I highly doubt people who write that trash on twitter have much to lose in the way of employment or personal relations
You'd be surprised, actually. At least on the employment part.
I highly doubt people who write that trash on twitter have much to lose in the way of employment or personal relations
Came for the lulz from the poligaf thread. Not disappointed. It's gonna snow around here tonight so we need all the salt we can get.I'm leaving too.
The big problem for conservatives is the lack of free, non-socialist countries in the world. We were the last remaining bastion of freedom. We can't just pack our bags and move to Canada. Plus they have bagged milk.
No problem. I'm not bitter. I've suffered for 4 years under oppressive socialism so now I can understand your mindset better. It's the initial stage of giving up my freedom that was difficult.
Agreed, I also think another problem is how lots of wealthy old people i.e. Donald Trump associate themselves with the party and use their wealth to try and bully Obama and other politicians which was more negatively view by people than positively.I know. Christie is exactly the kind of Republican that the party absolutely needs to rally behind now. He is honest, outspoken, stands for his (consistant) values, gives credit where it is due irregardless of what "party" they belong to, he isn't too fanatical to avoid reaching across the party line to work together. He embodies everything that the party needs to be in this modern world, where as Romney was honestly the worst of what our party has to offer. Well no, Romney is not as bad as Santorum or Bachman, they would have been worse.
The Republican party needs to retool and adapt to modern times. They need to wake up and leave the extreme religious shit behind. No more magic vagina's and rape being God's will. No more policing the world by brute force, the world does not want that, and neither does most of America. No more favors for the rich, 99% of America doesn't want that, and even a good percentage of the top 1% doesn't want that. Fiscal conservatism does not need to walk hand in hand with extremism.
This should be a large wake up call. I'm curious to see if the party just sleeps on through it or actually opens it's eyes...
You'd be surprised, actually. At least on the employment part.
classy. I'm happy to see 538 was right but it pretty much takes all the fun out of the guessing game now, huh? Three predicted elections in a row is a pretty stunning feat.
I know. Christie is exactly the kind of Republican that the party absolutely needs to rally behind now. He is honest, outspoken, stands for his (consistant) values, gives credit where it is due irregardless of what "party" they belong to, he isn't too fanatical to avoid reaching across the party line to work together. He embodies everything that the party needs to be in this modern world, where as Romney was honestly the worst of what our party has to offer. Well no, Romney is not as bad as Santorum or Bachman, they would have been worse.
The Republican party needs to retool and adapt to modern times. They need to wake up and leave the extreme religious shit behind. No more magic vagina's and rape being God's will. No more policing the world by brute force, the world does not want that, and neither does most of America. No more favors for the rich, 99% of America doesn't want that, and even a good percentage of the top 1% doesn't want that. Fiscal conservatism does not need to walk hand in hand with extremism.
This should be a large wake up call. I'm curious to see if the party just sleeps on through it or actually opens it's eyes...
wow 70%+ of all minority groups. This has to be a wake up call to whatever smart republicans are left in the party
I hope you don't mind me asking, what's your ethnicity?Yeah, I support people's right to spout racist garbage. I certainly don't condone it, but I don't think it should be a criminal offense.
See, the thing is, the minority groups are still just that: a minority of the voting block. That's a future issue.
Women? That is an issue already manifesting itself because it is, by population and voting participation, the largest voting block and it broke for Obama by 11 points.
I didn't even get a sticker for voting. I want stuff!http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NZZt3jPDvNQ
Don't know if that has been posted before in this thread but Americans, why is someone like Bill O'Reilly still on air?
I hope you don't mind me asking, what's your ethnicity?
We need these results unskewed, Romney wins with over 400 EV
Singapore? Less personal freedom, more financial freedom. High real estate prices though.
I know. Christie is exactly the kind of Republican that the party absolutely needs to rally behind now. He is honest, outspoken, stands for his (consistant) values, gives credit where it is due irregardless of what "party" they belong to, he isn't too fanatical to avoid reaching across the party line to work together. He embodies everything that the party needs to be in this modern world, where as Romney was honestly the worst of what our party has to offer. Well no, Romney is not as bad as Santorum or Bachman, they would have been worse.
The Republican party needs to retool and adapt to modern times. They need to wake up and leave the extreme religious shit behind. No more magic vagina's and rape being God's will. No more policing the world by brute force, the world does not want that, and neither does most of America. No more favors for the rich, 99% of America doesn't want that, and even a good percentage of the top 1% doesn't want that. Fiscal conservatism does not need to walk hand in hand with extremism.
This should be a large wake up call. I'm curious to see if the party just sleeps on through it or actually opens it's eyes...
No, back then the fear was that New York, Massachusetts, and Pennsylvania would dictate the elections with their larger populations. Rhode Island, Delaware, and Georgia basically would have no say in national elections. So each state started with an electoral vote.
It has evolved into the current system.
I think I understand the cynicism behind your post but it's not remotely cute, I'll tell you that much.IF U WAS BLACK U WUD NOT LIEK DAT
Not the outcome I was hoping for. See you soon, unemployment thread.
I agree with some things and disagree with others.
The Republican party needs to change and change fast or it won't be around for long. I agree that social conservatism needs to go away. They also need to fight much much harder for minority votes.
I disagree with you that Obama has an actual plan. He did little in the way of telling the country how he would manage the debt and deficits and get Americans working again. Instead, his campaign relied on attacks on Mitt Romney. He has no clear mandate for his second term.
They already have more of a say?My half-joking point was more asking why the small states deserve a say greater than their population.
I completely recognise the factors behind it, and they're reasonably solid - but from a purely pragmatic, dispassionate view, why *shouldn't* the larger population state have more of a say?
Real reason why the Republicans lost and will continue to lose until they fix their image and messaging:
Women outvoted men by 6% and there is an 11% gap favoring Democrats.
I agree with some things and disagree with others.
The Republican party needs to change and change fast or it won't be around for long. I agree that social conservatism needs to go away. They also need to fight much much harder for minority votes.
I disagree with you that Obama has an actual plan. He did little in the way of telling the country how he would manage the debt and deficits and get Americans working again. Instead, his campaign relied on attacks on Mitt Romney. He has no clear mandate for his second term.
I hope you don't mind me asking, what's your ethnicity?
They already have more of a say?
Interesting. The pattern between age and voter breakdown is expected, but it's still funny to see how consistent the shift is.
As I keep pointing out: Women were the single largest voting block.
Digest that for a moment.
Let it sink in: Women were the single largest voting block
For all the talk of the age shift, the racial shift -- both minorities and the youth are a smaller voting block than women.
Republicans lost because they turned off women.
wow 70%+ of all minority groups. This has to be a wake up call to whatever smart republicans are left in the party
As I keep pointing out: Women were the single largest voting block.
Digest that for a moment.
Let it sink in: Women were the single largest voting block
For all the talk of the age shift, the racial shift -- both minorities and the youth are a smaller voting block than women.
Republicans lost because they turned off women.
What has Obama done? Two female SCOTUS judges, Ledbetter Fair Pay Act, ACA birth control provisions, appointed and supported competent women in high positions, etc.
I agree with some things and disagree with others.
The Republican party needs to change and change fast or it won't be around for long. I agree that social conservatism needs to go away. They also need to fight much much harder for minority votes.
I disagree with you that Obama has an actual plan. He did little in the way of telling the country how he would manage the debt and deficits and get Americans working again. Instead, his campaign relied on attacks on Mitt Romney. He has no clear mandate for his second term.
(Actually, that said, what *is* the ratio of EV to population for each state? From that standpoint, which states have the most direct power?)
The size of the Electoral College is equal to the total voting membership of both Houses of Congress (435 Representatives and 100 Senators) plus the three electors allocated to Washington, D.C., totaling 538 electors.
Each state is allocated as many electors as it has Representatives and Senators in the United States Congress.[31][32] Since the most populous states have the most seats in the House of Representatives, they also have the most electors. The six states with the most electors are California (55), Texas (38), New York (29), Florida (29), Illinois (20) and Pennsylvania (20). The seven smallest states by populationAlaska, Delaware, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Vermont, and Wyominghave three electors each. Each state's number of Representatives is determined every 10 years by the United States Census, thus determining the number of electoral votes for each state.
Under the Twenty-third Amendment, Washington, D.C. is allocated as many electors as it would have if it were a state, but no more electors than the least populous state. The least populous state (Wyoming, as of 2011) has three electors; thus, D.C. cannot have more than three electors. Even if D.C. were a state, its population would entitle it to three electors; based on its population per electoral vote, D.C. has the second highest per-capita Electoral College representation, after Wyoming.[33]
Best Birthday present I could have wished for.
I'm 33 today.. Fuck.
Real reason why the Republicans lost and will continue to lose until they fix their image and messaging:
Women outvoted men by 6% and there is an 11% gap favoring Democrats.
Happy Birthday man, hope it's a good one.Best Birthday present I could have wished for.
I'm 33 today.. Fuck.
I want a Bjork birthday thread!!
Republicans lost because they turned off women.
Real reason why the Republicans lost and will continue to lose until they fix their image and messaging:
Women outvoted men by 6% and there is an 11% gap favoring Democrats.