tanod said:
I'm talking about their published review scale descriptions. Not some imaginary biased bullshit. It's called "People have different tastes. Stop the damn 'TEH BIAS' whining." That shit is annoying.
Everyone has their own personality. People will tend to prefer magazines with people who share common characteristics. Saying someone is biased is the equivalent of saying their opinion means nothing because the reviewers' individual traits do not align with their own. Once you get hundreds of comments like these, you should begin to wonder if you are truly writing for your audience. If the magazine does not write for the audience, then they are not performing their jobs. The readers have a right to call others out for biased acts. Whether it is true or not, we may never know. Meanwhile, the customer can unsubscribe: like me.
P.S. I actually think the quality of Electronic Gaming Monthly is pretty poor. I, myself, prefer how Game Informer writes their articles. I do think they are pretty well done. PSM is also a favorite of mine. Now it has become PlayStation: The Official Magazine. And from what I have read so far, it is so much better. Unbelievably, so! That's just my opinion though, which is only good if you wanted to know more about me. Otherwise, this last paragraph was a complete waste of your time.