Anyone else amused by how many people can't comprehend how having "courage" says nothing about the morality of the person described?
Yes. And yet, I'm also not amused. People are reactionary to the extreme, they're jumping all over the judge without knowing the full context of the case or his comments. The BBC, Daily Mail, Express and others are all selectively quoting him, because - y'know - MORAL OUTCRY!!!11!
From what I've read, the burglaries happened in February, he confessed, was co-operative throughout, and even asked for the judge to consider other crimes in his past. He'd been introduced to Heroin and Subutex during a previous stint in prison (and lets face it, that shouldn't happen), he became addicted, and that's what spurred his crime. His family, carers and lawyer all made the case that since his arrest he's been successful in a drug program, has round the clock support and an offer of solid work if the judge would show leniency. Here's a fuller account of his statement:
"It takes a huge amount of courage as far as I can see for somebody to burgle somebody’s house. I wouldn’t have the nerve. Yet somehow, bolstered by drugs and desperation, you were prepared to do that,” he told Richard Rochford, the man in the dock yesterday.
He accepted that Rochford, 26, had been harmed by prison.
“I think prison very rarely does anybody any good,” he said. “I don’t think anybody would benefit from sending you to prison today. We’d all just feel a bit easier that a burglar had been taken off the streets.”
Judge Bowers said he deserved to be jailed for two-and-a-half years, and anything less would not satisfy the public. But he left the jail term hanging over Rochford’s head at Teesside Crown Court.
The judge acknowledged the trauma and fear suffered by the victims of burglary.
“For months and months and sometimes years, they never recover,” he added.
But he said Rochford had rid himself of a drug habit since the burglaries in February.
“What you’ve done since I find rather extraordinary and something which doesn’t often happen,” said Judge Bowers.
“I’m going to take a chance on you, an extraordinary chance, one which I don’t often take.”
He followed the recommendation of a pre-sentence report and gave Rochford, of Westbourne Grove, Redcar, a two-year supervision order with drug rehabilitation and 200 hours’ unpaid work, with a one-year driving ban.
He added: “If I see you across the court again, you start with 30 months for that. I won’t take any excuses. You’ve been given an extraordinary chance. I might get pilloried for it. But if you turn up, do the right thing, then I’ll have done the right thing. You let me down and you let yourself down.”
The 'courage' remark was silly idle chit chat, and he deserves criticism for not thinking about how that would be received.. but it sounds to me like he followed the right recommendations here.
Who knows - the guy might just resume his scumbag ways in future - but if there's a chance he can beat his problems, and he's shown evidence of doing that and has the support to do it - it'd be a waste of resources to have him languishing in prison, seeing how good it did him last time. His ex girlfriend who helped him commit the crimes actually has a serving police officer as an uncle.
I don't have a problem with what the judge said, personally. I have more of a problem with David Cameron for feeling he had to comment on it. Shouldn't he and his newly assembled crack team of cabinet cretins have more important things to tend to?