Da fuq man, TLOU only a 9? I thought you were cool Net Wrecker.
I disagree so hard with the complaints about the platforming in this game. Yeah it's easy and you're not timing jumps to avoid pitfalls and going on moving platforms and shit, but so far they've done a really excellent job of making each traversal section really distinct and essentially being little puzzles that complicate the core mechanics in different ways. Like you might go for a rope swing and be unable to reach the ledge you think you have to get to, but then you realize you have to slide down further and swing *under* a broken wall to reach a previously unseen path.
I always liked UC3. Sorry boys. There's a lot about 4 that feels like expanded and heavily refined aspects of 3 as well.
I agree with you, and I thought Ch.17-20 were the highlight of the game because of that dynamic.
It's great. All the non-combat stuff is really great and/or improved over past games. Can't say whether it'll all be as engaging in a second playthrough, but yeah.
I'd give UC4 a 10. But I agree with the rest. UC1 is awful.If I'm forced to apply a numerical value to simplify my beautiful fully formedobjective factsopinions on these campaigns, my rankings would look like
UC1 = 6
UC2 = 9
UC3 = 6
TLOU = 9
UC4 = 7
If we're including multiplayer in the ratings (aka the "entire package" score), UC2 =10 and UC4 = 8.
Uncharted 3 is just as good as 2.
/dropmic
Chloe lovers are the worst.
I'd jump in on the ratings game, but I think they're all 10/10 so no diversity there.
I was always of the opinion that UC2 had the best stretch of pacing and encounters in the series. When it picks up, it picks up.
The combat was really lacking for me though.
None of the guns felt good, and the melee felt terrible (might be getting UC1 and UC2s hand to hand mixed up).
So we're doing numbers, eh? This is not usually how I rate them, but I'll round up just for simplicity's sake
UC1: 8.5/10
UC2: 10/10
UC3: 9.5/10
TLOU: 10/10
UC4: 10/10
I should add that Uncharted 4 is the best ND game IMO.
Uncharted 3 is just as good as 2.
/dropmic
Chloe lovers are the worst.
UC1 - 7
UC2 - 9
UC3 - 8.5
UC4 - 9
TLOU - Citizen Kane
My only complaint with the ending.I think Sam got off too easy. He lied and put everyone's life at risk and no one seemed to mind. Everyone forgave him too quickly.
While I liked uc3 there definitely was something off about it. Even in the collection with the "fixed" gunplay I saved a bunch of video clips with crazy issues with hit detection such as invisible walls, or bullets just not landing for some reason. On top of that a lot of the major set-pieces were very "me too!" such as the horses on the convoy vs. the original convoy set piece. It has some truly great moments, but it's not on the same level as 2 for a lot of different reasons- the treasure doesn't seem as great, the lost world definitely isn't as great, the villains are nowhere near as menacing or threatening as Lazaravich.
1 for me is a damn good first effort. It really set a new bar when it came out at least for me it did. I liked the gunplay better in 1, even though some would say it's the weakest in the series, again it lacks those strange hit detection issues. I also think context is important. 3 was trying to follow up the king of the genre and it didn't quite make it.
Papercuts with dat edge. Trying to be all Washington Post up in here.
5 is average, dammit.
There is a large difference in quality between these to me, and the difference between an 8 and a 9 is not actually that big.
Papercuts with dat edge. Trying to be all Washington Post up in here.
UC1: 4/10
UC2: 7/10
UC3: 5/10
UC4: 8/10
TLOU: 10/10
UC1: 4/10
UC2: 7/10
UC3: 5/10
UC4: 8/10
TLOU: 10/10
Hehe, which is why I specifically asked for your opinions the other day. Brofist.Almost mirrors my ratings. Brofist.
My opinion on Uncharted 3 is that it tried to have the storytelling of 4 and the wall to wall action of 2, but failed at both.
Seriously? 5 is the middle number on the scale from 1 to 10. Deal with it.5 isn't average, 5 is an F. 7 is average.
I had more fun with it the second time, because I was just messing around. It really has some "oomph" to it, feels like what you think a 4x4 should feel like in a game (even though I don't think it's actually a 4x4 in the game, I think only rear-wheel XD).It's great. All the non-combat stuff is really great and/or improved over past games. Can't say whether it'll all be as engaging in a second playthrough, but yeah.
I freaking wish....I would LOVE a multiplayer racing mode. Naughty Dog, please!
Naw mang, I completely disagree.It feels good, but there's really nothing to it. It's just a way of getting from point to be, there's no real gameplay there imo. Not sure why they included it. I liked the winch, I guess.
5 isn't average, 5 is an F. 7 is average.
I'd love to see your ratings for 90% of other games if those are getting 4s and 5s.
Seriously? 5 is the middle number on the scale from 1 to 10. Deal with it.
Unless you are being sarcastic.
a game would be lower than 5 if it's worse than a dud, something that's broken or abysmal.Translating a grading scale 1/1 with a review never made sense to me. 1-6 are never used, lol. What makes a game a 2 versus a 6?
Each number should mean something...when testing if you get a 50% you don't know half the material which is awful. They're harsher for a reason.
This hearkens back to my comment about Uncharted 2 being the culmination of balance between Hennig and Druckmann while Uncharted 3 was Hennig Unchecked and Uncharted 4 would likely be Druckmann unchecked. Funny now that if you combined 3 and 4 you'd probably get the greatness of 2 again.
Grade scales vary by person and or site mate. Eurogamer will actually use the full scale. Ign seems to go by the A to F scale. So just translate his ratings into your own scale. Not that hard.i'm going by percentages and how grades are given, so 5 out of 10 is 50 percent which is an F on a grade scale. 6 is a D, 7 is a C, 8 is a B, 9 is an A, and 10 is an A+
I'd love to see your ratings for 90% of other games if those are getting 4s and 5s.
4/10 is bad, 5/10 is just eh. I like to use the full scale when available. UC1 is damn near unplayable in 2016(and it wasnt that good in 2007 frankly), and UC3 strengths are mitigated by its many, many weaknesses.
other games I played this year for example:
XCOM 2: 9/10
Dark Souls 3: 8/10
Street Fighter V: 8/10(the core game...the product itself is terrible lol)
Uncharted 4: 8/10
Ratchet & Clank: 7/10
Doom: 7/10
Rise of the Tomb Raider PC: 7/10
Star Fox Zero: 7/10
Hyper Light Drifter: 7/10
Superhot!: 6/10
Mario & Luigi: Paper Jam: 6/10
Quantum Break: 5/10
That's what I was thinking. If UC3 is a 5/10, I wonder what he'd give games like Army of Two, Straglehold, R.I.P.D, Rambo, Lost Planet 3, Scourge, Binary Domain, Kane & Lynch, Sam & Max, Bionic Commando, The Godfather etc.
come on, UC1 isn't THAT bad..UC1: 4/10
UC2: 9/10
UC3: 7/10
UC4: 8/10
TLOU: 10/10
Though i don't subscribe to the school of thought that thinks that a "10/10" is a perfect game or anything.
Just an exceptional one.
This is what GAF consensus will probably go down as by years end.UC1: 4/10
UC2: 9/10
UC3: 7/10
UC4: 8/10
TLOU: 10/10
Though i don't subscribe to the school of thought that thinks that a "10/10" is a perfect game or anything.
Just an exceptional one.
i'm going by percentages and how grades are given, so 5 out of 10 is 50 percent which is an F on a grade scale. 6 is a D, 7 is a C, 8 is a B, 9 is an A, and 10 is an A+
a game would be lower than 5 if it's worse than a dud, something that's broken or abysmal.
UC1: 4/10
UC2: 9/10
UC3: 7/10
UC4: 8/10
TLOU: 10/10
Though i don't subscribe to the school of thought that thinks that a "10/10" is a perfect game or anything.
Just an exceptional one.
come on, UC1 isn't THAT bad..