when a review makes criticisms based on factually incorrect information, it fails as a review.RandomVince said:I assume the current outrage is at the gametrailers review?
I thought it seemed reasonable. I'm not after high art from Uncharted. I'm after an enjoyable game. It seems that's exactly what it is, with superb animation on top of it.
+1 sale.
Nice. I laughed when he surprised them. Wonder if there's a 60seconds version.Loudninja said:Uncharted commercial!
http://www.gametrailers.com/player/usermovies/132327.html
11/19/07 - 2:35am - Chapter 20
My system was gracious enough to let me continue on to Chapter 20 before locking up again (what a tease). This game just keeps delivering non-stop fun. The story is not as straight forward as you would think as it throws our characters some twists and turns along the way. While the story lays down the framework, its the characters that continue to carry it through. They grow on you with their developing friendships, one-liners, observations and more. All delivered with a tongue in cheek bravado that makes you smile.
Updating on several features, theres been a nice selection of weaponry available as the game progresses. Not satisfied with AK-47s, the baddies begin to pack some serious heat. As you beat them down, you have to pick and choose which two guns to bring into the next fight. The options are plentiful though. So if you get attached to one type of weapon, you can be sure that youll find plenty of ammo for it as you continue.
While I continue to move through the game and as the action ramps up, I still just cant help but sit back and take in the beautiful sights the game has to offer. From the big things to the little things, Naughty Dog brings you a feast for your eyes. I dont want to spoil a lot of the later environments, but Ill just say, that I believe they are the best Ive ever seen for a game of this type.
The little things also catch my eye. Drake continues to show more animations as I go through the game. For instance, the look on his face changes each time hes up against cover. He reacts to gun shots, the amount of action around him, and even what kind of cover hes behind. He even has several different ways of just jogging up and down stairs! Its not just limited to Drake either. Both Elena and Sully have a plethora of animations of their own depending on the circumstances. They are no slouch at gunplay either.
When I finish up the game, I will write up my Final Thoughts in a more structured format for easier reading. I hesitate to call it a review since I dont normally review games, but if you want to call it that, thats fine by me. I cant wait!
dfyb said:when a review makes criticisms based on factually incorrect information, it fails as a review.
reviews should not mislead people.
Ploid 3.0 said:Edit: Wow, nice detailed impressions Kintaro. I had no idea it would carry on throughout the chapters. I was under the impression that you already finished it. This is interesting, would be nice if this was a kind of review standard. Since, you know, people dont usually complete a game in one day as the do movies, resturants, plays, etc.
RandomVince said:What is factually incorrect in the review? (I havent played the game).
Overall I found it to be a pretty positive review pointing out some standard shortcomings that many games nowadays have (longevity, for example, or common gameplay mechanics). To me it just seems that the review confirms the game has what I'm looking for.
the game is region free (as was the demo, which had a bug)Trevelyon said:Any PAL importers have the US ver? is it region free?
Didn't give a thought to it when I pre-ordered a while ago. But with the demo fiasco, I'm little worried now.
WTF, this makes no sense at all.satterfield said:Unless you've already played the game you'd never know.
hahaGary Whitta said:WTF, this makes no sense at all.
A spoiler can't be a spoiler if you've already played the game, that much we know.
But you're also saying that it's not a spoiler if you haven't already played the game because you wouldn't know it's a spoiler.
So basically there's no such thing as a spoiler as there's no state in which one can exist. !!?!?!!?
YYZ said:hmm, so Satterfield reviewed it. I've seen him on Bonus Round, he's very much a hardcore gamer, but it's not necessarily a good thing. His view is too limited it seems. Never take marks off a game for being "too short" even though the length was actually perfect. If the game was 15 hours long, it would just become repetitve like Assassin's Creed (one of the primary criticisms of that game). If you pay attention closely to everything about this game (gameplay, story, presentation, pacing), you would realize how amazing of a job Naughty Dog did in making this.
Ceb said:The complaints about the length is GT falling into the "too objective" trap that they so often find themselves in.
"The game lasts for 8-10 hours, which is OK, but I guess some people (unspecified) might find it to be too short."
The worst part is where he says it "doesn't have $60 legs" and basically encourages people to rent it over a weekend.
reilo said:Thank you for coming in here and putting yourself on the line like this. I appreciate that.
But here is my beef... to call Uncharted "unoriginal" or, as you lovely put it, "Tomb Raider meets Gears of War," [which is a valid way of putting it, but shallow at best] is selling the game very short.
Here, I will write up a plot summary of a game, and please tell me which title this reminds you of. To make things easier, you don't have to stick to the same medium [in fairness because you referenced "Romancing The Stone"]:
No, I'm not talking about Halo. No, I'm not talking about Gears of War. No, I'm not talking about Battlestar Galactica. No, I'm not talking about War of the Worlds. No, I'm not talking about Star Wars. No, I'm not talking about Dark City. No, I'm not talking about Serenity/Firefly.
While I love most of these games, movies, and tv-shows, and while they are all highly critically acclaimed, nobody ever brought those aforementioned titles down because they were deemed 'unoriginal.'
If anything, Drake's take on the action/adventure genre is far more refreshing and unique to its medium than anything we have seen in recent years. Generalizing Uncharted into, "but it's just Gears of War meets Tomb Raider meets Romancing The Stone," sells it very, very short, because underneath all of that, it is nothing like any of those titles. I am not singling you out, most previews and podcasts about Uncharted by other websites and magazines are doing the exact same thing. In the recent 1Up Yours podcast, they said Uncharted won't be a big hit because, and I am paraphrasing here, "it's like Gears of War meets Tomb Raider, minus the big boobs and tight ass cheeks."
Then you have some factual inaccuracies in your review, and that bothers me a whole lot, too. But these are minor and people only gripe about them because a review shouldn't have such inaccuracies.
Far Cry when it came out, it had an amazing single player campaign, but a putrid multiplayer. Still an amazing game, still rather short single player, and still it is one of the most highly acclaimed titles that came out that year. Plus, some would put Gears' MP as a negative... so, I'd rather have one of the best single player experiences to date than have it being soured by a lousy multiplayer and have resources diverted from its SP campaign.
Hell, some people have short memories, too. Metal Gear Solid 1 could be beaten in under 4 hours.
Review the game based on what it has, and the quality of it all, and not what it doesn't have. This really doesn't have a whole lot to do with the score of your game [which is a good score!], but the review in and of itself.
Cue "lulz meltdown#!" replies.
Kabuki Waq said:this is probably the reason is got docked marks and why Halo 3 got a 9.8 because people will still be playing it for a couple fo years(not me tho since cod4 MP kicks its ass)
I am honestly really impressed with uncharted but i thinik 8.9 -9.3 range is the perfect score.
Borys said:What's the GameSpot score?
And the riots are because of... GameTrailers score?
Jeez, who reads (or watches) GameTrailers?
spwolf said:based on that, Warhawk would have gotten 12/10 from every publication.... but oh wait.
Uncharted, GOTY, 88% average.
SolidSnakex said:Well GT reviews are significantly better than other sites in general.
Kabuki Waq said:this is probably the reason is got docked marks and why Halo 3 got a 9.8 because people will still be playing it for a couple fo years(not me tho since cod4 MP kicks its ass)
I am honestly really impressed with uncharted but i thinik 8.9 -9.3 range is the perfect score.
I would say if anything Assassin's Creed is the consoles' Crysis. Uncharted (while sharing lots of palm trees) isnt that much about view distances, but rather about awesome production value when it comes to animation/detailBorys said:2) Uncharted is pretty as fuck. This really is consoles' Crysis.
quetz67 said:I would say if anything Assassin's Creed is the consoles' Crysis. Uncharted (while sharing lots of palm trees) isnt that much about view distances, but rather about awesome production value when it comes to animation/detail
satterfield said:Come on guys. Both of those games have almost unlimited replay value in addition to kick-assed single-player campaigns. Not to mention original ideas like the perks system, forge, theatre, etc. I finished Uncharted in a little under eight hours on normal difficulty. How can some of you say we didn't play the game? You can see footage of the entire game unlocked right in the review along with gameplay from the end of the game. There's no conspiracy. For the guy who mentioned Gears, did you even look at our review of it? The truth is, value plays a lot into our scores. You can try to hang your hat on the fact that we mention no online, but if the single-player were at least of reasonable length it would have scored higher. Eight hours for $60 may be plenty for you guys, but someone who works hard for their games and could care less what system they're on, we think, will want more.
Borys said:What's the GameSpot score?
Pristine_Condition said:LOL @ the nimrod reviewer @ Gametrailers who thinks Kirk Douglas was the lead in "Romancing the Stone."
:lol
Yet one more reason this review fails.
quetz67 said:I would say if anything Assassin's Creed is the consoles' Crysis. Uncharted (while sharing lots of palm trees) isnt that much about view distances, but rather about awesome production value when it comes to animation/detail
Borys said:What's the GameSpot score?
And the riots are because of... GameTrailers score?
Jeez, who reads (or watches) GameTrailers?
Loudninja said:Uncharted: Drake's Fortune UK Review 8.4/10
http://ps3.ign.com/articles/836/836252p2.html
...we're still waiting for Sony's PS3 to offer some serious depth to its high-gloss exclusives...
But that is 'faked'. It is not like you can visit that distant scenery as you often can in AC or Crysis. The focus in development is a different one, that of Crysis is closer to AC.Kittonwy said:Are you kidding? Uncharted's view distance is rather impressive.
typhonsentra said:How long was Bioshock by the way?
quetz67 said:But that is 'faked'. It is not like you can visit that distant scenery as you often can in AC or Crysis. The focus in development is a different one, that of Crysis is closer to AC.
This isnt even the tiniest criticism, the graphics in Uncharted are almost perfect and it is overall a game as good and in some regards better looking than Crysis.
Well then, LAir and Heavenly Sword rape AC.quetz67 said:But that is 'faked'. It is not like you can visit that distant scenery as you often can in AC or Crysis. The focus in development is a different one, that of Crysis is closer to AC.
This isnt even the tiniest criticism, the graphics in Uncharted are almost perfect and it is overall a game as good and in some regards better looking than Crysis.