• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

United States Election: Nov 6, 2012 |OT| - Barack Obama Re-elected

Status
Not open for further replies.

coldfoot

Banned
I'm leaving too.
The big problem for conservatives is the lack of free, non-socialist countries in the world. We were the last remaining bastion of freedom. We can't just pack our bags and move to Canada. Plus they have bagged milk.


No problem. I'm not bitter. I've suffered for 4 years under oppressive socialism so now I can understand your mindset better. It's the initial stage of giving up my freedom that was difficult.
Came for the lulz from the poligaf thread. Not disappointed. It's gonna snow around here tonight so we need all the salt we can get.
 

FyreWulff

Member
Oh damnit, don't even know how I missed it. Found out that Nebraska had a very low chance of splitting it's electoral votes again because they split the Democrat bases into two districts so it'd be easier for Republicans to outvote them.

Fuck gerrymandering.
 

RPGamer92

Banned
I know. Christie is exactly the kind of Republican that the party absolutely needs to rally behind now. He is honest, outspoken, stands for his (consistant) values, gives credit where it is due irregardless of what "party" they belong to, he isn't too fanatical to avoid reaching across the party line to work together. He embodies everything that the party needs to be in this modern world, where as Romney was honestly the worst of what our party has to offer. Well no, Romney is not as bad as Santorum or Bachman, they would have been worse.

The Republican party needs to retool and adapt to modern times. They need to wake up and leave the extreme religious shit behind. No more magic vagina's and rape being God's will. No more policing the world by brute force, the world does not want that, and neither does most of America. No more favors for the rich, 99% of America doesn't want that, and even a good percentage of the top 1% doesn't want that. Fiscal conservatism does not need to walk hand in hand with extremism.

This should be a large wake up call. I'm curious to see if the party just sleeps on through it or actually opens it's eyes...
Agreed, I also think another problem is how lots of wealthy old people i.e. Donald Trump associate themselves with the party and use their wealth to try and bully Obama and other politicians which was more negatively view by people than positively.
 

mclem

Member
classy. I'm happy to see 538 was right but it pretty much takes all the fun out of the guessing game now, huh? Three predicted elections in a row is a pretty stunning feat.

Well, he's not predicting the election so much as he is predicting the *chance* of an actual outcome. That chance isn't going to go away.
 
I know. Christie is exactly the kind of Republican that the party absolutely needs to rally behind now. He is honest, outspoken, stands for his (consistant) values, gives credit where it is due irregardless of what "party" they belong to, he isn't too fanatical to avoid reaching across the party line to work together. He embodies everything that the party needs to be in this modern world, where as Romney was honestly the worst of what our party has to offer. Well no, Romney is not as bad as Santorum or Bachman, they would have been worse.

The Republican party needs to retool and adapt to modern times. They need to wake up and leave the extreme religious shit behind. No more magic vagina's and rape being God's will. No more policing the world by brute force, the world does not want that, and neither does most of America. No more favors for the rich, 99% of America doesn't want that, and even a good percentage of the top 1% doesn't want that. Fiscal conservatism does not need to walk hand in hand with extremism.

This should be a large wake up call. I'm curious to see if the party just sleeps on through it or actually opens it's eyes...

I guess we will see the republicans response to this in less than 2 months.
 
wow 70%+ of all minority groups. This has to be a wake up call to whatever smart republicans are left in the party

See, the thing is, the minority groups are still just that: a minority of the voting block. That's a future issue.

Women? That is an issue already manifesting itself because it is, by population and voting participation, the largest voting block and it broke for Obama by 11 points.

Women outvoted men by 6% points and voted Democrat over Republican by 11%.

This is a now problem whereas the minority vote is a future problem.

The real wakeup call has to be the policies and messaging around women.
 
See, the thing is, the minority groups are still just that: a minority of the voting block. That's a future issue.

Women? That is an issue already manifesting itself because it is, by population and voting participation, the largest voting block and it broke for Obama by 11 points.

true but if they have to know they will have to do better than 25% of hispanics if they are going to win in 2016 and onward
 

linsivvi

Member
Singapore? Less personal freedom, more financial freedom. High real estate prices though.

You are talking about people who consider Obama a communist. Singapore would just be another communist country with much less freedom. Oh, and they have mandatory health care too.

The funny thing is the arrogance of these people who think they can just move to any country in the world and they'd welcome them.
 

Pre

Member
I know. Christie is exactly the kind of Republican that the party absolutely needs to rally behind now. He is honest, outspoken, stands for his (consistant) values, gives credit where it is due irregardless of what "party" they belong to, he isn't too fanatical to avoid reaching across the party line to work together. He embodies everything that the party needs to be in this modern world, where as Romney was honestly the worst of what our party has to offer. Well no, Romney is not as bad as Santorum or Bachman, they would have been worse.

The Republican party needs to retool and adapt to modern times. They need to wake up and leave the extreme religious shit behind. No more magic vagina's and rape being God's will. No more policing the world by brute force, the world does not want that, and neither does most of America. No more favors for the rich, 99% of America doesn't want that, and even a good percentage of the top 1% doesn't want that. Fiscal conservatism does not need to walk hand in hand with extremism.

This should be a large wake up call. I'm curious to see if the party just sleeps on through it or actually opens it's eyes...

From my perspective as a libertarianish conservative, I'm pretty much at the point that I don't care what the GOP does anymore. They aren't nearly fiscally conservative enough, and the nation is on a crash-course with bankruptcy. I am 100% concerned with the economy right now, and people like Akin are just royal pains in the ass.

The collapse is coming, and it didn't matter who we elected. All the election did was determine at what pace we're going to go flying over the cliff.
 

mclem

Member
No, back then the fear was that New York, Massachusetts, and Pennsylvania would dictate the elections with their larger populations. Rhode Island, Delaware, and Georgia basically would have no say in national elections. So each state started with an electoral vote.
It has evolved into the current system.

My half-joking point was more asking why the small states deserve a say greater than their population.

I completely recognise the factors behind it, and they're reasonably solid - I'm not really arguing that things should change to something fully PV-based - but from a purely pragmatic, dispassionate view, why *shouldn't* the larger population state have more of a say? Or, to turn it on its head: Why *should* an individual vote in a small state carry more weight than an individual vote in California?


(Actually, that said, what *is* the ratio of EV to population for each state? From that standpoint, which states have the most direct power?)
 

Mengy

wishes it were bannable to say mean things about Marvel
I agree with some things and disagree with others.
The Republican party needs to change and change fast or it won't be around for long. I agree that social conservatism needs to go away. They also need to fight much much harder for minority votes.
I disagree with you that Obama has an actual plan. He did little in the way of telling the country how he would manage the debt and deficits and get Americans working again. Instead, his campaign relied on attacks on Mitt Romney. He has no clear mandate for his second term.

Yes, I agree that Obama didn't detail out his plan to my satisfaction either, but his "plan" was still much more clear than anything Romney put up. Romney was running on magic math, it was so fiscally irresponsible that I'm ashamed that any true Republican voted for him at all.

It's embarrassing being a Republican today. Honestly I'm more D than R nowadays anyway, or at least it feels like it now. I wish my party would come back to me.... :(


However, unlike you Bulbo, I'm staying put. Our country needs us now more than ever. I love America, and I ain't going nowhere. :)
 

coldfoot

Banned
My half-joking point was more asking why the small states deserve a say greater than their population.

I completely recognise the factors behind it, and they're reasonably solid - but from a purely pragmatic, dispassionate view, why *shouldn't* the larger population state have more of a say?
They already have more of a say?
 

Kazerei

Banned
Real reason why the Republicans lost and will continue to lose until they fix their image and messaging:

real-reason.jpg


Women outvoted men by 6% and there is an 11% gap favoring Democrats.

Interesting. The pattern between age and voter breakdown is expected, but it's still funny to see how consistent the shift is.
 

Drek

Member
I agree with some things and disagree with others.
The Republican party needs to change and change fast or it won't be around for long. I agree that social conservatism needs to go away. They also need to fight much much harder for minority votes.
I disagree with you that Obama has an actual plan. He did little in the way of telling the country how he would manage the debt and deficits and get Americans working again. Instead, his campaign relied on attacks on Mitt Romney. He has no clear mandate for his second term.

Accept he clearly ran on the following policies:

tax raises on top earners to pay for deficit reduction.
leveling off the growth of military spending.
pushing through the Dream Act.

That coupled with the "Grand Bargain" he tried to get Boehner to take and his American Jobs Act hit all the bases as far as his domestic policy are concerned.

Saying that Obama didn't have an actual plan is pure ignorance. It's there and quite easy to find. A sitting POTUS can't run on the kind of "day one" statements Romney was making because those aren't actually possible to unilaterally do and if they were a sitting POTUS should have already done them. Instead Obama kept up the same philosophical narrative that he's been attempting pass legislatively for the past two years.
 

Pre

Member
I hope you don't mind me asking, what's your ethnicity?

I'm white.

That obviously makes me a super-racist for thinking people have the right to be racist even though I personally am not.

Or is the argument going to be that, since I've never been hit with the n-word, I am ignorant to the necessity of locking people up for thoughtcrime?
 
Interesting. The pattern between age and voter breakdown is expected, but it's still funny to see how consistent the shift is.

As I keep pointing out: Women were the single largest voting block.

Digest that for a moment.

Let it sink in: Women were the single largest voting block

For all the talk of the age shift, the racial shift -- both minorities and the youth are a smaller voting block than women.

Republicans lost because they turned off women.

What has Obama done? Two female SCOTUS judges, Ledbetter Fair Pay Act, ACA birth control provisions, appointed and supported competent women in high positions, etc.
 

mbmonk

Member
Have we searched twitter looking for other racists (aka non white racist)? Or are we just looking for white racist who hate Obama? If we find non-white racist can we beg anon to forward their to their employers as well?

NOTE: I am not defending racism. I can't be defended. I am more pointing out the cherry picking of tweets to match the possible agenda. If we are exposing racist, then lets do just that.
 
I have a question, all these people threatening to move to another country, do they have a "World Citizen" passport/nationality valid to live wherever they chose?
Are these people aware they can and probably will be kicked back/deported to the states unless they apply the proper way to immigrate to whatever country they selected? and even doing that the selection process is always lengthy and demanding (depending of the country chosen a proficiency in other languages will be needed)
Is this threat to move to another country an empty threat? I just can't help picturing in my head a middle-america red-neck with his family landing in another country and saying to the customs officer: "Hello I am 'murrican here is my 'murrican passport you're so lucky I've chosen this country to live in"
 

mclem

Member
As I keep pointing out: Women were the single largest voting block.

Digest that for a moment.

Let it sink in: Women were the single largest voting block

For all the talk of the age shift, the racial shift -- both minorities and the youth are a smaller voting block than women.

Republicans lost because they turned off women.

While that's true, the female block isn't growing like the hispanic one is. This election may pivot around women, but Republicans have problems in more than one field right now.
 

Plinko

Wildcard berths that can't beat teams without a winning record should have homefield advantage
wow 70%+ of all minority groups. This has to be a wake up call to whatever smart republicans are left in the party

And to be fair to Fox News, they had several people on this morning saying the exact same thing. One lady even said that the reason the GOP lost 5 senate races is because they keep electing "crazy people" in the primaries.
 

Plinko

Wildcard berths that can't beat teams without a winning record should have homefield advantage
As I keep pointing out: Women were the single largest voting block.

Digest that for a moment.

Let it sink in: Women were the single largest voting block

For all the talk of the age shift, the racial shift -- both minorities and the youth are a smaller voting block than women.

Republicans lost because they turned off women.

What has Obama done? Two female SCOTUS judges, Ledbetter Fair Pay Act, ACA birth control provisions, appointed and supported competent women in high positions, etc.

Exactly. And when Romney offered "hope" for the future for that young girl in the town hall debate by saying he lets his female employees off early to go cook for their family, I think that was a dagger.
 

DietRob

i've been begging for over 5 years.
Best Birthday present I could have wished for.
0066.gif


I'm 33 today.. Fuck.

I want a Bjork birthday thread!!
 

lednerg

Member
I agree with some things and disagree with others.
The Republican party needs to change and change fast or it won't be around for long. I agree that social conservatism needs to go away. They also need to fight much much harder for minority votes.
I disagree with you that Obama has an actual plan. He did little in the way of telling the country how he would manage the debt and deficits and get Americans working again. Instead, his campaign relied on attacks on Mitt Romney. He has no clear mandate for his second term.

The Bush tax cuts, the war in Afghanistan, the war in Iraq, and the prescription drug plan. What do all of these things have in common? They were paid for on our credit card - in other words, they weren't included in the budget. The debt was always there, it just wasn't on the books because 'someone' didn't put it there. That should piss you off, and maybe it does, I don't know. These things didn't appear on the budget (or our debt) until the Obama administration.

Getting people back to work. What should we do about that? How about giving 'employers' (aka rich people) a bunch of money via tax cuts? Okay great. What about that makes them employ people, exactly? The kindness of their hearts? No. All of the people showing up buying stuff, leading them to have to hire people? No. The lack of customers is what's fucking businesses. Nobody's buying shit, so there's no need to hire people. This fundamental problem doesn't get solved from the top down. There instead needs to be people with actual buying power in place before we can jump start the economy. This includes government employees and even, gasp, welfare and unemployment. That's what gets money straight into the economy. It's like socialism making capitalism stronger in some freaky sort of way.

It's also not unprecedented. It's exactly what made the engine of the middle class that drove the US into prosperity from the 40's to the 70's. We gave people the means to buy shit, and then capitalism took over from there. This worked, until some people started to plot and scheme in the 80's to tip the scales in their own favor. We now live in the aftermath of those schemes, which came to a head in 2008. So is the answer to give those same people the reigns, or to go back to what actually worked for us for so long?
 

Talon

Member
Private industry's been hiring at a strong pace. It's the fact that the recession led to so many public employees being laid off that is hurting the jobs numbers.
 

Eidan

Member
It was so funny hearing Rachel Maddow announce Obama winning Ohio. She seemed almost surprised at how anticlimactic it was.
 

verbum

Member
(Actually, that said, what *is* the ratio of EV to population for each state? From that standpoint, which states have the most direct power?)

From Wikipedia:
The size of the Electoral College is equal to the total voting membership of both Houses of Congress (435 Representatives and 100 Senators) plus the three electors allocated to Washington, D.C., totaling 538 electors.

Each state is allocated as many electors as it has Representatives and Senators in the United States Congress.[31][32] Since the most populous states have the most seats in the House of Representatives, they also have the most electors. The six states with the most electors are California (55), Texas (38), New York (29), Florida (29), Illinois (20) and Pennsylvania (20). The seven smallest states by population—Alaska, Delaware, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Vermont, and Wyoming—have three electors each. Each state's number of Representatives is determined every 10 years by the United States Census, thus determining the number of electoral votes for each state.

Under the Twenty-third Amendment, Washington, D.C. is allocated as many electors as it would have if it were a state, but no more electors than the least populous state. The least populous state (Wyoming, as of 2011) has three electors; thus, D.C. cannot have more than three electors. Even if D.C. were a state, its population would entitle it to three electors; based on its population per electoral vote, D.C. has the second highest per-capita Electoral College representation, after Wyoming.[33]
 

Ithil

Member
So is unemployment benefit seriously considered some kind of horrible plague that's going to blow up the country? Seems baffling to me, it's a standard thing here

And yeah, you get layabouts who do nothing and just use the unemployment money to live, but it's not exactly going to let you "live it up" on the government's money, it would give you about 10,000 euros per year. No yachts for the unemployed, I'm afraid.
 

Dash27

Member
Real reason why the Republicans lost and will continue to lose until they fix their image and messaging:

Women outvoted men by 6% and there is an 11% gap favoring Democrats.

I thought Romney closed the gap with women to a fairly significant degree? In any event, THIS is why women shouldnt be allowed to vote! Hmm maybe we need to run a broad next time.
 

mclem

Member
Real reason why the Republicans lost and will continue to lose until they fix their image and messaging:

real-reason.jpg


Women outvoted men by 6% and there is an 11% gap favoring Democrats.

Actually, to expand on that, I'm always a little curious about the fact that there's a significant gap between the vote breakdown for married women and married men. Both groups might lean Republican, but married men appear to do so moreso.

It's the idea that there's couples out there - a not insignificant number - where the woman votes Democrat and the man votes Republican.

It's not that I'm expecting couples to vote in lockstep, as such; it's more curiosity about why the issues that lead the woman to vote Democrat - which, at least it's implied, are more women's rights/social ones - how the husband doesn't have empathy towards the woman's opinion in that. If someone I cared about felt strongly about an issue that I may not have previously considered, that'd drive me towards thinking further about how it affects others.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom