
The more you know.

I have enjoyed most of the stuff of theirs I have seen (not a lot to be fair) and agree with most stuff they say. I do disagree with Aaron on some stuff though.

If this is fake then that really is shitty and I'm not particularly happy about it.

If it was parody I could understand but it needs to be clearly labelled. Otherwise it just comes across as being disingenuous and lying.
 
The more you know.

I have enjoyed most of the stuff of theirs I have seen (not a lot to be fair) and agree with most stuff they say. I do disagree with Aaron on some stuff though.

If this is fake then that really is shitty and I'm not particularly happy about it.

If it was parody I could understand but it needs to be clearly labelled. Otherwise it just comes across as being disingenuous and lying.

I'd like them more if:

a) Aaron wasn't such an opportunistic snake who jumps from one position to another based on what he thinks will be good for his career. Seriously, he's gone from Lib Dem to Green to Anarchist to Labour within a few years, not to mention that he spent months making what he claimed was a left wing case for Brexit before changing his mind on the eve of the vote

b) They didn't give platforms to rape apologists like George Galloway (and others who aren't as famous), and if a couple of their editors/collaborators weren't involved in wrecking an investigation into a sexual assault a few years back

c) They were capable of accepting comradely and constructive criticism in the spirit in which it's offered rather than being macho, bullying dickheads about anyone who questions anything they do

d) if their work was based on actual political principle rather than being a ham-fisted attempt at getting themselves media careers and/or becoming the new Spiked!

Sorry for the rant, I'd dearly love a socialist media org with their level of exposure/penetration, but Novara itself is run by a shower of utter utter bastards
 
I'd like them more if:

a) Aaron wasn't such an opportunistic snake who jumps from one position to another based on what he thinks will be good for his career. Seriously, he's gone from Lib Dem to Green to Anarchist to Labour within a few years, not to mention that he spent months making what he claimed was a left wing case for Brexit before changing his mind on the eve of the vote

b) They didn't give platforms to rape apologists like George Galloway (and others who aren't as famous), and if a couple of their editors/collaborators weren't involved in wrecking an investigation into a sexual assault a few years back

c) They were capable of accepting comradely and constructive criticism in the spirit in which it's offered rather than being macho, bullying dickheads about anyone who questions anything they do

d) if their work was based on actual political principle rather than being a ham-fisted attempt at getting themselves media careers and/or becoming the new Spiked!

Sorry for the rant, I'd dearly love a socialist media org with their level of exposure/penetration, but Novara itself is run by a shower of utter utter bastards
I knew about the Galloway thing and saw their apology video and new rules were put in place but not of the other people.

Also saw the left wing brexit video in their playlist which was actually the thing that made me start to question Aaron. Didn't know about the other changes he has made too.

It's really shitty, I was on the look out for a progressive channel /platform to follow on UK politics since we seem to lack it compared to the US. To find out that they can be that shitty is rather disheartening.
 
I knew about the Galloway thing and saw their apology video and new rules were put in place but not of the other people.

Also saw the left wing brexit video in their playlist which was actually the thing that made me start to question Aaron. Didn't know about the other changes he has made too.

It's really shitty, I was on the look out for a progressive channel /platform to follow on UK politics since we seem to lack it compared to the US. To find out that they can be that shitty is rather disheartening.

The hilarious thing is those new rules were originally promised years ago after another similar incident, but nothing ever came of it. It's only after people started boycotting them and pulling donations after the Galloway thing that they finally published them. They then went on to be braying dickheads about it so clearly they didn't actually learn anything

EDIT: I should mention that the boycott was in part started by the survivor of the assault I mentioned earlier, and in response both Aaron and James doubled down on the anonymous letter that was circulated years ago which effectively blamed her for her own assault. So fuck 'em
 
The hilarious thing is those new rules were originally promised years ago after another similar incident, but nothing ever came of it. It's only after people started boycotting them and pulling donations after the Galloway thing that they finally published them. They then went on to be braying dickheads about it so clearly they didn't actually learn anything

EDIT: I should mention that the boycott was in part started by the survivor of the assault I mentioned earlier, and in response both Aaron and James doubled down on the anonymous letter that was circulated years ago which effectively blamed her for her own assault. So fuck 'em
Really sad to hear, it just makes them as bad as the right wing. It's especially frustrating because the left have the factual and moral high ground to fight the right without having to resort to that sort of stuff.
 
James Forsyth made the point that a PM is never more powerful than immediately before a reshuffle, and as such it might be in her interests to keep the timing of it... ambiguous. There's obviously an element of boy-who-cried-wolf about it, but she can just deploy it whenever she wants so I guess people affected by either the carrot (promotion) or stick (sacking) have to stay in line, almost indefinitely.

At least til the party conference, maybe.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom