Karsticles
Member
If you go by that method, then it's a lot harder to argue for what team is the worst. For example, take Dormammu/Wesker/Magneto. This is a good team. But if I make it:Well, yeah, if you choose the assists that actually give them synergy, it's not a bad team at all, but what if it's that same team but with the completely wrong assists (not missile, not pendulum, not laser)?
Dormammu (Liberation)
Wesker (Jaguar Kick)
Magneto (Force Field)
That's a pretty terrible team.
Or:
C. Viper (Seismo)
Magneto (Force Field)
Amaterasu (Solar Flare)
C. Viper is going to be really crappy on this team. Will it be worse than Phoenix Wright / Hsien-ko / Shuma-Gorath with bad assists picked? Maybe, it's hard to say. We don't have a lot of tournament evidence to back up claims about how this would go. Hsien-ko at least has 3 decent assists, so it's already a step ahead of the above teams. What makes Phoenix Wright do poorly is that he can't keep the onslaught of characters + assists off of him during normal play. If C. Viper no longer has any supporting assist, can she still beat Wright 1v1? Likely so, but I hope that my post has helped demonstrate how a "worst characters + worst assists" battle is a really tough team to determine.
Clearly, Dr. Doom wouldn't be on such a team.
She has the infinite! Umm...yeah. Remember when people wanted her nerfed because she was the #1 assist at pre-release? Hahahaha.Chun-Li would have to be on a "worst team" imo. I can't think of any other character in the game with pretty much no reason to pick. All of the other characters considered to be "bad" have that one redeeming quality that could theoretically be utilized in some specific team setup: better assists, better damage, better something. I think characters that are bad in most aspects but good in at least one are better off than those who are poor at everything.