[CFD] El Capitan said:Wow that gamepro review was terrible. It sounds like the guy just sucked at it to me. Complaining about how its too hard to aim when you get shot and the screen turns black and white?.....Really?....like...for reals?
Kittonwy said:That review makes no fucking sense.
Challenging enemy AIs are bad.
Responsive platforming controls are bad.
Challenging gameplay is bad.
Story that are classic pulp fiction is bad.
Like wtf. Unbelievable.
7.5!? Limit your expectations damnit. This is Gamespot we're talking about here after all.TEH-CJ said:Next up gamespot!
7.5
mark my words people it will not score over an 8.
Hence you wait behind cover to heal..tw*t (gamepro that is) Can you see while your nearly dead? The B&W is a punishment for you sucking at the game, retard[CFD] El Capitan said:Wow that gamepro review was terrible. It sounds like the guy just sucked at it to me. Complaining about how its too hard to aim when you get shot and the screen turns black and white?.....Really?....like...for reals?
Fady K said:Guys, a little off topic - but Gamepro gave freakin Blacksite Area 51 the same score as Uncharted.
Ynos Yrros said:Well, Games radar, UDF: 8, TR: A: 9, Smackdown: 8, NFSPS: 9.
I have no diea if those guys were moneyhatted, or if they are just biased.
deepbrown said:So who wants to bombard gamepro with angry emails/messages. Because that is just ridiculous, at least Gamesradar gave some effort to their trolling.
I don't know about that. The negative subconcious towards the ps3 is generally deserved, but when it comes to individual developers making games it's a kick in the fucking balls. ND know their game is bloody A-Class and if I was them I'd try and get away from Sony and start making 360 games. It's the only way their work will get the credit it deserves, and the sales they need for profit.TEH-CJ said:I think we should to all fucking publicants in general.
its beyond a jk now.
Wollan said:102 minutes of video (~60min game cutscenes, ~40min behind scenes material)
Also, for the new page:
IGN 9.1
EuroGamer 9
Gametap 9
Gamespy 9
GameInformer 8.75 & 9
1up/EGM: 8.5
TTP 9
Portuguese Max Console mag 9
Danish website 9.5
[CFD] El Capitan said:I'm actually surprised to see some 9s in the reviews though. I was expecting much more hate than this.
Also whats up with 1up or Gamepro not even mentioning there is no load time? That adds a lot to a game. It pulls you out of the experience if you are waiting 5 mins between levels.
[CFD] El Capitan said:I'm actually surprised to see some 9s in the reviews though. I was expecting much more hate than this.
Also whats up with 1up or Gamepro not even mentioning there is no load time? That adds a lot to a game. It pulls you out of the experience if you are waiting 5 mins between levels.
[CFD] El Capitan said:I'm actually surprised to see some 9s in the reviews though. I was expecting much more hate than this.
Also whats up with 1up or Gamepro not even mentioning there is no load time? That adds a lot to a game. It pulls you out of the experience if you are waiting 5 mins between levels.
Loudninja said:Man that was so damn funny reading that review.What did he want? a 30 button press combo to jump? they made it easy ,simple, and fun
deepbrown said:ND know their game is bloody A-Class and if I was them I'd try and get away from Sony and start making 360 games. It's the only way their work will get the credit it deserves, and the sales they need for profit.
What's up with Gamepro not mentioning ANYTHING. The graphics, the animation, the acting, the music, the mechanics, the weapons, the collectables....I don't want to get angry[CFD] El Capitan said:I'm actually surprised to see some 9s in the reviews though. I was expecting much more hate than this.
Also whats up with 1up or Gamepro not even mentioning there is no load time? That adds a lot to a game. It pulls you out of the experience if you are waiting 5 mins between levels.
Yeah, pretty much. But, you have to admit, some of these reviews are rather pathetic.Dante said:I think you guys are over reacting a bit, the scores are great ( mostly 9's ) the demo rocks, I think your wasting your energy getting all upset over them.
-viper- said:Reading GamePro's review has given me reason to believe that Microsoft have paid off some reviewers to purposely give poorer scores to PS3 games to not attract consumers to the games.
Greg said:I don't give a shit about scores, as I already played the demo - I'm just offended we have to deal with such poor quality writing for one of the biggest titles of the year. I could understand if we had 6 paragraphs (gamepro translation: sentences) of well-written material, but it's laughable the way the entire thing is structured.
I'm obviously not the best in writing, but to think someone got paid to write that... fuck. :lol
Loudninja said:IGN 9.1
EuroGamer 9
Gametap 9
Gamespy 9
GameInformer 8.75 & 9
1up/EGM: 8.5
Gamepro 4/5
Gamesradar 8/10
TTP 9
Portuguese Max Console mag 9
Danish website 9.5
Great scores overall
Have you READ the review? I don't give a monkey's about the scores. If it doesn't get on your tits, then there's no hope for you[CFD] El Capitan said:.......Shut your damn mouth.
Dante said:I think you guys are over reacting a bit, the scores are great ( mostly 9's ) the demo rocks, I think your wasting your energy getting all upset over them.
Being on PS3, no loading times is an expected standard. You don't get points taken off if you have no loading times. If you want extra points, you need to have negative loading times. Textures must appear before you see them and in a higher quality than they will be by the time the anti-loading finishes.[CFD] El Capitan said:I'm actually surprised to see some 9s in the reviews though. I was expecting much more hate than this.
Also whats up with 1up or Gamepro not even mentioning there is no load time? That adds a lot to a game. It pulls you out of the experience if you are waiting 5 mins between levels.
deepbrown said:I don't know about that. The negative subconcious towards the ps3 is generally deserved, but when it comes to individual developers making games it's a kick in the fucking balls. ND know their game is bloody A-Class and if I was them I'd try and get away from Sony and start making 360 games. It's the only way their work will get the credit it deserves, and the sales they need for profit.
deepbrown said:What's up with Gamepro not mentioning ANYTHING. The graphics, the animation, the acting, the music, the mechanics, the weapons, the collectables....I don't want to get angry
mintylurb said:Yeah, pretty much. But, you have to admit, some of these reviews are rather pathetic.
Chipopo said:wtf? I thought this was going to be AAA.... :\
deepbrown said:I don't know about that. The negative subconcious towards the ps3 is generally deserved, but when it comes to individual developers making games it's a kick in the fucking balls. ND know their game is bloody A-Class and if I was them I'd try and get away from Sony and start making 360 games. It's the only way their work will get the credit it deserves, and the sales they need for profit.
deepbrown said:Have you READ the review? I don't give a monkey's about the scores. If it doesn't get on your tits, then there's no hope for you
So an AAA game only consists of scores above 9?Chipopo said:wtf? I thought this was going to be AAA.... :\
Dante said:I think you guys are over reacting a bit, the scores are great ( mostly 9's ) the demo rocks, I think your wasting your energy getting all upset over them.
f_elz said:some of you guys are really sad.
Dizzan said:Exactly. A review being good or bad shouldn't matter. The scores are consistently high. The more you guys bitch about it, the more you look like.... well, bitches.
f_elz said:some of you guys are really sad.
Dizzan said:Exactly. A review being good or bad shouldn't matter. The scores are consistently high. The more you guys bitch about it, the more you look like.... well, bitches.
Loudninja said:Did you even read the gamepro review?
AltogetherAndrews said:For thinking that the developers deserve more competent criticism than the rot that these happy hobbyists with VIP passes, er, professional reviewers can deliver? Not really.
It's a good thing most people aren't bothered by the scores then, eh? Read the reviews.
Yeah but it doesn't matter. You've played the demo and you LOVE it. Me also. I know Im going to have a blast with Uncharted and I couldnt care less what some douche at Gamepro says about it.
I just think you guys are over reacting. Gears got 8's. Halo 3 got 8's. Resistance got 8's. Even Zelda got an 8.
Oh by all means laugh/cry about poorly written 3 paragraph reviews that look like they had the intern take a whack at the game for a couple of hours because no one else could be bothered. There is no lack of just brutal "reviewing" going around that needs a good swift kick in the junk. I'm talking about the conspiracy shit that was bubbling up a few pages ago, some ppl here want to see moneyhats and platform bias when I think the generally awful state of game media and professional criticism is a less sexy but more likely culprit.AltogetherAndrews said:But we're not talking about scores.
Exaggeration of course - with a little grain of truth? Perhaps.[CFD] El Capitan said:haha of course i did but damn.....what they did with the ps3 is nuts and this is their first game on it...i dont want to see them leaving it is all i'm saying. I think it will sell good though. Regardless of the poorly written reviews.